Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(129,378 posts)
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 08:51 PM Feb 28

Supreme Court agrees to consider Trump immunity claim in further delay of election interference trial

Source: NBC News

Feb. 28, 2024, 5:03 PM EST / Updated Feb. 28, 2024, 6:18 PM EST


WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Wednesday to decide whether former President Donald Trump can claim presidential immunity over criminal election interference charges, adding a new hurdle to a trial taking place.

The court said in a brief order it would hear arguments and issue a ruling on the immunity claim. In the meantime, the case is on hold, meaning no trial can take place.

The order said the court would hear the case, which could take months to resolve, the week of April 22. That timeline allows for a ruling by the end of the court's regular term in June, which is faster than is typical when the court hears arguments but not as fast as prosecutors wanted it to be.

The legal question the court will decide is "whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office," the order said.

Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-decide-trumps-immunity-claim-election-interference-case-rcna139026

77 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court agrees to consider Trump immunity claim in further delay of election interference trial (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Feb 28 OP
More delay for Loser J Stench Wild blueberry Feb 28 #1
I think Trump is going to lose the 2024 election agingdem Feb 28 #8
I don't think that there is any way that he could win the popular vote. markodochartaigh Feb 28 #28
in 2020 Trump, Barr, and DeJoy knew in early summer Trump was agingdem Feb 28 #38
AND he is short on cash. speak easy Feb 29 #70
It's more complicated than it seems. And even harder to do now with an update to the electoral count act PortTack Feb 29 #45
The Electoral Count Act markodochartaigh Feb 29 #53
This is why PlutosHeart Feb 29 #49
Gee, what a surprise from SCOTUS BigmanPigman Feb 28 #2
I doubt he can hear your criticisms over the roar of his Congressional pension. nt Shermann Feb 28 #15
which he does not need anyway. drray23 Feb 28 #19
I hope they find the President is immune before Biden leaves office, than after. dem4decades Feb 28 #3
Yes, because Biden has "political enemies" and his own "seal-team-6" too. Oopsie Daisy Feb 29 #54
Roberts Kangaroo Court Blue Idaho Feb 28 #4
What a f*cking sick joke. Dave Bowman Feb 28 #5
130 days to decide if a president can murder someone. gab13by13 Feb 28 #6
My thoughts exactly. SCOTUS denied Smith's request for them to take the appeal back in December, but iluvtennis Feb 28 #11
Supreme Court agrees to consider bank robber immunity claim in further delay of bank robbery trial. forgotmylogin Feb 28 #33
And...that's exactly what the history books will say. Along with the most corrupt SC EVER! PortTack Feb 29 #46
After AG appointment 2021, every microsecond the DOJ didn't devote to jailing Trump was dereliction. jaxexpat Feb 29 #55
Dead in the water only if the goods stay kept MOMFUDSKI Feb 29 #57
It seems inevitable. TomSlick Feb 28 #7
Trump's defense has 2 parts Botany Feb 28 #9
MAGA SCOTUS in the kairos12 Feb 28 #10
So will this affect the documents case too BlueKota Feb 28 #12
All of them WestMichRad Feb 28 #16
This shouldn't impact the NY civil and criminal cases BumRushDaShow Feb 28 #18
January 6... agingdem Feb 28 #24
Well at least there is some hope although there's still BlueKota Feb 28 #25
she's been ruling against Trump lately agingdem Feb 28 #27
Hopefully he will have to finally face justice at some point. BlueKota Feb 28 #29
It will delay the stolen documents case too because he claimed immunity. Novara Feb 29 #62
They play every perceived weakness against us. hadEnuf Feb 28 #13
I called it... hurple Feb 28 #14
Which, of course, will take months... orangecrush Feb 29 #66
Lawrence O'Donnell offered positives for the order. That it is limited. I need to wrap my mind around it. LiberalFighter Feb 28 #17
This whole delay thing will backfire on Trump Turbineguy Feb 28 #20
im starting to hink extreme action is needed moonshinegnomie Feb 28 #21
They need time to craft it specifically to be only for T45 IbogaProject Feb 29 #58
My way of thinking here is, We all thought that they were waiting on the Judges writing the DISSENTING opinion bluestarone Feb 28 #22
Gore vs Bush paparush Feb 28 #23
That one that absolutely had to settle quickly fore the EC met in mid December n/t Polybius Feb 29 #73
Members of the supreme court nakocal Feb 28 #26
The MAGA court strikes again. There is no reason for them to hear this appeal. Lonestarblue Feb 28 #30
Jack Smith apparently thought otherwise. Are we tossing him under the bus now? onenote Feb 28 #39
I give Jack a pass PlutosHeart Feb 29 #50
I'm not tossing Smith under the bus. He made that statement before the DC court ruled. Lonestarblue Feb 29 #59
He essentially repeated when he proposed that the Court grant cert onenote Feb 29 #65
Yea BUT did Smith ask for almost a 2 month delay? bluestarone Feb 29 #69
He asked for a one month schedule. He got a two month onenote Feb 29 #76
The political SCOTUS Sessuch Feb 28 #31
GET OUT!! birdographer Feb 28 #32
If the president is immune from prosecution, then Biden should remove that Conservative justices immediately Orrex Feb 28 #35
Exactly. This is our only saving grace here, that Biden is currently POTUS onetexan Feb 29 #63
These a-holes will end up ruling only repug predzeldents are immune... Justice matters. Feb 29 #51
Was there even a shred of doubt that this would happen? Orrex Feb 28 #34
the fascist majority on the court is filthy Marthe48 Feb 28 #36
Ellie Mystal on (Righteous) Fire PTL_Mancuso Feb 28 #37
37 months and counting republianmushroom Feb 29 #40
Hopefully we can all agree at this point that when we get back control of all branches again... ColinC Feb 29 #41
Is information provided on whether this decision was 6-3 or 5-4? AdamGG Feb 29 #42
This is not a decision Shrek Feb 29 #56
Thanks, I didn't realize that a minority of justices can decide to hear a case. AdamGG Feb 29 #74
Oh! So that's what y'all were upset about! As I just returned someone posted being upset at SCOTUS, but not why... electric_blue68 Feb 29 #43
It is my understanding that Jack Smith requested this move. HUAJIAO Feb 29 #44
Yes, but back in December, giving them plenty of time to rule and not be... brush Feb 29 #52
Thanks for the clarification. HUAJIAO Feb 29 #75
Watched Lawrence Tribe's take on it. He says they will not rule tfg has immunity and this way the right and PortTack Feb 29 #47
Melissa Murray had an interesting comment Deminpenn Feb 29 #60
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 29 #48
Justice delayed is justice denied SouthernDem4ever Feb 29 #61
Biden should start raining executive orders ... Novara Feb 29 #64
This should piss off this administration orangecrush Feb 29 #67
But it won't. Novara Feb 29 #71
The fix is in, but DownriverDem Feb 29 #68
I am pissed at this LetMyPeopleVote Feb 29 #72
Is the federal trial actually stayed? Deminpenn Mar 1 #77

