Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,073 posts)
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:36 PM Feb 2014

Smokers could get $50 tickets for lighting up under new outdoor smoking ordinance (Ann Arbor)

Source: Ann Arbor News

At some point this year, it could become illegal in Ann Arbor to smoke at bus stops or near entrances to city buildings and the Blake Transit Center.

There's also talk of adding new prohibitions on smoking in city parks and near the entrances to businesses.

Smokers caught violating the new law could be ticketed by city police and asked to pay a $50 fine.

"I'm optimistic that it will pass," said City Council Member Chuck Warpehoski, D-5th Ward, who is proposing a new city ordinance regulating smoking in outdoor public places.

Read more: http://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/index.ssf/2014/02/smokers_could_get_50_tickets_f.html



I'll happily support any city that stops rude smokers from blowing smoke in my face, including this place I spent 4 years of my childhood in. 100 non-smokers have more rights than 1 entitled self-centered smoker. People should not have to breathe in substances that they do not consent to inhaling.
69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Smokers could get $50 tickets for lighting up under new outdoor smoking ordinance (Ann Arbor) (Original Post) alp227 Feb 2014 OP
Yep. SheilaT Feb 2014 #1
Good. It's horrible when you are enjoying a nice spring day and some jerk blows smoke at you. Nye Bevan Feb 2014 #2
Post removed Post removed Feb 2014 #3
You know, as someone who quit smoking 60 days ago, this is very hurtful. CurtEastPoint Feb 2014 #4
I'm sorry; it was parody. Hard to tell sometimes, ain't it? Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #11
Kind of scary that it wasn't recognized as satire... n/t nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #20
If I were on the jury, I woud have seen it as sarcasm. tofuandbeer Feb 2014 #27
heh... it actually can be hard to tell.. penultimate Feb 2014 #49
Arthur Dimmesdale must have been on that jury... n/t Psephos Feb 2014 #60
And a jury voted 5-1 to HIDE THAT. nt alp227 Feb 2014 #14
+1 tofuandbeer Feb 2014 #28
Yes, I DID recognize saracasm. "Jerk" "Rude" "Inconsiderate" "Asshole" CurtEastPoint Feb 2014 #41
A lot of those openly pissing and moaning about smokers getting their sedative fix with nicotine Submariner Feb 2014 #15
Do you have anything to back that claim up or are you just venting? totodeinhere Feb 2014 #16
exactly heaven05 Feb 2014 #50
Need to fine women that wear too much perfume, parents of kids that make noise in restaurants... Tx4obama Feb 2014 #5
Fallacious. Everyone sweats. None of these (except perfume maybe) can compare with tobacco. nt alp227 Feb 2014 #9
I'm not even a smoker and I *still* get fed up with the anti-tobacco folks. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #18
+1 russspeakeasy Feb 2014 #25
"...folks that talk on their cell phones in public" KansDem Feb 2014 #35
Especially the perfume. Gemini Cat Feb 2014 #37
yep - well observed n/t Psephos Feb 2014 #61
Dehumanizing anyone is unacceptable. bl968 Feb 2014 #6
because what they do HARMS OTHERS. alp227 Feb 2014 #10
Then park your damn car and ride a bike mokawanis Feb 2014 #31
Make no mistake about it though bluestateguy Feb 2014 #7
Maybe for some. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2014 #13
I don't think so. We learned as a country during the prohibition era that such restrictions totodeinhere Feb 2014 #17
Well, such a law would mean that my mother would be alive Demeter Feb 2014 #30
I Could Get $50 Worth Of Tickets For bkanderson76 Feb 2014 #8
Good. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2014 #12
Unfortunately, most people work 6-8 hours (or more) a day. Can't just sit at home and light up. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #19
If their employer provides one, great. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2014 #21
Why? quakerboy Feb 2014 #69
yeah and every time heaven05 Feb 2014 #39
That's another problem..... ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2014 #42
Just categorize all of us smokers as disabled - send a check every month and I'll stay home... Tx4obama Feb 2014 #22
Smokers just don't get it. SheilaT Feb 2014 #29
We're not expecting or looking for your approval mokawanis Feb 2014 #32
Not really my problem. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2014 #44
Nonsense mokawanis Feb 2014 #64
There are polite smokers and rude smokers. There are polite non-smokers and rude non-smokers. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #33
What would Rush Limbaugh do? (warning: graphic image!) freshwest Feb 2014 #23
Nice! a2liberal Feb 2014 #24
When I went to UC Santa Cruz, smoking was allowed except within 25 feet of windows and vent intakes. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #34
Good in Washington there is a 25 buffer zone gopiscrap Feb 2014 #26
Then get a big plastic bubble and a separate air feed... Lost_Count Feb 2014 #36
exactly justabob Feb 2014 #40
I travel by city bus christx30 Feb 2014 #55
That last lie is exactly how some smokers think.(ironically) ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2014 #45
Sorry chuckles... Lost_Count Feb 2014 #58
stupid heaven05 Feb 2014 #38
This kind of law serves no one, but will cause more grief for poor people. Don't think for a moment Todays_Illusion Feb 2014 #43
Nick Taylor is that you? ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2014 #46
I don't know who Nick Taylor is, don't care. Am I to accept that you want more people in jail? Todays_Illusion Feb 2014 #52
Yes. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2014 #53
You forgot the /s Todays_Illusion Feb 2014 #57
Very true bluestateguy Feb 2014 #54
I'm not a smoker and never have been, and I hate the smell of cigarette smoke, but iemitsu Feb 2014 #47
I quit smoking cigarettes They_Live Feb 2014 #48
ask yourself...why does mr pig care? pretzel4gore Feb 2014 #51
It's awful! I smoked for 45 years then quit 7 years ago and now when I sit on my porch Helen Highwater Feb 2014 #56
I never smoked but I have scar tissue in my lungs. Manifestor_of_Light Feb 2014 #59
Just a thought, but suiciders choose car exhaust as the deadlier fume for a reason. n/t Psephos Feb 2014 #62
That's more concentrated CO. Manifestor_of_Light Feb 2014 #63
Right, because cops don't have better things to do than waste time on this crap. PeteSelman Feb 2014 #65
Not if you have asthma, it is not dumb. Manifestor_of_Light Feb 2014 #66
Because you have asthma, we need to add a ridiculous layer of bureaucracy? PeteSelman Feb 2014 #67
I'll avoid that public area if possible. It might not be possible though. Manifestor_of_Light Feb 2014 #68
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
1. Yep.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:50 PM
Feb 2014

