Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 12:29 AM Feb 2014

Biden Calls New Ukraine Leader, Pledges Support

Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Vice President Joe Biden has told Ukraine's new prime minister that the U.S. welcomes the formation of the country's new government.

The White House says Biden called Arseniy Yatsenyuk (ahr-SEHN'-ee yaht-sehn-YOOK') Thursday.

It's an important signal of U.S. recognition for Yatsenyuk as the de facto leader of the former Soviet republic.

Biden told Yatsenyuk the U.S. will give full support as Ukraine seeks to restore order in the wake of a major political crisis.

Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_BIDEN_UKRAINE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-02-27-22-51-41



Hmmm...sounds like 'game-on', eh Pooty-Poot?

60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Biden Calls New Ukraine Leader, Pledges Support (Original Post) Purveyor Feb 2014 OP
Don't forget former Soviet Georgia. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2014 #1
Oh great! another_liberal Feb 2014 #3
"Who are you people!" I am one who remembers and does not forget. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2014 #5
Be that as it may, my friend . . . another_liberal Feb 2014 #8
My original point was that the order for extermination of Alexander Litvinenko R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2014 #11
Sure. another_liberal Feb 2014 #15
I'm not sure that you understand anything about the Ukrainian situation. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2014 #17
Then you are wrong. another_liberal Feb 2014 #21
Please. Edjumacate me. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2014 #24
I'll tell you what . . . another_liberal Feb 2014 #43
I'm an American so I don't know who your "we" is, but we're not trying to push our weight around, okaawhatever Feb 2014 #38
If a fraction of what has happened in Ukraine . . . another_liberal Feb 2014 #40
I second this (okaawhatever). n/t levp Feb 2014 #47
Litvinenko was spying for the UK dipsydoodle Feb 2014 #48
He asked for asylum there levp Feb 2014 #52
Easy subject to search - try Google dipsydoodle Feb 2014 #53
Daily Mail? levp Feb 2014 #55
The US, at the highest levels, is trying to dial this back karynnj Feb 2014 #46
It's not the US that would do (or even particularly want) that Recursion Feb 2014 #7
Perhaps, but the important point is . . . another_liberal Feb 2014 #12
Thanks for being able to see my point. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2014 #13
Georgia started that issue : not Russia. dipsydoodle Feb 2014 #49
This message was self-deleted by its author another_liberal Feb 2014 #2
But what about the fascists? starroute Feb 2014 #4
Great. Sounds like our own government in the USA. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2014 #6
There are some in every country levp Feb 2014 #50
Don't understand the hubris regarding Putin 1000words Feb 2014 #9
He holds all the cards cosmicone Feb 2014 #22
Bad move in the wrong neighborhood cosmicone Feb 2014 #10
Seeing how Russia is supporting Syria I see no reason why Nato should not support the Ukraine. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2014 #14
It's called having the will to make the sacrifices necessary to back up your big talk. another_liberal Feb 2014 #18
Well, I guess that everybody understands your vote for capitulation to Russia. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2014 #20
Go ahead then, hotdog . . . another_liberal Feb 2014 #25
Nobody mentioned a shooting war...except for yourself. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2014 #27
What do you think you're playing at then? another_liberal Feb 2014 #44
So Russia deploys troops and fighter jets to the border penultimate Feb 2014 #28
Well yes, Russia has a god given right to former occupied Soviet territories. joshcryer Feb 2014 #31
It's got a pretty reasonable historical claim to Crimea, although the Tatars might disagree. Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #35
No doubt with support from other Sunni's... joshcryer Feb 2014 #36
Crimea was heavily Russified, like many other places in the former Russian Empire and USSR. Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2014 #59
Won't happen cosmicone Feb 2014 #19
I guess that my original point was lost, and I should have made it more clear. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2014 #23
There will be no NATO troops in Ukraine - period. n/t cosmicone Feb 2014 #30
Then there will be Russian troops. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2014 #34
They have a right to support their ethnic population cosmicone Feb 2014 #37
We'll remember this when US starts it's next war levp Feb 2014 #54
We have already done that before. cosmicone Feb 2014 #58
Exactly my point levp Feb 2014 #60
This is precisely why Georgia and Ukraine are petitioning to be in NATO. joshcryer Feb 2014 #29
NATO doesn't want a conflict with Russia cosmicone Feb 2014 #32
This is why they will be perpetual "Intensified Dialogue" states. joshcryer Feb 2014 #33
The US, UK and Russia signed a treaty when Ukraine got rid of her nukes that we would okaawhatever Feb 2014 #39
Then why have we gone out of our way to meddle . . . another_liberal Feb 2014 #42
She just happened to want levp Feb 2014 #56
"we got what we wanted--no harm, no foul, eh?" MisterP Feb 2014 #16
foolish DonCoquixote Feb 2014 #26
“He’s the type of guy who can hobnob with the European elite. A Mario Monti type: unelected and jakeXT Feb 2014 #41
Once austerity measures and new debt kicks in cosmicone Feb 2014 #45
Mother of all Greeces dipsydoodle Feb 2014 #51
That is a VERY important signal to everyone involved. Will keep local people safer in the long run. Sunlei Feb 2014 #57
 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
1. Don't forget former Soviet Georgia.
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:02 AM
Feb 2014

