Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(129,525 posts)
Thu Apr 25, 2024, 07:57 AM Apr 25

Justice Clarence Thomas chooses not to recuse himself from another January 6-related case

Source: CNN Politics

Published 5:00 AM EDT, Thu April 25, 2024


CNN — Amid calls for Justice Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from a high-stakes case over whether Donald Trump has presidential immunity from criminal prosecution, the conservative jurist has made clear that he doesn’t plan to step aside – or even respond publicly to the appeals from Democrats and others.

The justice’s critics are all citing past efforts by his wife, Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, to reverse the 2020 presidential election in Trump’s favor and her attendance at the rally Trump held on January 6, 2021, shortly before the US Capitol attack. President Donald Trump speaks to supporters from The Ellipse near the White House on January 6, 2021, in Washington, DC.

Thus far, Thomas has given no sign that he intends to recuse himself from Trump v. US – or even explain his reasoning for remaining on the case, which the nine justices will hear arguments in on Thursday. Judicial ethics experts say that Thomas at least has an obligation to explain his decision not to recuse himself given the precedent set by other justices in the past.

“Reasonable people are questioning Justice Thomas’ partiality and I think I think he definitely owes the American people an explanation of why he is unbiased in these cases,” said Gabe Roth, executive director of Fix the Court, which has pushed for more transparency from the federal judiciary. “I think that’s a fairly low bar,” Roth added. “You think you’re unbiased, OK, tell us why.”

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/25/politics/clarence-thomas-january-6-case/index.html

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Clarence Thomas chooses not to recuse himself from another January 6-related case (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Apr 25 OP
Another reason... 2naSalit Apr 25 #1
Clarence Thomas is a horrible excuse for a human being. SalamanderSleeps Apr 25 #2
Court ethics reform and court expansion desperately needed Novara Apr 25 #3
The Supreme Court MOMFUDSKI Apr 25 #4
the best supreme court DENVERPOPS Apr 25 #13
The conservative wing of the court has zero credibility. They are illegitimate. jvill Apr 25 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author bluestarone Apr 25 #6
It's time The Wizard Apr 25 #7
Did anyone really expect that pig to develop any integrity? BigDemVoter Apr 25 #8
Did this guy ever have a conscience? Marthe48 Apr 25 #9
If you're surprised, you haven't been paying attention. (nt) Paladin Apr 25 #10
How About A Citizens Arrest HandmaidsTaleUntold Apr 25 #11
That futhermucker needs to be recused..... lastlib Apr 25 #12
Of course not Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 25 #14

2naSalit

(86,798 posts)
1. Another reason...
Thu Apr 25, 2024, 08:07 AM
Apr 25

Why we HAVE to elect only Dems in the House and Senate. We need a greater majority in the Senate so we can get rid of Thomas and the other fascists on the bench.

SalamanderSleeps

(591 posts)
2. Clarence Thomas is a horrible excuse for a human being.
Thu Apr 25, 2024, 08:20 AM
Apr 25

Thurgood Marshall was a justice only to be replaced by an injustice.

Thanks to George Bush.

See article from the Root:

The Messy Life of Clarence Thomas
Uncle Clarence has helped to destroy Affirmative Action. So let's be messy and look into the chaotic life of this long-serving Supreme Court Justice.

https://www.theroot.com/the-messy-life-of-clarence-thomas-the-evolution-of-pt-1849165127

Novara

(5,851 posts)
3. Court ethics reform and court expansion desperately needed
Thu Apr 25, 2024, 08:26 AM
Apr 25

No matter who is on the bench, it should NEVER be up to an individual justice to make these calls themselves. Recusal rules should be written into ethics reform. No decisions necessary - make it cut and dried. And the court should be expanded so that if a justice or two is recused, the court will still have plenty of members to make decisions. Having more justices make recusal less fraught.

Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Marthe48

(17,031 posts)
9. Did this guy ever have a conscience?
Thu Apr 25, 2024, 12:35 PM
Apr 25

If he did, which I doubt, I wonder if he sold himself out in increments or in one giant step?

lastlib

(23,290 posts)
12. That futhermucker needs to be recused.....
Thu Apr 25, 2024, 02:45 PM
Apr 25

from the Court---PERMANENTLY!

I am so SICK of him effing up our laws!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Justice Clarence Thomas c...