I do get tired of smokers justifying their smoking. What they don't get is how polite I am being when I don't make it abundantly clear that I can easily tell when they've gone outside to have a cigarette, because they reek when they come back inside. Gross. Yuck.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
2. Good. It's horrible when you are enjoying a nice spring day and some jerk blows smoke at you.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:53 PM
Feb 2014

Inconsiderate assholes. And then they throw their butt on the ground because they are too important to dispose of it properly. Jerks.

Response to alp227 (Original post)

tofuandbeer

(1,314 posts)
27. If I were on the jury, I woud have seen it as sarcasm.
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 02:51 AM
Feb 2014

I've found (from experience) you gotta comment like you're walking on eggshells.
Otherwise, this happens.

penultimate

(1,110 posts)
49. heh... it actually can be hard to tell..
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 03:50 PM
Feb 2014

The only reason why I was pretty sure your post was a parody was because I've seen your comments about smoking before... I don't smoke and I hope less people start smoking and I even support some of the smoking bans, but I swear it seems like many anti-smokers have other motives than to protect the non-smoking public health.

CurtEastPoint

(18,674 posts)
41. Yes, I DID recognize saracasm. "Jerk" "Rude" "Inconsiderate" "Asshole"
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 10:28 AM
Feb 2014
That is what hurts.

I was always told I was a polite and considerate smoker but according to these posts, no matter. I was a rude inconsiderate asshole jerk. Period.