agingdem

(7,853 posts)
8. I think Trump is going to lose the 2024 election
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 09:07 PM
Feb 28

trial or no trial...he's pretty much under performing in every the primary...yes, he got 60% in Michigan but Michigan has about 8.2 million Republican registered voters and yet only 1.1 million Republicans voted in the primary..that's not good..there's a reason 3/4 of the registered voters stayed home...

markodochartaigh

(1,145 posts)
28. I don't think that there is any way that he could win the popular vote.
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 10:04 PM
Feb 28

Of course that isn't the way that we choose presidents. The electoral college is another matter, he might have a chance there. And, of course, the Republicans are planning to get the election tossed to the House. If it goes to either the House or the supreme court it seems likely that he will have the votes.

agingdem

(7,853 posts)
38. in 2020 Trump, Barr, and DeJoy knew in early summer Trump was
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 11:19 PM
Feb 28

going to lose so they did their damnedest to "fix" the election in Trump's favor...Trump was bloviating to his rally morons the only way he could lose is if the election was rigged...Barr was throwing shade on mail-in ballots, and DeJoy was slowing the mail, trashing mailer sorters, and removing mailboxes..and then there was Giuliani, Bannon, and Stone "advising" Trump to declare victory on election night before the votes were counted...all of that happened and Biden still won...

fast forward 2024...Trump's MAGA base is stagnant...Republicans in the swing states are sitting out the primaries, Trump is under criminal indictment, he's an adjudicated rapist/guilty of tax fraud and he's financially fucked.. his rallies are sparse, he's spewing Nazi/racist vomit and the MSM is no longer his fawning bitch, parsing his verbal dreck..now he's "unhinged/deranged, underperforming"..when FOX is fact- checking Trump's bilge in real time that's not a good sign..

