Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,675 posts)
Fri Mar 1, 2024, 04:21 PM Mar 1

Appeals court ruling means over 100 Jan. 6 rioters may be resentenced

Source: Washington Post

NATIONAL SECURITY
Appeals court ruling means over 100 Jan. 6 rioters may be resentenced

By Rachel Weiner and Spencer S. Hsu
Updated March 1, 2024 at 12:40 p.m. EST | Published March 1, 2024 at 11:22 a.m. EST

A federal appeals court on Friday overturned a sentencing enhancement used against Jan. 6 defendants charged with felony obstruction, a decision that means that over 100 convicted rioters may have to be resentenced.

The decision came from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on Friday when it upheld the felony conviction of a Jan. 6 defendant who stormed the U.S. Capitol, reaffirming a charge also lodged against former president Donald Trump that will soon be debated by the Supreme Court.

It’s not clear what benefit retired Air Force lieutenant colonel Larry R. Brock Jr. or any other Jan. 6 defendant will receive because of the ruling. Enhancements raise the range of suggested sentences judges must consider. D.C. judges usually sentence below those guidelines, and regularly make clear that their punishments would be the same without the enhancement.

The ruling could have an impact in plea negotiations, eliminating one bargaining chip used by prosecutors when encouraging defendants to plead guilty without a trial.

{snip}

By Rachel Weiner
Rachel Weiner covers federal courts in Washington, D.C. and Richmond, Va. Twitter https://twitter.com/rachelweinerwp

By Spencer Hsu
Spencer S. Hsu is an investigative reporter, two-time Pulitzer finalist and national Emmy Award nominee. Hsu has covered homeland security, immigration, Virginia politics and Congress. Twitter https://twitter.com/hsu_spencer

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/03/01/appeal-obstruction-trump-january-sixth/

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

jimfields33

(16,032 posts)
4. Basically illegal to use enhanced punishment in DC.
Fri Mar 1, 2024, 04:29 PM
Mar 1

Many had too much jail time. The judge was a President Obama appointment.

24601

(3,963 posts)
11. Here's a link to a free Politico Article that has a good summary of the appeal.
Mon Mar 4, 2024, 10:12 AM
Mar 4

A three-judge panel from the DC Circuit of the US Courts of Appeals overturned, by a 3-0 vote, enhancements that sometimes added more than a year to Jan 6th sentences. Two judges were appointed by President Obama and the third by President Clinton.

The basis for the decision is that adding enhancements for interfering with "the administration of justice" was an inappropriate application of that provision. The ruling will apply to more than 100 defendants,

The government's has three options:
1. Do not appeal, or
2. Appeal for an En banc hearing of all active judges not disqualified from the case on the DC Circuit, or
3. Appeal to the US Supreme court.


https://www.politico.com/news/2024/03/01/some-jan-6-sentences-were-improperly-enhanced-appeals-court-rules-00144403


NBachers

(17,150 posts)
8. Shit, most of these peckerwoods deserved three times what they were sentenced to. And where's the conspiracy charges?
Fri Mar 1, 2024, 05:05 PM
Mar 1

Every damn one of them had to engage in a series of behaviors with other people to travel there and commit the crimes they committed.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Appeals court ruling mean...