Submariner

(12,513 posts)
15. A lot of those openly pissing and moaning about smokers getting their sedative fix with nicotine
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 12:00 AM
Feb 2014

are likely pill poppers and boozers who make themselves feel better by prejudicing smokers. So if this makes them feel better than others, so be it.

totodeinhere

(13,059 posts)
16. Do you have anything to back that claim up or are you just venting?
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 12:22 AM
Feb 2014

I know this is anecdotal, but I am strongly against any smoking in public but I am not a boozer and I do not pop pills. And I have friends in the same situation. Your comment about people like me is a cheap shot IMO.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
50. exactly
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 03:55 PM
Feb 2014

those pissing and moaning have their vices also. As far as smoking outside, so what. Get a life moaners. So they 'reek' when they come back in, none of your business oh so holier than thou!

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
5. Need to fine women that wear too much perfume, parents of kids that make noise in restaurants...
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:18 PM
Feb 2014

... sweaty men that do not wear deodorant, folks that talk on their cell phones in public, etc.

Hell, let's just fine everyone $50 that do not do exactly want you wish they would do.



Edited to add...

I wonder sometimes if folks realize how offensive anti-smoking posts and comments are to us DUers that smoke.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
18. I'm not even a smoker and I *still* get fed up with the anti-tobacco folks.
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 12:28 AM
Feb 2014

I have no real problem with restricting smoking to designated areas (outdoor or indoor) but this back-door Prohibition shit is not okay with me. Prohibition didn't work with alcohol and it won't work with nicotine either!

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
35. "...folks that talk on their cell phones in public"
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 08:01 AM
Feb 2014

I got a BIG DOSE of that last Friday.

I had the day off and went to one of my favorite restaurants for lunch. I was seated in a booth next to two diners, one who was talking on his cell phone. It wasn't so much the call itself but that this dolt was conducting business like he was at the office. His calls were long and loud, much louder than normal restaurant conversation. He rarely spoke to his lunch mate.

When I go out to eat, I don't want to hear about orders and numbers and contracts and dates of delivery, etc., and verifications of orders, numbers, contracts, and dates of delivery, etc., at three times the volume of casual conversation.

Just leave the business of business at the office and leave the rest of us to dine in peace.

Gemini Cat

(2,820 posts)
37. Especially the perfume.
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 09:34 AM
Feb 2014

I'd rather be around a dozen smokers than someone who wears perfume. Gag. It gives me a headache.

bl968

(360 posts)
6. Dehumanizing anyone is unacceptable.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:23 PM
Feb 2014

Take the word smoking in your posts and switch it out for anything else see exactly what you are doing.

Try using liberals, or blacks.

You were dehumanizing a group of people because of who they are and or what they do, and that's the first step down a slippery slope.

Just because you don't smoke, doesn't mean that other people should be forced not to, just to make your world more to your liking.

alp227

(32,073 posts)
10. because what they do HARMS OTHERS.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:45 PM
Feb 2014

I don't harm others by being a liberal...OK maybe except for shuddering freepers.

But smokers harm other people's respiratory health besides their own.

Sheesh. Smoking threads bring out so many fucking annoying fallacies.

mokawanis

(4,455 posts)
31. Then park your damn car and ride a bike
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 04:45 AM
Feb 2014

I'm tired of smelling your car exhaust and it's bad for my health, so knock it off and quit driving.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
7. Make no mistake about it though
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:38 PM
Feb 2014

The goal of these people is to eventually outlaw smoking in the privacy of your own home, all smoking.

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,869 posts)
13. Maybe for some.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:51 PM
Feb 2014

Personally I don't give a shit. Shoot heroin into your eyeballs for all I care. I just don't want to look at your litter and smell your smoke.

totodeinhere

(13,059 posts)
17. I don't think so. We learned as a country during the prohibition era that such restrictions
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 12:26 AM
Feb 2014

do not work. Yes in that case it was alcohol that they tried to prohibit but the same dynamic would apply if we tried to ban tobacco outright. But banning smoking in enclosed vehicles with children present is a different matter. No adult should have the right to pollute the lungs of innocent children.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
30. Well, such a law would mean that my mother would be alive
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 04:21 AM
Feb 2014

and most of my family of that generation....

