Russians Protest Disallowed Hockey Goal at U.S. Embassy in Moscow
Source: New York Times
It was the biggest demonstration so far concerning the Sochi Olympics, and it had nothing to do with gay rights, environmental damage or corruption.
Dozens of Russian fans gathered Monday outside the United States embassy in Moscow, some brandishing hockey sticks, to protest a disallowed goal scored by the Russian team in Saturdays Olympic hockey match against the United States in Sochi, a decision that they felt cost them the game against their Cold War rivals.
A crowd of mainly students erected a large banner in front of the embassy reading, Turn the referee into soap!, a common Russian chant at sporting events, implying the referee is fit only to have his bones and body fat boiled down for soap.
....
Many Russians, including the teams coach, Zinetula Bilyaletdinov, accused Meier afterward of making a mistake in disqualifying the shot from Fedor Tyutin, although the International Ice Hockey Federation has backed the referees decision.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/18/sports/olympics/russians-protest-disallowed-hockey-goal-at-us-embassy-in-moscow.html?_r=0
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 17, 2014, 03:07 PM - Edit history (1)
I understand their consternation, but I watched the game and the net was dislodged albeit slightly. Rules are rules.
Besides - Kovalchuk had several opportunities to win the game in the shootout but Quick shut him down.
It was a really exciting, intense game; much like Stanley Cup playoff hockey even though it didn't count towards a medal. The real blow to the Russian team was their failure to win against Slovakia during regulation. That forced them to play in the elimination round.
msongs
(67,473 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 17, 2014, 04:44 PM - Edit history (1)
Jesus Christ...Talk about glass houses...
To this very day those Silver medals from 1972 lie unclaimed in a Munich bank vault...
BeyondGeography
(39,392 posts)Weak call, though. The NHL probably wouldn't even have reviewed it.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)sked14
(579 posts)different rules for international hockey.
BeyondGeography
(39,392 posts)They had just tied it up and they were totally dominating play. We were on our heels and it looked and felt like a goal. We won, but it was on a technicality so obscure our own players didn't even know why the goal was disallowed:
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=705138
If you read the article, it's quite possible that Quick himself dislodged the net, as he has been known to do in the past. Maybe he felt a bad moon rising (because it was) and pulled a fast one.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)There are several other differences.
The international rink is wider, Goalies can play the puck anywhere behind the next, and a two line pass is legal.
didn't mean it as a slap towards you.
Ishoutandscream2
(6,664 posts)I remember watching that game in 1972 in total disbelief. My God!
groundloop
(11,530 posts)From another article: http://www.csnwashington.com/hockey-washington-capitals/talk/did-quick-intentionally-dislodge-his-net
I play with him, Voynov told reporters after the game. I know that's his style.
I watched that game, and I too had the feeling that the US team was being outplayed. I also noticed in the replay that Quick was very fast to point to the dislodged mooring after the goal. As little as it moved I think it's a little fishy that he was even aware of it without having taken an active role in it's being moved. I expect this particular rule to be heavily debated in the rules committee during the next 4 years, this is exactly why the rule was changed in the NHL.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)RUles are rules but jeez.
marble falls
(57,414 posts)tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)oopsies, Putin-Approved!
Arkana
(24,347 posts)You lost, get over it.
chrisa
(4,524 posts)I swear some people care more about stupid ball games than human life.