PortTack

(32,789 posts)
45. It's more complicated than it seems. And even harder to do now with an update to the electoral count act
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 03:48 AM
Feb 29

You can google it, it’s really easy to read and understand.

Also, it won’t be the current house that counts the votes, it will be the newly elected congress, which with every passing day, the dem majority grows.

markodochartaigh

(1,145 posts)
53. The Electoral Count Act
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 05:17 AM
Feb 29

is great but the current Republican party is committed to winning at all costs. Far too often those who are prepared to cheat actually win.

PlutosHeart

(1,286 posts)
49. This is why
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 04:02 AM
Feb 29

imho they took this to twist it into knots leaving little holes for him to slither through.
I wish I cold be optimistic but am not feeling that way. I see how they go against what is overwhelmingly what the country wants. They do not care. And if they have people willing to shoot us or lock us up or whatever, game over. That is how it is done in some other countries.
They want this at any cost.

drray23

(7,637 posts)
19. which he does not need anyway.
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 09:31 PM
Feb 28

He is very wealthy. His wife Elaine Chao is the heiress of a shipping magnate. She has hundreds of millions.

gab13by13

(21,385 posts)
6. 130 days to decide if a president can murder someone.
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 09:00 PM
Feb 28

Open your eyes people, this has never been about immunity, it has always been about delay.

Jack Smith asked the Supreme Court to take the appeal right after the district court gave its decision. The Supreme Court denied Smith's appeal to take the immunity case, but sent it back to the Appeals Court. Then the Supreme Court decides, well maybe, it will take the appeal after all.

Jack Smith's J6 trial is dead in the water.

Time Mattered.

iluvtennis

(19,868 posts)
11. My thoughts exactly. SCOTUS denied Smith's request for them to take the appeal back in December, but
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 09:18 PM
Feb 28

now they approve TSF's request - some crazy shit.

PortTack

(32,789 posts)
46. And...that's exactly what the history books will say. Along with the most corrupt SC EVER!
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 03:53 AM
Feb 29

Roberts…what a fool. All about wanting to save the reputation of the court all the while calling for more shovels and diggers. I swear, they and the gqp must hold weekly seminars on how to shoot yourself in the foot.

PITIFUL!

jaxexpat

(6,844 posts)
55. After AG appointment 2021, every microsecond the DOJ didn't devote to jailing Trump was dereliction.
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 07:42 AM
Feb 29

That fact will become ever more obvious as the horserace to November thunders along. While Trump should be long since settled into his cell, crayon in hand, writing his memoirs, he'll, instead, be clinging to and confuscating* every news cycle he can peddle. He'll lose the election but since the Republicans control committee leadership and speakership in the house they'll be openly conspiring with the USSC to whittle away at western democracy. Because that's what the reliable opposition does, right?

* a vocalized madness designed to confuse and obfuscate simultaneously. Some call it lying, others call it simply "Trump", while still others, most really, sense with great certainty that it's a 21st century variant of the timeless social disease and mortal sin of the democratized, MAGA: free speech of fools.

MOMFUDSKI

(5,627 posts)
57. Dead in the water only if the goods stay kept
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 08:02 AM
Feb 29

under wraps. Smith leaks every last word using the press. This is a battle for democracy and we must fight as dirty as necessary. There are no laws left. Think Ellsworth

Botany

(70,567 posts)
9. Trump's defense has 2 parts
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 09:13 PM
Feb 28

1) The Bill Barr defense "You can't charge a sitting President with a crime.

2) I have immunity because I was President and anything I did as President is covered by
my claim of immunity even stuff I did after
I left the White House. See stolen documents.




THE COURT IS GOING TO LET TRUMP RUN
OUT THE CLOCK.

Court packing and paying off Supreme Court Justices works in stopping our democracy.

Thomas, Robert's, Alito, Goursch, Kavanaugh, and Coney Island should never have been on
the Supreme Court in the 1st place.



WestMichRad

(1,336 posts)
16. All of them
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 09:24 PM
Feb 28

You can be sure that TSF’s “defense” includes motion to dismiss… in every trial he faces.
Whether the eventual ruling on this case applies to other cases, well that remains to be seen.

