Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TeamProg

(6,305 posts)
Sun Mar 3, 2024, 01:56 PM Mar 3

Fears of environmental disaster rise as ship sinks after Houthi attack

Source: WaPo

By Jennifer Hassan
Updated March 3, 2024 at 12:11 p.m. EST|Published March 3, 2024 at 9:18 a.m. EST

A cargo ship sank in the Red Sea after an attack by Houthi militants, taking some 21,000 metric tons of fertilizer down with it, posing a significant environmental risk to one of the world’s busiest waterways and the home of many coral reefs.

The Rubymar was struck by an anti-ballistic missile fired by the Iranian-backed Houthis on Feb. 18 and sank early Saturday after “slowly taking on water” since the attack, U.S. Central Command said on social media early Sunday local time.

“The approximately 21,000 metric tons of ammonium phosphate sulfate fertilizer that the vessel was carrying presents an environmental risk in the Red Sea,” Centcom said, adding that the ship “also presents a subsurface impact risk to other ships transiting the busy shipping lanes of the waterway.”

The ship’s sinking “will cause an environmental disaster,” the Yemeni government said in a separate statement.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/03/03/rubymar-houthi-attack-red-sea/



Oh, FUCK!

Just another environmental disaster... move along.

The environmental danger of fertilizer contents was not reported earlier in LBN. Only that the Rubymar was the first ship to sink after rocket fire.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fears of environmental disaster rise as ship sinks after Houthi attack (Original Post) TeamProg Mar 3 OP
It took over 10 days to sink after being hit? KS Toronado Mar 3 #1
That ship was an environmental time bomb wherever it would be towed. Nobody wanted it in their waters. Eugene Mar 3 #3
And then it left an 18-mile long oil slick BumRushDaShow Mar 3 #2

KS Toronado

(17,383 posts)
1. It took over 10 days to sink after being hit?
Sun Mar 3, 2024, 02:16 PM
Mar 3

Seems like there was enough time to run it aground to keep it from sinking while making repairs.
Or was it over insured?

Eugene

(61,969 posts)
3. That ship was an environmental time bomb wherever it would be towed. Nobody wanted it in their waters.
Sun Mar 3, 2024, 02:57 PM
Mar 3

As the area is an active war zone, it is hard to find a salvage crew willing to go there.
The ship and its cargo was of relatively low value. Higher value container ships
and tankers are avoiding the Suez/Red Sea route. Finally, the forces from flooding
alone broke the ship apart in the calmest of seas. It was too fragile.

Beaching an already broken ship full of nitrogen-rich fertilizer would bring
a catastrophic algae bloom and oil spill on somebody's shore. No one volunteered.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Fears of environmental di...