US is building first new nuclear warhead in decades
Source: UK Independent
5 hours ago
The United States is building its first new nuclear warhead in decades but will do so without nuclear testing, according to energy department officials on Wednesday.
The warhead, known as the W93, is set to be used on ballistic missiles launched from submarines. It is being built using funds, $19.8bn, requested by the National Nuclear Security Agency (NNSA) for the 2025 fiscal year, energy secretary Jennifer Granholm and NNSA Administrator Jill Hruby told the Senate Armed Services Committee, according to The Washington Times.
The warhead is in its early design stages at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, the main site for the Manhattan Project which built the first nuclear bombs during World War II. Production on the warhead is set to begin in the middle of the next decade, the officials testified.
The issue of updating its nuclear capabilities is a top priority for the Pentagon and the nuclear-armed submarines are central to the US nuclear forces. Other parts of the strategic capabilities include bombers and intercontinental ballistic missiles.
Read more: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/pentagon-nuclear-warheads-weapons-energy-b2531501.html
NowsTheTime
(697 posts)cstanleytech
(26,318 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(12,423 posts)Much as I hate nuclear weapons, I'm not naive enough to think that if we don't keep up with Russia and China, we'll be subject to nuclear blackmail.
All this money spent on developing warheads, whether, Russia, China, or the US, could be spent on improving the lives of worldwide peoples.
bahboo
(16,353 posts)ancianita
(36,132 posts)But being right, we know that these nuclear powers use testing as nuclear threats themselves, and knowing that we still don't have the capability to actually stop ICBM attacks, our submarine nuclear capability has to expand. That sends the signal of our attack power were these failing superpowers made any desperate nuclear attack.
Better to have submarine nukes and not need them than to need them and not have them.
I just ran across this earlier statement in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists that they trust that Biden can best decide how to develop a layered missile capability.
To explore new arms control options, Biden should break with the policies of Bush, Obama, and Trump. Like Nixon, he should be prepared to negotiate with rivals limits on US missile defense ambitions in the interests of national security and international stability.
Biden cannot reverse the new era in missile defense, which is marked by Trumps words but ultimately defined by the new strategic problem of major power competition. However, Bidens team can develop a clear and balanced approach to missile defense that aligns US and allied capabilities with the presidents promises to meet future challenges, and that grounds policy in fact and science and strategic thinking.
https://thebulletin.org/2021/09/biden-should-guide-missile-defense-his-own-way/
Joe Biden has known much more than we ever could, and if he thinks this is the time to test and implement these, I trust him, too.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,423 posts)Thank you anciantia.
pfitz59
(10,389 posts)Question is, where?
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,423 posts)AZ8theist
(5,488 posts)That's the way it's done.
Warpy
(111,332 posts)they haven't tested anything so far. They're waiting for us to violate that treaty first. It's how they roll. We shouldn't take the bait.
Most testing is virtual testing and has been since before that treaty was signed. They are just going to have to keep doing that until Russia sets one off.
Redesigned components like the triggers are tested. Only the nuclear part, something that has probably not been redesigned, is not tested.