The Russians just took what they wanted.

I turned to my wife a few nights ago and said, "Do you believe that someplace, somewhere there is a dose of Polonium with Putin's name on it?"

"I wouldn't bet against it", she said.

I wonder if somebody would try and take Putin out, but who would replace him?


If Russia wants to take something on it's borders then it will. Same old same old, and really no different than the USA if you look at it at face value.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
3. Oh great!
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:06 AM
Feb 2014

Now we want to suggest the assassination of the leader of a major World power? Who are you people!

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
5. "Who are you people!" I am one who remembers and does not forget.
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:12 AM
Feb 2014

How about yooz?

The Russians, excuse me former Soviets, are really good with poison and delivery systems.

My only thought as that what goes around comes around.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Alexander_Litvinenko

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
8. Be that as it may, my friend . . .
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:16 AM
Feb 2014

It is now time to be pragmatic, not carelessly quixotic. We are just about to get ourselves in a real mess. American lives could be at stake before much longer if someone doesn't try to dial this thing back.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
11. My original point was that the order for extermination of Alexander Litvinenko
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:25 AM
Feb 2014

most likely originated from the Kremlin.

Seeing how that isn't really a stretch my question to my wife revolved around 'if Putin can reach others, the somebody in the know might reach him as well'...sort of a MacBethian character or certainly Richard the III.

Pragmatic has nothing to do with it. I was not advocating for the US assassination of Putin. Also, Russia can't keep this mess in a bottle.

It's puppet is now in Russia. It's puppet has been indicted on the deaths of many innocent Ukrainians.

It's puppet tried to destroy records but did a horrible job; only incriminating it further.


Fuck Russia.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
15. Sure.
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:29 AM
Feb 2014

Tell that to the men and women who will be getting on the transport planes and flying to Kiev if we don't stop trying to push our goddamned weight around like we own the whole fucking World.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
17. I'm not sure that you understand anything about the Ukrainian situation.
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:36 AM
Feb 2014

Russia's puppet has been in power there for a while, and the people revolted.

A real liberal would understand what has just taken place.
 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
21. Then you are wrong.
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:39 AM
Feb 2014

I suspect you are the one who is actually frighteningly naive about what is happening.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
43. I'll tell you what . . .
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 06:43 AM
Feb 2014

Get together ten or eleven other people who are willing to read a few books and meet twice a week for a couple hours during the next three months or so, and I'll be glad to (we can talk about what you'll each pay me). I'll make it very informative, and I am qualified.

okaawhatever

(9,478 posts)
38. I'm an American so I don't know who your "we" is, but we're not trying to push our weight around,
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 04:21 AM
Feb 2014

no matter what Putin's propaganda machine tells you. It was Putin who chose to call a military spot drill of 150k troops, it was Putin who decided to deploy his air force for patrols over the area, it was Putin who sent his sailors into the Airport to detain? kidnap? the current President. WE aren't escalating this. Putin is. There is a treaty in place with the US, UK and Russia that says we will respect Ukraine's borders and sovereignty. Is the US interfering with that? Didn't think so. We've called for things to calm down. Your language is about as appropriate as your opinion on the subject.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
40. If a fraction of what has happened in Ukraine . . .
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 06:23 AM
Feb 2014

Were to happen in Canada or Mexico, we would have military all over the damn border. Hell, we'd have invaded weeks ago!

