Biden administration finalizes rule cutting credit card late fees
Source: ABC News
March 5, 2024, 5:00 AM
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau finalized a rule Tuesday that will cut the typical credit card late fee to $8 from $32.
The financial regulator estimates the move will save American families $10 billion every year -- an average savings of $220 annually for more than 45 million people who are charged late fees when they don't pay their statements by the due date.
"Today's rule ends the era of big credit card companies hiding behind the excuse of inflation when they hike fees on borrowers and boost their own bottom lines," CFPB Director Rohit Chopra said in a statement.
The agency said its new rule closes a loophole in a federal law called the CARD Act that allowed major credit card issuers to charge customers growing fees when they were late on their payments. Over time, those late charges ballooned to as much as $41. The new rule would cap them at $8. It would also prevent card issuers from automatically increasing fees based on inflation.
Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/biden-administration-finalizes-rule-cutting-credit-card-late/story?id=107799462
Link to CFPB Director STATEMENT - Statement of CFPB Director Rohit Chopra on the Final Rule to Close the Credit Card Late Fee Loophole
Link to CFPB final Rule NEWS RELEASE - CFPB Bans Excessive Credit Card Late Fees, Lowers Typical Fee from $32 to $8
Baitball Blogger
(46,770 posts)Johnny2X2X
(19,211 posts)Not credit card companies. He's signed thousands of things just like this, that protect regular people.
The interest needs to be cut. It is usury. Biden's bill that Bush jr signed is what put in place 30% and more interest.
BumRushDaShow
(129,692 posts)It's controlled by some states but Congress would need to pass something like that and they haven't (for obvious "lobbying" reasons).
dalton99a
(81,648 posts)Minnesota usury law capped the states interest rates on loans at 12 percent. Under Nebraska usury law, banks could charge up to 18 percent. Minnesota banks imposed annual fees to make up the difference. First of Omaha then offered credit cards with no annual fees to Minnesota residents, for which Marquette sued in violation of Minnesota usury law.
In an opinion written by Justice William J. Brennan, Jr., the Supreme Court ruled that nationally chartered banks could charge the legal interest rates in their home states and export those rates to out-of-state customers. The Courts interpretation of the National Bank Act held that state usury laws did not apply to nationally chartered banks.
The Marquette ruling paved the way for the 1980 Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act, or DIDMCA. Section 521 of DIDMCA granted state-chartered banks the same right as nationally chartered banks to export their interest rates.
https://wallethub.com/edu/cc/usury-laws/25568
BumRushDaShow
(129,692 posts)incorporate in certain states that allow some high (max) interest rate (South Dakota being a biggy).
GoodRaisin
(8,930 posts)All these charges that prey on the poor need to go.
Happy Hoosier
(7,437 posts)Usurial rates are awful, of course, but the alternative might be that the poor lose access to unsecured credit.
That might be a terrible thing in some sense, but it would definitely have a significant impact.
Warpy
(111,388 posts)Silly me, I though 18+% interest was enough for them. The fees were abusive, to say the least.
Since then, I've used cash, checks, and an ATM card. I haven't missed a card company's hand in my pocket.
Happy Hoosier
(7,437 posts)... and never carry a balance.
I use credit cards for almost every purchase. I treat them like debit cards (except the one I use for business travel). I do not buy anything I cannot pay cash for. I do not pay fees (other than annual fees on my premium travel card), and I never pay interest. I pay the balance in full before the closing date and due date every month (I actually pay weekly).
In return, I get substantial benefit from the card rewards. This approach ONLY makes sense if one is able to pay off the card every month and actually does so. Once one is paying interest, the justification evaporates.
Warpy
(111,388 posts)I have bought those so seldom that the mild inconvenience of writing a check isn't that big a deal.
Health problems prevent me from having the kind of fun that requires more than the limit on my ATM. Plus, the ATM cards are appreciated by businesses, they cost the business less than credit cards do. I do have a card on my brokerage account, but that's for emergencies. I haven't activated it over the past 18 years.
When those junk fees came out, I saw the beginning of a massive scam, high junk fees encouraging people who'd overspent to pay the minimum month after month, interest continuing to accrue, keeping them in debt forever. I was right, too. A lot of people did run into trouble with those cards, especially since falling purchasing power meant they had to use them for essentials.
Happy Hoosier
(7,437 posts)But even if you just use the "cash back" feature on cards, it can save real money. The average American spends over $900 a year on increased prices due to card swipe fees. You're paying that if you use credit cards or not. You may be paying less or more than that, of course, depending upon your personal spend. The point is that the cost of credit cards is built into the economy. Using a cash back card can cut that cost in half, or more.
But again, none of that matters if there are carried balances on the cards. For folks who are relying on credit cards for daily living, it's a very hard hole to climb out of. I do admire folks who KNOW they are not "credit card people" and avoid using them altogether. They are very dangerous if not used properly.
Warpy
(111,388 posts)I neer expected to go 30 years without a credit card.