Seem so problematic?

He has zero loyalty to the US.

By putting our intelligence secrets directly into Musk's hands, we are cutting out the circuitous pathway now needed to divulge it.

should take the next flight on one of the ships that WE paid for. Public funds created the space program and developed the technology. It would be appropriate if WE benefited as opposed to making morbidly rich people even richer, while we get poorer. How many billions does one need? I say NONE. Tax the out of existence.

its board of directors ousting their Nazi South African CEO.

Sources were unnamed and the comment from Northrop Grumman spokesperson that was here was in response to a question obviously not the initial break or should I say leak.


Who leaked this? Musk?

Who benefits from a statement like this? SpaceX, musk, but not US intelligence. I hope you’re right. Thanks for all you do for DU.

Despite what the article implies, I suspect this is what SpaceX will be providing for Northrop Grumman.

The interesting part is the report that Northrop Grumman instead of Lockheed Martin is SpaceX's "partner".

in some cases, Falcon Heavy.

There may be other vendors I expect, but this is all supposed to be "hush hush top secret".

I posted about what might have been an earlier mention of this a month ago (assuming this is talking about the same contract or maybe a parallel one) - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143210174

is going to team up with a person who has admitted abusing drugs, has expressed pro-Russian sentiments, and is deeply in the influence of the Chinese government.

What could go wrong?