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
53. Easy subject to search - try Google
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 10:32 AM
Feb 2014

Sample here : Revealed: Poisoned ex-Russian spy Litvinenko WAS a paid-up MI6 agent

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-490007/Revealed-Poisoned-ex-Russian-spy-Litvinenko-WAS-paid-MI6-agent.html#ixzz2ucxFmJiR

and here Exclusive: Murdered spy Alexander Litvinenko gave MI6 secret briefings about key ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/exclusive-murdered-spy-alexander-litvinenko-gave-mi6-secret-briefings-about-key-ally-of-russian-president-vladimir-putin-8970939.html

What we get in our own UK media may differ from drivel you get elsewhere.

levp

(188 posts)
55. Daily Mail?
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 10:38 AM
Feb 2014

Hm.
In any event, he was receiving money as a consultant way after he received that asylum. In other words, he got a regular a job - he never went back to Russia (obviously) or any other country to spy on. Pretty lousy spy.

karynnj

(59,510 posts)
46. The US, at the highest levels, is trying to dial this back
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 10:22 AM
Feb 2014

By highest levels - look at the statements of VP Biden and SoS John Kerry. (I haven't read an Obama comment, but I am sure he is in the same place. )

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
7. It's not the US that would do (or even particularly want) that
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:14 AM
Feb 2014

That would be other actors in Russia and surrounding countries.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
12. Perhaps, but the important point is . . .
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:25 AM
Feb 2014

Russia's leadership is not likely to see it that way at all. Consult a map and I think you'll quickly see why that matters.

This is no time to be writing checks with our mouths which we will not want to lose the treasure and the blood to cash.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
49. Georgia started that issue : not Russia.
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 10:26 AM
Feb 2014

Georgia had also had advice and training from the the US and Israel prior to that event - massive fail..

Response to Purveyor (Original post)

starroute

(12,977 posts)
4. But what about the fascists?
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:11 AM
Feb 2014
http://www.dreamdeferred.org.uk/2014/02/fascists-take-deputy-prime-minister-and-other-posts-in-ukraines-new-government/

Fascists are now part of Ukraine’s government. Oleksandr Sych, of the fascist Svoboda party, has been appointed as deputy prime minister of Ukraine.

He will take the post under prime minister Arseniy Yatseniuk of the neo-liberal, conservative Batkivshchyna (“Fatherland”) party.

Sych is one of Svoboda’s 36 MPs and has made a particular name for himself with an attempt to ban all abortions.

Svoboda also has Andriy Mokhnyk as ecology minister and Ihor Shvaik as agriculture minister in the new administration.

levp

(188 posts)
50. There are some in every country
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 10:27 AM
Feb 2014

Tea Party, anyone?
UKIP?
Same in France, Belgium, etc.

So should we stop supporting the people of USA, UK, France?

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
22. He holds all the cards
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:39 AM
Feb 2014

the Ukrainian protesters have none. They just think the US and EU will come to their rescue like the Georgians thought. Bad mistake.

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
10. Bad move in the wrong neighborhood
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:19 AM
Feb 2014

This will not end well for the Western Ukrainians and the US is powerless to do anything. Under NATO doctrine, US cannot act a war on its own in Europe and no European country wants a war with Russia.

It would have been better for the Ukrainians to see this evolve slowly but they were too impatient to be part of EU. EU doesn't have the funds to support its existing basket case members like Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland and they won't be able to help Ukraine.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
14. Seeing how Russia is supporting Syria I see no reason why Nato should not support the Ukraine.
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:28 AM
Feb 2014

Send some tanks and troops in and fortify the eastern border for goodness sake.

