Natasha Loder, Economist Journalist, Detained At Mitt Romney Event
A reporter for the Economist was handcuffed by police officers at Mitt Romney's campaign victory rally during the Michigan primary on Tuesday.
Natasha Loder, a Midwest reporter for the magazine, came into conflict with police at the event in Novi, MI after she tried to hear Romney's victory speech in person, instead of in a press filing center.
Chad Livengood, a reporter at the Lansing bureau of the Detroit News, initially tweeted that she had been arrested for sitting in a doorway at the crowded event, which reporters were being blocked from entering.
Livengood also snapped photos which showed a woman sitting on the floor, surrounded by police. He then clarified his earlier account. He said that he, Loder and other journalists had been blocked by Secret Service officials from entering the ballroom, even though there was space. Loder, he continued, had sat in a doorway in protest and been led away in handcuffs.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/28/reporter-arrested-romney-natasha-loder-economist_n_1308423.html
liberal N proud
(60,352 posts)If you are not vetted, you will not be allowed in because they will not allow anyone close to the candidate that might ask him unscripted/approved questions that might throw the candidate off script with his answers.
Because we all know the candidate can't go off script for fear his true identity would be displayed.
This is how they managed to keep bu$h protected from the media and questioning public.
rfranklin
(13,200 posts)Can't even handle a few rowdy journalists, how can he handle all the challenges of a world in turmoil?
liberal N proud
(60,352 posts)Because they know it will demonstrate he is not qualified.
90-percent
(6,834 posts)Brings back fond memories of the GWB public event press and public relations. Ahh the good ole days of Orwellian Free Speech Zones, usually in a chain link pen blocks from the event. The joys of being removed from a Public Presidential speech by the SS simply because of attending while suspected of being Democrat.
Ain't Republican Democracy great!
Hey, mitt, keep on resurrecting GWB totalitarian methods. I hear Karl Rove is seriously considering anointing himself Veep. He only has to worry about Charles Manson getting paroled and snatching that position away from him.
-Jim
Calm down, take a deep breath, the Rove speculation is based on nothing more than the literary license to write this post. I like making my points as hyperbolic as possible. I cop Dr. H.S. Thompson's writing riffs all the time.
oldhippydude
(2,514 posts)how will they handle the 3am news reporter
syberlion
(136 posts)and if that doesn't work, they'll buy the media outlet and fire him for "budgetary reasons"... Rmoney might just be the Bane of this country
truthisfreedom
(23,169 posts)olegramps
(8,200 posts)HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts). . . You Might Be a FASCIST!
woodsprite
(11,941 posts)The Wizard
(12,556 posts)seig heil to you all.
Suji to Seoul
(2,035 posts)"If you read the news even poorly, you'll notice your rights keep getting smaller and smaller every year. And rights are not rights if the government can take them away. The Bills of Rights are a list of temporary privileges."
It's been happening since Reagan's War on Drugs which is really a War on the Constitution.
Baby Bear
(124 posts)Hostility between the Republican candidates and the media is good for democracy (as well as Democrats).
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)She was trying to go where she wasn't supposed to go, then sat down, blocking a doorway. From what I've seen on other threads at DU, Ms. Loder is lucky she wasn't Tased into a coma, because she would have totally deserved that, and it would have been her own fault.
frylock
(34,825 posts)are you fucking shitting me?! welcome to the nu-democratik party. sieg heil.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)Response to onehandle (Original post)
Post removed
clayton72
(135 posts)Once Secret Service starts protecting someone don't they vet all people before they're allowed within range of the target they're protecting? Hasn't it been this way since JFK or Reagan were shot at? Occassionally there are larger events with a less than totally vetted audience, but that costs a lot of tax payer money and puts strain on the human reasources of the Service. Once they're in the room, they should be able to ask any question they want though without interfearance by the Service. They protect from bullets, not barbed questions.