Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 02:17 PM Feb 2012

Hillary Clinton: Syria's Assad could be labeled a war criminal

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Tuesday that an argument could be made that Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad is a war criminal.

"There would be an argument to be made that he would fit into that category," Clinton told a Senate committee hearing, responding to a question from Senator Lindsey Graham as to whether Assad could be called a war criminal.

But she added that using such labels "limits options to persuade leaders to step down from power."

Clinton was also asked whether she thought Assad was on his way out eventually. "I do," she said. "I just don't know how to define eventually."

http://worldnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/28/10529610-hillary-clinton-syrias-assad-could-be-labeled-a-war-criminal

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton: Syria's Assad could be labeled a war criminal (Original Post) IDemo Feb 2012 OP
So could Bush & Cheney Hugabear Feb 2012 #1
Exactly, so I don't think she should be going there unless Obama plans to put teddy51 Feb 2012 #2
we let our war criminals skate. so there went any credibility we had leftyohiolib Feb 2012 #6
Looking into the wrong mirror? Dack Feb 2012 #11
In fact, if they intervene militarily in Syria without a proper UN resolution that would in itself Fool Count Feb 2012 #13
"Put the former Republican administration on trial for war crimes?" Or at least send to teddy51 Feb 2012 #14
+1 n/t Purveyor Feb 2012 #4
Agreed! Lint Head Feb 2012 #8
+1K and-justice-for-all Feb 2012 #16
Bringing up Bush and Cheney whenever war crimes are mentioned is really getting old. cstanleytech Feb 2012 #18
Yeah, we should just forget about them.. Fumesucker Feb 2012 #22
Yes of course. Thats exactly what I said after all cstanleytech Feb 2012 #26
My point being that once we stop mentioning them every time war crimes are brought up.. Fumesucker Feb 2012 #28
No, they wont be forgotten. cstanleytech Feb 2012 #30
It's the hypocrisy.. Fumesucker Feb 2012 #32
Hmm some good points you have though I still believe its getting a bit long in the tooth for people cstanleytech Feb 2012 #33
Whats the statute of limitation on war crimes? Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #25
None that I am aware of but its just that imo the invoking of Bush/Cheney cstanleytech Feb 2012 #27
Yeah. My 2nd childhood involved thousands of dead people too. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #35
Are you sure you dont mean horses? cstanleytech Feb 2012 #38
Let's try looking at ourselves Phlem Feb 2012 #3
Yeah, I'm not sure we should be waving that wand around. sofa king Feb 2012 #5
I so disagree. cstanleytech Feb 2012 #19
of course Phlem Feb 2012 #20
I dont think there is any government on this planet that doesnt practice its share of cstanleytech Feb 2012 #21
yes but the USA pretends to be the world's peacekeeper, Phlem Feb 2012 #23
Ya know I have seen people claim that cstanleytech Feb 2012 #29
The government will never Phlem Feb 2012 #31
She's the SOS, not the Attorney General. Beacool Feb 2012 #34
An absolutely cringe-worthy quote, Madam Secretary... BadtotheboneBob Feb 2012 #7
Who is Syria at war with? gratuitous Feb 2012 #9
"Could be" How about "should be," or even better, "is" (nt) apnu Feb 2012 #10
Why bother... just have Obama put him on our hit list. tk2kewl Feb 2012 #12
That's actually a pretty watered-down statement, considering her recent bellicose comments. David__77 Feb 2012 #15
Fine Hillary DonCoquixote Feb 2012 #17
We should listen to Hillary.. Fumesucker Feb 2012 #24
So what? This country's own war criminals are still walking free. BlueStater Feb 2012 #36
"Crimes against humanity" maybe but "war criminal" from her is just a sick joke. Nihil Feb 2012 #37
 

teddy51

(3,491 posts)
2. Exactly, so I don't think she should be going there unless Obama plans to put
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 02:23 PM
Feb 2012

Bush and Cheney on trial as well.

Dack

(5 posts)
11. Looking into the wrong mirror?
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 05:07 PM
Feb 2012

It's sheer hypocrisy to denounce another head of state for war crimes if yourself have blood on your hands for crimes for which you probably will be convicted at The Hague. Denouncing the former Republican administration for war crimes is easy but to ignore or to overlook the crimes that happen right now of the current Democratic administration because you are affiliated or sympathetic to them is just wrong. We should look into our own crimes and stop committing them.
(I don't suggest you belong to this kind of group, to be clear)
What should Obama do? Put the former Republican administration on trial for war crimes? He should do it but only if he applies the same principles to himself and his administration. If he or others are guilty has to be assessed by an uninvolved third party like the ICJ/ICC.

 

Fool Count

(1,230 posts)
13. In fact, if they intervene militarily in Syria without a proper UN resolution that would in itself
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 05:33 PM
Feb 2012

be a war crime worthy of prosecution in the Hague.

 

teddy51

(3,491 posts)
14. "Put the former Republican administration on trial for war crimes?" Or at least send to
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 06:03 PM
Feb 2012

the Hague if you don't have the stomach to deal with it.

cstanleytech

(26,361 posts)
18. Bringing up Bush and Cheney whenever war crimes are mentioned is really getting old.
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 07:50 PM
Feb 2012

Dont get me wrong, I dont disagree that they shouldnt be charged and in fact I support them being charged because I believe they did commit said war crimes but imo its time to stop bringing them up whenever it comes to alleged crimes of someone else or some other countries actions.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
22. Yeah, we should just forget about them..
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 09:57 PM
Feb 2012

Looking forward and not backward, water under the bridge, don't cry over spilt milk, etc, etc..