Fuck Russia.
 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
18. It's called having the will to make the sacrifices necessary to back up your big talk.
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:36 AM
Feb 2014

This is not going to be an Iraq or an Afghanistan. The Russians will fight when cornered, and they will fight hard. If we don't cool our nonsense down quick, the bloody nose we get might never heal.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
25. Go ahead then, hotdog . . .
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:43 AM
Feb 2014

Start a shooting war with Russian on her own Western border. But be advised, there are already huge graveyards (really huge ones) full of people who did the same.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
44. What do you think you're playing at then?
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 07:52 AM
Feb 2014

This is the way wars get started, my friend, an they are a great deal easier to start than to stop once started

penultimate

(1,110 posts)
28. So Russia deploys troops and fighter jets to the border
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:49 AM
Feb 2014

and that means it would be the US/NATO/Whatever who starts a war?

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,227 posts)
59. Crimea was heavily Russified, like many other places in the former Russian Empire and USSR.
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 10:52 AM
Feb 2014

Ideally, Crimea would be its own independent nation. But Russia (in both the Empire and Soviet forms) made sure to dig its claws in pretty deeply to its soil due to its strategic location.

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
19. Won't happen
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:37 AM
Feb 2014

Any resulting war will be fought on European soil. The French and Germans will particularly be against escalation and they will have to primarily foot the bill. Only UK being the poodle it is will support a war but that won't be enough.

When Georgia had a conflict, only John McCain made any noise and everyone else just shut up.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
23. I guess that my original point was lost, and I should have made it more clear.
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:42 AM
Feb 2014

Back in the day during the Cold War, the Russians would seize any opportunity to advance their territory. That would include, for example, a planned socialist coup in a foreign country then a call for aid; which the Soviets would gladly come to the rescue with.

All I was suggesting is something similar, but with the invitation from Ukraine. The Russians will take what they want, but perhaps they would think twice if they had to fire on Nato Peace keeping troops.
 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
37. They have a right to support their ethnic population
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 03:42 AM
Feb 2014

and their military assets which are already there.

joshcryer

(62,287 posts)
29. This is precisely why Georgia and Ukraine are petitioning to be in NATO.
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:54 AM
Feb 2014

Russia has too much influence for their liking and they know they'd be protected from Russia if they were in NATO. Russia needs them as a modern "Iron Curtain."

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
32. NATO doesn't want a conflict with Russia
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:56 AM
Feb 2014

those countries may become part of EU but will not be allowed in NATO because it would be a recipe for disaster.

okaawhatever

(9,478 posts)
39. The US, UK and Russia signed a treaty when Ukraine got rid of her nukes that we would
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 05:04 AM
Feb 2014

respect their borders and sovereignty. If Russia makes a move on Crimea, they're in violation of that. Also, the EU does have a dog in this fight. Russia pumps most of the gas it sells to the EU through Ukraine. When they "negotiate" with Ukraine over prices, they usually will cut it off in the dead of winter. At least once this has caused shortages in the EU. Ukraine can stand on it's own given time and modernization of it's resources. They have amazing farm land, a couple of oil companies had signed agreements to test for oil and gas (that was a big issue with Putin), it would have made Ukraine close to self-sufficient energy wise and an equal with Russia.
Russia desperately needs the warm water port at Sevestopol. His end game is to keep that port and try to keep Ukraine dependent on Russia's gas.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
42. Then why have we gone out of our way to meddle . . .
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 06:36 AM
Feb 2014

If a treaty to respect Ukraine's sovereignty was signed by us, then why have gone out of our way to meddle in Ukraine's internal affairs?

http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2014/feb/07/eu-us-diplomat-victoria-nuland-phonecall-leaked-video

She got the guy she wanted as Ukraine's so-called "Interim President" too, or hadn't you noticed?

levp

(188 posts)
56. She just happened to want
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 10:43 AM
Feb 2014

the same thing a whole lot of Ukrainian people wanted (for example, look up the vote to impeach Yanukovich - no votes "against" at all, even from the East).

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
26. foolish
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:47 AM
Feb 2014

at the very best case, we will be helping the EU expand, which frankly, it doe snot need help doing.

AT worst, we will ignite a powderkeg.

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
45. Once austerity measures and new debt kicks in
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 09:06 AM
Feb 2014

this guy will be far more unpopular than Yanukovytch but it will be too late by then for most Ukrainians.

Ukraine will be the mother of all Greeces.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
57. That is a VERY important signal to everyone involved. Will keep local people safer in the long run.
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 10:44 AM
Feb 2014
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Biden Calls New Ukraine L...