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,869 posts)
12. Good.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:49 PM
Feb 2014

Smoke in your own private space.



And throwing cigarette butts on the ground should be an automatic 500 dollar fine.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
19. Unfortunately, most people work 6-8 hours (or more) a day. Can't just sit at home and light up.
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 12:32 AM
Feb 2014

I don't really care about smoking (or smokers) one way or the other, but as a matter of pure practicality, there has to be some designated smoking area closer to one's workplace. Like it or not...

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,869 posts)
21. If their employer provides one, great.
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 12:39 AM
Feb 2014

If not, though luck. If you make the choice to be a smoker that's on you. Smokers are not a protected class.

quakerboy

(13,923 posts)
69. Why?
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 11:33 PM
Feb 2014

My employer isn't likely to provide me a designated drinking area if I happen to be a habitual user of alcohol, or a designated masturbation area if I happen to have a porn habit.

Why should a company be expected to provide smokers extra rights and privileges?

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
39. yeah and every time
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 10:03 AM
Feb 2014

a person starts their car, maybe a 1000 dollar fine? Doing more damage to us and our planet than a cigarette.

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,869 posts)
42. That's another problem.....
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 01:12 PM
Feb 2014

And it's also being addressed via legislation.

I guess we shouldn't worry about any problem if there is another problem that is worse. What a great way to run things.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
22. Just categorize all of us smokers as disabled - send a check every month and I'll stay home...
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 12:47 AM
Feb 2014

Non-smokers have already made it to where going to bars and restaurants suck due to all the no smoking ordinances.

I think it is not the smokers that are rude - in my opinion the rude folks are the one that keep bashing us smokers.

How about the non-smokers stay holed up in the homes for awhile and see how it feels.

p.s. I think in some cases it is all in the mind of the non-smokers. A couple of years ago I was standing outside of a restaurant talking with some non-smokers and two women walked by and started waving their hands and coughing as they walked past me. I was holding a cigarette that was NOT lit - no one was even smoking!

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
29. Smokers just don't get it.
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 02:56 AM
Feb 2014

You think you are being considerate because you go outside to smoke. You honestly have no idea how much you reek when you come back inside. Trust me, I'm the considerate one when I don't overtly react to how awful you smell.

I also want to ask, how old are you? When did you take up smoking? If it was after 1964, you simply get no sympathy from me. And it's not as though it wasn't widely understood even before the Surgeon General's report fifty years ago that smoking was deadly. If you chose to take up smoking after that date, understand that you are on your own. You have voluntarily taken up and addictive and deadly habit. Please to not ask me to feel sorry for you. You can't smoke in restaurants? Or grocery stores? Or hospitals? Gosh. How unfortunate. Smoke all you want. Just not where you can stink up the rest of the world.

mokawanis

(4,455 posts)
32. We're not expecting or looking for your approval
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 04:50 AM
Feb 2014

We aren't asking to smoke in grocery stores and hospitals, but we do demand the right to smoke outdoors. If that offends you, that's your problem..

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,869 posts)
44. Not really my problem.
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 01:14 PM
Feb 2014

You think you have the right, but you're wrong. You're not a protected class and laws like this are catching on. I didn't make the choice to smoke so it's really your problem, not mine.

mokawanis

(4,455 posts)
64. Nonsense
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 07:53 PM
Feb 2014

If you are offended by people smoking outdoors, that's your problem. Whine all you want, but it's perfectly legal for me to walk down the sidewalk and have a smoke. I do it every day, and people like you can do nothing to prevent it. The laws that are being passed here and there are banning smoking in specific areas, so if you're suggesting that the day is coming when they'll be some sort of outright ban of smoking everywhere in public areas you couldn't be more wrong. It ain't gonna happen.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
33. There are polite smokers and rude smokers. There are polite non-smokers and rude non-smokers.
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 04:51 AM
Feb 2014

The habit or lack thereof, in and of itself, doesn't necessarily indicate good (or bad) manners.

a2liberal

(1,524 posts)
24. Nice!
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 01:07 AM
Feb 2014

hopefully they will actually enforce it... (there's still smoking on U of M campus where it's theoretically banned)

though technically it's against county ordinance to smoke near entrances anyway... (maybe that doesn't apply to city buldings?)

