Doesn't that already violate their "No Labels" name?

Or do they not GAS (Give A Sh.t) with the impending cognitive dissonance?

In this house, we believe:

1. All lives matter.


2. Women’s rights are human rights, mostly.


3. No human is illegal, although some are unwelcome.


4. Science is real. Or maybe not.


5. Love is pleasant.


6. Kindness is a thing.

There has to be more to this than just throwing the election to Trump. Who gets richer in this grift?

They have no candidate. No ground organization to get on the ballot in all 50 states. So how exactly are they not spoilers?

since they don't seem to have any luck getting anyone who might be viable.


Perhaps they can find some county commissioners for their 'ticket' ?

LOL

No Labels, With No Candidate, Says Yes to a 2024 Presidential Campaign

Matt Welch; Fri, March 8, 2024 at 7:09 AM PST

No Labels says it's about to jump into the 2024 presidential race.

A day prior to a secret delegate meeting that's not a convention, the centrist nonprofit that isn't a political party indicated Thursday that the members whom it won't name are almost certainly going to agree with the backers it refuses to disclose that a non-existent unity ticket to be chosen via undetermined process should nonetheless be green-lit to enter a presidential contest that No Labels swears it can plausibly win and definitely not tip to Donald Trump.

"We expect our delegates to encourage the process to continue," No Labels Chief Strategist Ryan Clancy told The Wall Street Journal.

The Joe Lieberman–chaired organization remains convinced, all contrary evidence notwithstanding, that what disgruntled voters most crave as an alternative to Beltway politics as usual is a centrist coalition of establishment office-holders who can out-hawk both major parties on foreign policy.

Bulk of article at: https://www.yahoo.com/news/no-labels-no-candidate-says-150938655.html

Here is the No Labels site and the link to the Meet the Team page.

https://www.nolabels.org/meettheteam

You think they’re morons now, but just wait until you read about them. 😂😂

Ask them why their major funders are also far right Trump supporters.

Up until now, no labels has been synonymous with no substance.
They've got no organization, no candidates, no platform, no plan to move forward.
Just plenty of smoke and mirrors.

it seems to me that it is just another way for well-connected third tier politicos to scam money off of our "political" system. Much like many of the Republican candidates who jump into the primaries to promote their book or just scam some money only to drop out without causing a ripple in the swamp.
One unfortunate side effect which I don't see talked about is that third party candidates may bring out some Republican never-Trump voters who might otherwise stay home. These voters will probably vote down ballot for Republicans. If they had stayed home it might have helped the Democratic candidates.

Enough said

Nobody remembers him.

He is the leading driver behind the No Labels group

Have always thought that Lieberman as VPOTUS candidate harmed the 2000 Al Gore more than Ralph Nader but less than the USSC.

Funded by billionaire and russian dark money

Anyone with genuine political savvy knows that one cannot build a party from the top down, but the bottom up. If they want to start a third party that can be effective, ignore the White House. Ignore the governor seats. Even ignore state legislatures. Start with your local city council and school boards and dog catchers. Then start working your way up.

Nobody with a brain takes such obvious dilettantes seriously.

Seems about the quality they'd attract.