BumRushDaShow

(129,378 posts)
18. This shouldn't impact the NY civil and criminal cases
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 09:31 PM
Feb 28

(which were based on activities BEFORE he was sworn in)

agingdem

(7,853 posts)
24. January 6...
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 09:44 PM
Feb 28

Last edited Wed Feb 28, 2024, 10:35 PM - Edit history (1)

the document case is about criminal retention of top secret documents..that happened after he left office..

agingdem

(7,853 posts)
27. she's been ruling against Trump lately
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 09:54 PM
Feb 28

so let's see what happens...also we're assuming the the asshole 5 on the SC will do Trump a solid...if they do they render themselves obsolete..

Novara

(5,851 posts)
62. It will delay the stolen documents case too because he claimed immunity.
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 09:00 AM
Feb 29

Yes, it's fucking ridiculous - he stole the documents after he was no longer president. But since he's claimed immunity, this case will also hinge on the Supremely Corrupt Court of the United States.

hadEnuf

(2,211 posts)
13. They play every perceived weakness against us.
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 09:20 PM
Feb 28

We have principles and take the high road and they do the opposite. Then right wing media brainwashes their minions to believe that we are the bad guys.

The SCOTUS should have been expanded.

Garland should have hit the road at the first hint of him wavering at what needed to be done.

We are playing by rules that simply don't exist for the right wing anymore and here is the result.

hurple

(1,306 posts)
14. I called it...
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 09:20 PM
Feb 28

I've stated several times here that SCOTUS would pull something like this, and was bullied, shouted down and made to feel pretty unwelcome for stating such... to the point that I pretty much quit posting about anything and almost didn't re-up my "membership" when it came due.

So, here's a big, "told ya so," to all those who hounded me.

The way to tell what a republican will do, in any situation, is to look at the action that will most help him, her, or another republican regardless of whether it is against precedent, law or common sense. This SCOTUS will find a way to declare his actions immune, but only for him, and they will twist all reality and logic and legality to do so. Guarantee!

LiberalFighter

(51,054 posts)
17. Lawrence O'Donnell offered positives for the order. That it is limited. I need to wrap my mind around it.
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 09:28 PM
Feb 28

TRUMP, DONALD J. V. UNITED STATES
(23A745)
The application for a stay presented to The Chief Justice is referred by him to the Court. The Special Counsel’s request to treat the stay application as a petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, and that petition is granted limited to the following question: Whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office. Without expressing a view on the merits,
this Court directs the Court of Appeals to continue withholding issuance of the mandate until the sending down of the judgment of this Court. The application for a stay is dismissed as moot.

The case will be set for oral argument during the week of April 22, 2024. Petitioner’s brief on the merits, and any amicus curiae briefs in support or in support of neither party, are to be filed on or before Tuesday, March 19, 2024. Respondent’s brief on the merits, and any amicus curiae briefs in support, are
to be filed on or before Monday, April 8, 2024. The reply brief, if any, is to be filed on or before 5 p.m., Monday, April 15, 2024.

Turbineguy

(37,364 posts)
20. This whole delay thing will backfire on Trump
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 09:31 PM
Feb 28

It makes him look guilty.

In the end, We the People have to protect ourselves.

moonshinegnomie

(2,478 posts)
21. im starting to hink extreme action is needed
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 09:32 PM
Feb 28

what used to be crazy talk is now starting to become what is needed.

maybe they can start trumps trial the day after and supreme court decision. let the lawyers know tha the trial starts july 1st . period. and if the court rules earlier than start the trial earlier. its not as if they havent had time to prepare.

and if the court grants TFG immunity then biden is free to take extreme action against both the conservative members of the court and TFG himself. lock them up in gitmo. after all a sitting president has immunity


IbogaProject

(2,834 posts)
58. They need time to craft it specifically to be only for T45
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 08:14 AM
Feb 29

The Gore vs ruling was written with the claim it wasn't precedent. I fear they will try and do that here.

bluestarone

(17,025 posts)
22. My way of thinking here is, We all thought that they were waiting on the Judges writing the DISSENTING opinion
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 09:39 PM
Feb 28

When IN FACT they were working on the best way to FUCK us ALL.

paparush

(7,964 posts)
23. Gore vs Bush
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 09:42 PM
Feb 28

Was settled in less than a week.

This corrupt, bought-and-sold, court is helping Trump run out the clock. It's grotesque.