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
34. When I went to UC Santa Cruz, smoking was allowed except within 25 feet of windows and vent intakes.
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 04:56 AM
Feb 2014

Good thing for the smokers, because considering how isolated the campus is, not being able to light up anywhere would be a giant pain in the ass. I never took up the habit myself - I smoked pot (and still do) instead - but I have noticed that cigarette smoking has (unfortunately) made a comeback among my generation (I'm 29, graduated college in 2007).

gopiscrap

(23,766 posts)
26. Good in Washington there is a 25 buffer zone
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 01:15 AM
Feb 2014

between your smoking and any public building...some towns here have 250.00 fines

 

Lost_Count

(555 posts)
36. Then get a big plastic bubble and a separate air feed...
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 08:42 AM
Feb 2014

... because right now,at this very moment, you are breathing in substances you didn't agree to.

Way to demand that the universe revolve around you.

justabob

(3,069 posts)
40. exactly
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 10:19 AM
Feb 2014

That argument has always been silly. I mean really, banning cigarettes at a bus stop where people are standing where dozens to hundreds of cars, trucks and buses pass billowing god knows what chemicals in their exhaust?! Give me an effing break. There is all kinds of dangerous shit I didn't consent to breathe wafting around in the air of my city and region.... Dangerous shit that does far more harm to far more people and wildlife/ecology than cigarettes ever will. I don't mean to be advocating for smokers, but really, that argument is ridiculous. I get it that smokers are easy pickin's when compared to big polluting industry and car culture and people can feel like they are "winning" and be righteous and all the rest of it by passing these ordinances, but it can't really reduce the toxins in the air all that much.... speaking of outside now, not indoor smoking bans....

christx30

(6,241 posts)
55. I travel by city bus
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 05:52 PM
Feb 2014

every day and I hate having to stand there with smokers at the stop. There are no smoking signs all over the place (no smoking within 15 feet of the stop), but people violate that all the time. I'd like to see drivers refuse to allow smokers to board if they are seen smoking at the stop. That would get them to quit it quick, if they have to stand there in the cold for another hour.

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,869 posts)
45. That last lie is exactly how some smokers think.(ironically)
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 01:18 PM
Feb 2014

Maybe I'm addicted to fresh air? Hahahaha.



By the way the "you're already breathing bad stuff" argument doesn't fly.



"You're already breathing in pollutants so I should have the right to blow more pollutants in your face"


I love reading these selfish posts from smokers. Enjoy being legislated back in to your own home.

 

Lost_Count

(555 posts)
58. Sorry chuckles...
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 06:27 PM
Feb 2014

Non-smoker here...

It seems to boggle your mind that someone could advocate for choice even if they personally wouldn't do it.

Classic behavior controlist...

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
38. stupid
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 09:59 AM
Feb 2014

and another small step toward being arrested for breathing. Dumb, idiotic, draconian. And I'm an ex smoker.

Todays_Illusion

(1,209 posts)
43. This kind of law serves no one, but will cause more grief for poor people. Don't think for a moment
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 01:13 PM
Feb 2014

this is just one more way to lock up poor people, unable to pay the fine, there will be no benefit for it.


As for the great no smoking campaign, there has been no improvement in health, ciggies were traded for snacks and now instead of lung cancer/heart disease, we have diabetes/heart disease.

Whoppee!