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
28. My point being that once we stop mentioning them every time war crimes are brought up..
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 10:28 PM
Feb 2012

Then their crimes will eventually be forgotten, eventually they will never be brought up.

Which is what's going to happen anyway, I'm just a stubborn old curmudgeon.

Serious question..

If you don't bring up Cheney, Bush, Rummy, et miserable al when war crimes are in the news then when *do* you bring them up?

They'll be deploying the snow plows in Hell before the M$M ever utter so much as a syllable about that subject..



cstanleytech

(26,361 posts)
30. No, they wont be forgotten.
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 10:45 PM
Feb 2012

Sure, Bush and Cheney did things they should be in jail for imo (or have their heads on a pike for) but what does mentioning them have to do with what is in this article itself?

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
32. It's the hypocrisy..
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 10:54 PM
Feb 2012

When an American official starts talking about "War crimes" a little voice in my head starts chanting "Shrubbie, Ctheney, Rumsferatu", I can't stop it.

The powers that be desperately want the entire decade forgotten.. Well, up to 2008 anyway. We went straight from Clinton to Obama with just a patch of fuzzy math in between, move along, nothing to see here and certainly nothing to remember.

It's up to us to remember and then when we do remember even here on DU people complain..

cstanleytech

(26,361 posts)
33. Hmm some good points you have though I still believe its getting a bit long in the tooth for people
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 11:17 PM
Feb 2012

to be invoking Bush and Cheney but as I said you have some good points so I'll just take some deep breaths when they do.

cstanleytech

(26,361 posts)
27. None that I am aware of but its just that imo the invoking of Bush/Cheney
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 10:27 PM
Feb 2012

at the drop of a hat in a kind of childish "but they started it" like whine has just gotten repetitive.
But hey who am I to argue with people wanting to relive their 2nd childhood *shrug*

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
3. Let's try looking at ourselves
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 02:24 PM
Feb 2012

mainly the Bush regime, before we start labeling others Hillary. Fix what's wrong at home first then you words might have weight.

-p

cstanleytech

(26,361 posts)
19. I so disagree.
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 07:55 PM
Feb 2012

I mean I disagree that we should ignore x's actions until x is addressed.
If we followed that logic with all crimes then until x murder case was solved the police shouldnt investigate any others, its just not a practical way imo for the police to be investigating crimes.
Sure we should always strive to see that those we believe are guilty are brought to justice (like Bush) but neglecting other cases in order to achieve a single goal is wasteful as it might be years (if ever) that Bush and cheney are brought before a court.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
20. of course
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 08:11 PM
Feb 2012

and my comment was a broad brush not meant to literally stop any action on wrong doings. Just trying to avoid the pot calling the kettle black situation. Hypocrisy has always turned me off. Especially if the subject is one they are guilty of.

I suspect we would have more credence on the world stage if we practiced what we preach.

-p

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
31. The government will never
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 10:48 PM
Feb 2012

claim that and a whole host of other things, let's pick one. Any water boarding deaths? We'll never know that.

It's easy to claim peacekeeper all the while building military bases around the world to "keep the peace." Have you seen how many military bases we have around Iran?

Anyway, it's been great banter cstanleytech. This has been one of the best discussions I've had on this group.

Stay safe and I've got yer back as with all the rest of my brothers and sisters.

Now it's time for me to go shoots me up some monster hoard and whip up magical spells, have a great night.

-p

BadtotheboneBob

(413 posts)
7. An absolutely cringe-worthy quote, Madam Secretary...
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 03:39 PM
Feb 2012

... considering, um, like, you-know-who and what-they-did.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
9. Who is Syria at war with?
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 04:46 PM
Feb 2012

And this isn't really an issue on which the United States has a whole thundering herd of credibility nowadays.

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
12. Why bother... just have Obama put him on our hit list.
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 05:09 PM
Feb 2012

We don't need no stinking badges...

or courts...

or criminal charges...

David__77

(23,635 posts)
15. That's actually a pretty watered-down statement, considering her recent bellicose comments.
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 06:15 PM
Feb 2012

Besides which, some Syrian opposition groups have already labeled Assad a "war criminal." So it would be nothing new. But the ICC has no jurisdiction over Syria, and will NOT have jurisdiction over it, because the UN security council will NOT refer this question to the ICC. So, anyone is free to say "war criminal," but it will be a mere taunt.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
17. Fine Hillary
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 07:38 PM
Feb 2012

Right after you report to Libya for starting a war and making the Islamists topple another government.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
24. We should listen to Hillary..
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 10:00 PM
Feb 2012

She knows war from firsthand experience of coming under sniper fire in Tuzla..

BlueStater

(7,596 posts)
36. So what? This country's own war criminals are still walking free.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 02:12 AM
Feb 2012

No one in the government even has the fucking courage to call them out for what they are.

Maybe we shouldn't be so quick to judge others until we apply those same standards to ourselves.

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
37. "Crimes against humanity" maybe but "war criminal" from her is just a sick joke.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 06:00 AM
Feb 2012

How many sovereign nations has he invaded?

How many bombs dropped on foreign civilians?

How many soldiers & marines deployed abroad?

How many cruise missiles launched into an independent nation?

How many illegal prisoners kidnapped, held for years and killed?


Yes, he's a first-class shit to a lot of his own people.
So was Saddam.
So was Gaddafi.
He's definitely committed crimes against innocent civilians in his own country.

Unlike the current and preceding Presidents of the USA though, he hasn't committed
the above crimes so STFU Hillary until you are prepared to publicly criticise *THEM*
in the same terms.


Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hillary Clinton: Syria's ...