Lonestarblue

(10,053 posts)
30. The MAGA court strikes again. There is no reason for them to hear this appeal.
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 10:16 PM
Feb 28

We have a Supreme Court trying to delay a criminal trial so that voters will not have the benefit of learning whether someone they might vote for is a convicted criminal. Their acceptance of this appeal is inexcusable. They had very little credibility, but even that is gone now. The Republicans hacks on the Court should be happy that they’ve given Trump the delays that he wants.

onenote

(42,748 posts)
39. Jack Smith apparently thought otherwise. Are we tossing him under the bus now?
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 11:55 PM
Feb 28

Smith was pretty clear in what he told the Court: "The immunity case presents “a fundamental question at the heart of our democracy” and that it is one that “only this Court can definitively resolve.”

Lonestarblue

(10,053 posts)
59. I'm not tossing Smith under the bus. He made that statement before the DC court ruled.
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 08:17 AM
Feb 29

With the DC court finally ruling, and many here saying it took so long because they wanted to make it bulletproof, all the SC needed to do was affirm their ruling. Instead they are now allowing Trump the delay he wanted, with the likelihood that no trial will start before the election since the SC may not release its decision until the end of the current term in June. Scheduling a trial, and I think I read 88 days for preparation, selecting a jury, and holding the trial takes months, not a few weeks. And we do not know how the DOJ would view starting a trial a few weeks before an election.

onenote

(42,748 posts)
65. He essentially repeated when he proposed that the Court grant cert
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 09:03 AM
Feb 29

AFTER the DC Circuit ruled. The one thing he didn’t do is what many are complaining that the the court didn’t do — he didn’t suggest they treat Trump’s application for stay as a cert petition and deny. Instead he told the court they should treat it as a cert petition and grant it. I don’t blame him because it always was all but inevitable that on a case as significant as this that the court would decide to hear it.

bluestarone

(17,025 posts)
69. Yea BUT did Smith ask for almost a 2 month delay?
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 10:52 AM
Feb 29

HELL NO! THIS is 100% on this SC! Don't try to blame Smith. I'm tired of, well Smith asked for this bullshit! THIS SC is 100% allowing TFG delays for one purpose, no trial before election. Talk about fingers on the scale of justice.

onenote

(42,748 posts)
76. He asked for a one month schedule. He got a two month
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 07:04 PM
Feb 29

I wish he had gotten what he asked for but I doubt he is surprised at the result. I’m not bashing him. I am questioning those who ignore the fact that smith’s options were limited by the near inevitability of the court taking a case of this significance

Sessuch

(106 posts)
31. The political SCOTUS
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 10:20 PM
Feb 28

SCOTUS has jumped headlong into the political arena. They are still trying to save Trump from judgment.

birdographer

(1,337 posts)
32. GET OUT!!
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 10:20 PM
Feb 28

There is no way they are considering this (obviously they are). If they think presidents are immune from prosecution, I hope Biden takes full advantage of this and exterminates this pest for once and for all.

Orrex

(63,220 posts)
35. If the president is immune from prosecution, then Biden should remove that Conservative justices immediately
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 10:29 PM
Feb 28

onetexan

(13,057 posts)
63. Exactly. This is our only saving grace here, that Biden is currently POTUS
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 09:00 AM
Feb 29

If that's the case POTUS has immunity for rest of his life & he can do whatever without impunity then he shld do as he needs to to save democracy:
1- remove the conservative partisan SCOTUS who voted for immunity for the Con, and fill them w moderate & liberal justices
2- remove all RWers in Congress
3- set laws to ban all guns for civilians except those used for hunting & with licens
4- restore reporoductive rights
And on & on.... all liberal causes

Lastly he can then order SCOTUS to reverse the Presidential immunity to only while in office.😎


Orrex

(63,220 posts)
34. Was there even a shred of doubt that this would happen?
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 10:28 PM
Feb 28

I'm surprised that Thomas didn't declare Trump president by fiat.

 

PTL_Mancuso

(276 posts)
37. Ellie Mystal on (Righteous) Fire
Wed Feb 28, 2024, 11:05 PM
Feb 28

I don't have the video, but if you had msnbc on a short while ago you heard him completely excoriate Corrupt REPUBLICAN Supreme Court Justices. in no uncertain terms and I feel more than inclined to agree.

Not sure if I've got his phraseology correct, but it did contain those words (i.e. Corrupt REPUBLICAN Supreme Court Justices[) in that approximate order uttered with extreme insistence.

ColinC

(8,327 posts)
41. Hopefully we can all agree at this point that when we get back control of all branches again...
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 12:08 AM
Feb 29

We should reform the fuck out of the Supreme Court, add at least ten more justices and create an enforceable ethics code for them.