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
54. Very true
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 04:57 PM
Feb 2014

A bunch of well-to do politicians, egged on by upper middle class academics, doctors and interest groups activists (the "food police&quot pass laws that will as a practical effect, make life difficult for poor people.

How about instead, investing in public smoking cessation programs that poor folks can use. Otherwise smoking cessation programs can be prohibitively expensive.

iemitsu

(3,888 posts)
47. I'm not a smoker and never have been, and I hate the smell of cigarette smoke, but
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 02:59 PM
Feb 2014

we have to breathe the pollutant filled air, that industry and automobile users concoct for us, without draconian laws curtailing their "right" to dump poisons into our air/environment.
While I have no real problem with laws prohibiting public smoking, it seems unfair to demonize and punish the small polluters and let the giant ones off scot-free.

They_Live

(3,242 posts)
48. I quit smoking cigarettes
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 03:41 PM
Feb 2014

a little over a year ago, after smoking for more than 30 years. I feel a lot better now. I highly recommend quitting if you do smoke. I do use the e-cig occasionally, but that's about it in the nicotine department. I quit because now that we have a child, I was always hiding outside to smoke. Couldn't smoke in the house, or in my car, or in any building in town (including most bars now). I am saving at least $200 a month. I never thought I could do it, but I did, and you can too.

 

pretzel4gore

(8,146 posts)
51. ask yourself...why does mr pig care?
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 04:26 PM
Feb 2014

watching the great beast unfolding, 24/7 since 1980 openly and previous to that sorta on the quiet, i realize the bastards try using our best instincts against us. Remember the blue dress, and how all those nice decent liberal left types were forced to DEFEND a character who became a punch line for rightwing jokers? Or OJ Simpson? Fact is, I will bet anyone the entire anti smoking campaign is mostly concerned with the recent easing of marijuana laws- the idea being to help offset the efforts to re-examine the 'war on drugs'and society recognizing that pot isn't evil, never was, and its criminalization was motivated by assholes who dare not publicly admit their REAL agenda (to keep control of society, by turning the publicly funded drug cops into the enforcement arm of the drug lords of wall street and their goddam minions waging war on the poor/powerless!) The American taxpayer pumps $85 billion a month into the stock market, w/out any serious debate about it in mass media, and has been doing so for years, so i think a relatively few people's 'bad' habits are the least of the country's problems. BTW, go ahead and make smoking impossible, using extant laws and building codes etc, but DO NOT EMPOWER MR PIG doing so! HE hates us....
He will kill US, eventually

 

Helen Highwater

(30 posts)
56. It's awful! I smoked for 45 years then quit 7 years ago and now when I sit on my porch
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 05:53 PM
Feb 2014

enjoying a nice evening (well not right now, it's snowing) watching the birds and clouds, some inconsiderate idiot who lives around here decides to drive his stinking polluting car that spews out as much CO, CO2 and H2S as much as ten thousand cigarettes right past my house and stinks up the whole block. It really is frustrating.

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
59. I never smoked but I have scar tissue in my lungs.
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 06:31 PM
Feb 2014

It's visible on X-ray, it looks like little white and black dots lining my tubules.

My parents smoked when I was a kid. Dad stopped when I was about five. Mom smoked unfiltered Marlboros until I was ten years old. The damage is done.

I have allergic asthma and get sick around smokers. I have cut off friendships with smokers because I got sick with bronchitis 2 days after exposure.

I wish smokers would be more considerate and use gum or a patch, so they wouldn't make the rest of us choke, and they wouldn't smell so horrible. In stores, I can smell a smoker if they are about four feet away. They smell bad because it's in their entire system.

Car exhaust is a false equivalency. I do not think I have ever gotten sick and had to go to a doctor after exposure to car exhaust.

PeteSelman

(1,508 posts)
67. Because you have asthma, we need to add a ridiculous layer of bureaucracy?
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 09:44 PM
Feb 2014

Adding extra confrontations with police that are totally unnecessary? For someone that is smoking outside in a public area?

I do think it's ridiculous indeed.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Smokers could get $50 tic...