White House, NSA weigh cybersecurity, personal privacy (WH blocks NSA from expanding monitoring)
The National Security Agency has pushed repeatedly over the past year to expand its role in protecting private-sector computer networks from cyberattacks but has been rebuffed by the White House, largely because of privacy concerns, according to administration officials and internal documents.
The most contentious issue was a legislative proposal last year that would have required hundreds of companies that provide critical services such as electricity generation to allow their Internet traffic be continuously scanned using computer threat data provided by the spy agency. The companies would have been expected to turn over evidence of potential cyberattacks to the government.
NSA officials portrayed these measures as unobtrusive ways to protect the nations vital infrastructure from what they say are increasingly dire threats of devastating cyberattacks.
But the White House and Justice Department argued that the proposal would permit unprecedented government monitoring of routine civilian Internet activity, according to documents and officials familiar with the debate. They spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe administration deliberations; internal documents reviewed by The Washington Post backed these descriptions.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/white-house-nsa-weigh-cyber-security-personal-privacy/2012/02/07/gIQA8HmKeR_story.html
That's because the good guys are in the WH.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)nor should they have removable media units.
truthisfreedom
(23,169 posts)Absolutely! Electrical systems should have their own network completely disconnected from the net.
usregimechange
(18,373 posts)Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)I used to work for a company you've heard of which sold a product which government or really big corporate entities use. One of the things I did was assist customers licensing the product. I have no idea why they didn't just give site-wide licenses. Anyway, we didn't get many calls requiring assistance with licensing but most of them were from the little rooms at military installations or testing facilities which, as a measure of security, had no internet access, had completely autonomous networks. All the licensing was on-line and they couldn't activate the product.
I fed the code they read me into something and it spit out their response code which they typed in manually.
Very nice folks. Everything punctuated with "Sir" or "Ma'am". One thing I take comfort in is that all the people that I dealt with in their little secure rooms always struck me a very professional, clear-minded people.
PB
Response to usregimechange (Original post)
safgertrt Message deleted by the DU Administrators