7 female Missouri House members say they were kept out of contraception debate
7 female Missouri House members say they were kept out of contraception debate
JASON HANCOCK
The Kansas City Star
It was a purely symbolic move when the Missouri House passed a resolution this week decrying the Obama administrations mandate that health insurance policies include birth-control coverage.
But it still managed to spark outrage from a group of seven female Democratic lawmakers, who said they were denied a chance to speak on an issue that affects them.
These women stood and waited to be recognized for two hours, said Rep. Tishaura Jones, a St. Louis Democrat. They never got a chance to speak on an issue that is unique to women.
Republicans pushed the resolution, arguing that the presidents policy announced as part of the federal health care law violates a constitutional right to religious freedom, since many religious groups object to the use of contraceptives, sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs.
Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2012/02/24/3448873/7-female-missouri-house-members.html#storylink=cpy
yellowcanine
(35,705 posts)And it is not just women. Men benefit from contraception as well. This issue has the potential to unleash a furious backlash. When people are mad they vote.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)not quailified for such a conversation since apparently the vagina is owed by the males in the goppers' society.
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)are not to be seen and heard from. To the thugs, they are second class citizens who do not even have a right to determine their own destinies and the destiny of their bodies.
What gets me are the conservative women's groups/politicians who are more than eager to throw women under the bus so that they can get a pat on the head for being "good little girls" for the men who are daily trying to strip women of their rights. Actually, it sickens me that there are women eager to do this.
crunch60
(1,412 posts)have been brainwashed for a very long time. like most of the women in my family. I am the only progressive and they pray for me every day! lol
They are taught to walk softly and carry lipstick. Well, I walk softly and carry a big stick.! Certainly as you stated, they need the approval of men who it seems, must make all the important decisions for them, including what they can and cannot do with their own bodies. We struggled for Roe v Wade, and I hate to see us regressing to the "dark ages".
randome
(34,845 posts)Herlong
(649 posts)Damn!
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)"walk softly and carry lipstick". Well put, crunch!
MsPithy
(809 posts)And, routinely, the doctors would not sterilize a single woman at all. I'm not kidding.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)My insurance required it. I had to prove I was sane before I could be sterilized.
shcrane71
(1,721 posts)was sent to her husband (in the waiting room), and required him to sign a document indicating that he gave his "permission" for the hysterectomy. She was 38 at the time. She was awfully pissed when she found out about that after the surgery.
MANative
(4,113 posts)How is it any less "unconstitutional" to make laws based on religious tenets and/or the canon law of any number of religions? They yell and scream when someone introduces even the hint of Sharia law, but how is this crap any different? 'Cause that's the effect and practice of what most of these new "personhood" amendments are about.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Let's push this even further Repubs... push it even further... maybe get rid of mammograms or maternity leave or something... That should work.
Crunchy Frog
(26,719 posts)Not only will they not get votes, but they won't get anything else either.
"Not tonight dear. I don't want a baby and you think contraception is a sin."
truthisfreedom
(23,169 posts)Men legislating control over women's bodies.
Xipe Totec
(43,892 posts)or your sister's, or your daughter's, or your spouses.
This is strictly a good ol' boys club.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)These a-holes are disgusting and their "kept" women are just as gross.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)No difference:
saras
(6,670 posts)I shouldn't have to explain that to anyone, ESPECIALLY religious people.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Justice wanted
(2,657 posts)on this issue in different regions.
cyberpj
(10,794 posts)We should start keeping track of the anti-union, anti-blue collar, anti-womens rights legislation coming from those states since the start of the Koch Bros move on US gov't.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)NeonDog
(118 posts)RepubliCONs, Tired of Attacking Brown People, Shift Attacks To Women.
shcrane71
(1,721 posts)Response to kpete (Original post)
Post removed
tooeyeten
(1,074 posts)The resolution passed 114-45 with the help of 12 Democrats.
Diehl pointed out that several women on both sides of the aisle got a chance to speak before the debate was ended. Overall, he said, more Democrats were recognized to speak than Republicans.
But seven women denied ability to voice concern? What's with Missouri?