AdamGG

(1,294 posts)
42. Is information provided on whether this decision was 6-3 or 5-4?
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 12:19 AM
Feb 29

It seems totally corrupt to not rule on this when Jack Smith requested it in December if it WAS something that they were willing to consider. It would be interesting to know if the decisions in December and now were 6-3 or 5-4 because 5-4 would mean that one of the Rethug justices ruled against Trump and just one more is needed to reject the immunity claim. If it was 6-3, it could be a higher hurdle.

Refusing to rule on the issue in December and then agreeing to take it up now is a lot like Mitch McConnell refusing to have hearings for a replacement for Antonin Scalia when he died in February because it was too close to an election, but then ultra-fast tracking the hearings when Ruth Bader Ginsburg died on September 18th, 6 weeks before an election. It's pathetic that the "conservative" SCOTUS members are now as blatantly partisan as the Senate.

This country could really use a new constitutional convention to get rid of the electoral college and introduce term limits and conflict of interest rules to the Supreme Court and a bunch of other things.

Shrek

(3,983 posts)
56. This is not a decision
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 07:54 AM
Feb 29

They've just agreed to hear the arguments. For that at least 4 justices are required.

AdamGG

(1,294 posts)
74. Thanks, I didn't realize that a minority of justices can decide to hear a case.
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 02:38 PM
Feb 29

I didn't know how this works, but it seems odd that 5 justices can decide that a case doesn't merit consideration, but that 4 justices get to overrule the 5.

electric_blue68

(14,932 posts)
43. Oh! So that's what y'all were upset about! As I just returned someone posted being upset at SCOTUS, but not why...
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 01:19 AM
Feb 29

Oh, fuck that.

Let's hope some shred of judicial ?decorum/understanding/decency/???remains so that some of those 6 will do the right thing in the end!

He's a fucking former, insurrectionist stirring President, NOT a freaking King! 😤😤😤😤😤😤😤😤

brush

(53,840 posts)
52. Yes, but back in December, giving them plenty of time to rule and not be...
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 04:40 AM
Feb 29

up against an election. With this move, SCOTUS will hear it, BUT NOT UNTIL APRIL 22, THEN THEY HAVE TO DECIDE, WHICH COULD ADD EVEN MORE WEEKS OF DELAY AND EVEN CLOSER TO THE REPUBLICAN CONVENTION.

The Roberts court, already loaded with corrupt justices, makes it clear IMO, that they are in the tank for trump.

PortTack

(32,789 posts)
47. Watched Lawrence Tribe's take on it. He says they will not rule tfg has immunity and this way the right and
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 04:00 AM
Feb 29

His attorneys will have no further place to go.

He also was very upset as we are that they didn’t fast track this and said justice delayed is Justice denied.

Deminpenn

(15,290 posts)
60. Melissa Murray had an interesting comment
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 08:40 AM
Feb 29

She said that when Justice Pan of the DC circuit asked the Seal Team 6 question, that might have gotten the ear of at least one of the SCOTUS' 3 liberal justices and made her want to hear the case.

Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

SouthernDem4ever

(6,617 posts)
61. Justice delayed is justice denied
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 08:44 AM
Feb 29

This is the most corrupt SCOTUS we have ever had. I don't expect anything moral or ethical to come out of at least Thomas and Alito who are just paid stooges of the right wing puppetmasters. If they dare try and give Donald Dump a pass, then I hope Joe Biden takes that new power and runs with it. He'll have 6 months to do whatever he wants won't he?

Novara

(5,851 posts)
64. Biden should start raining executive orders ...
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 09:03 AM
Feb 29

... to protect trans people, to protect women, to reinstall affirmative action, to protect the right to contraception, and to override the Roe decision among other things. Forgive all student loans. Outlaw gasoline sales.

Go for broke, Joe.

I'll bet they rule a president doesn't have immunity after all. And in record time.

Novara

(5,851 posts)
71. But it won't.
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 11:53 AM
Feb 29

Goddamn Democrats are far too cautious. They're always afraid of what the other guys will do. Well, guess what? the other guys are going to screw you no matter what you do, so why not take some fucking bold action for once? Make them fight you. In the meantime, people will love what you are trying to do FOR THEM.

Gah. I despair.

Deminpenn

(15,290 posts)
77. Is the federal trial actually stayed?
Fri Mar 1, 2024, 08:34 AM
Mar 1

I heard Weissman say that SCOTUS could decide to hear the case (takes 4 votes), but not issue a stay (5 votes).

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court agrees to c...