Tesla Model S: The Future Is Here
The all-electric Tesla Model S sedan is brilliant, beautiful, as user-friendly as a smartphone, fast as hell, quieter than C-Span, American made and years ahead of its luxury-sedan competition. But it isnt perfect. I see things I would change. Those jazzy polished-zinc door handles, for example, part of the cabins circumnavigating bands of alloy and leather, werent shaped for human hands. The 17-inch capacitive touch screen panel that dominates the forward cabin still seems clumsily placeddesign by procurement. I expect Teslas next-generation touch screen and graphical user interfaces to be fused across the forward cabin bulkhead like a bandits mask.
Nor would I be a class traitor if I could get something more intimate from Teslas color and trim department. I suppose it would be un-Buddhist to wish for diamond-pleat suede? These 12-way power adjustable seats are upholstered like high-tech dentists chairs.
Sometimes I miss the intimacy of a conventional, wraparound cockpit with a cabin-dividing center console. I long for it like a missing limb. The Model S doesnt require driveline tunnels, prop shafts or torque tubes. Not even the new all-wheel-drive models, because there are two traction motors, one fore and one aft. The floor pan is as flat as a sheet of plywood and about the same size.
Heres another problem: You can forget which of the enormous storage compartments youve put your groceries in: the front, where there is no occupying combustion motor; or the rear, where there is no evidence of a battery pack. I propose programming the daytime running lights to indicate with a single flash, forward or rear, to remind owners which end was opened last. Make it part of the proximity-approach routine. About 200 milliseconds ought to do.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/tesla-model-s-the-future-is-here-1428086202
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)not a judgment
NBachers
(17,149 posts)jmowreader
(50,567 posts)If you don't know exactly what this car is, it looks like any $25,000 midsize sedan out there.
And no, "the future" isn't a car that makes you plan trips like an 84-year-old man with a bladder problem. It is a car that uses Army tank-like Power Pack technology. I must explain: There are quite a few maintenance tasks on a tank you can't do with the engine still in the vehicle, like an oil change. This is why the Lima Tank Plant invented a way for anyone with just a little training to pull the engine out of a tank. (It's also why the Army invented oil analysis, but that's another story.)
The thing is, electric cars are great but there are situations where gasoline or diesel is better, like if you regularly need to go somewhere there won't ever be charging stations. To solve that, how about either selling or renting diesel generators that will tuck into the front trunk, and can be removed when you don't need them?
Zorro
(15,751 posts)Teslas can be plugged in to those.
One of the key strategic moves made by Musk is to build cross-country superchargers to let the cars charge on long-distance trips.
And they're free to use by Tesla drivers.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)This company is developing its own group of adoring brand acolytes, and some of them work for the WSJ. It's the world's most expensive cell phone on wheels, not the Starship Enterprise, fer chrize sakes.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)And not as cool looking as i would like, but it has been rated the top car by Consumer Reports two years running. That said, my Leaf is fun to drive and bought used, cost a fraction of the Tesla.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)A friend has one, and it's a great car. But then he lives where charging is cleaner than in places that use nonrenewable power sources.
It weighs almost as much as my F350 four wheel drive, four door, dually pickup. Just horrible.
The bottom line is, it can't be driven except in a fairly small radius. He won't visit me because I'm too close to the range limit.
We're a long way away yet.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)The Tesla needs to shed at least a ton.
jmowreader
(50,567 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)The gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR), or gross vehicle mass (GVM) is the maximum operating weight/mass of a vehicle as specified by the manufacturer including the vehicle's chassis, body, engine, engine fluids, fuel, accessories, driver, passengers and cargo but excluding that of any trailers.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_vehicle_weight_rating
Curb weight of Ford F 350 super cab is approx 7000lbs, Tesla 4600 lbs
http://my.teslamotors.com/fr_CA/forum/forums/how-much-will-40-kwh-model-s-weigh
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_vehicle_weight_rating
......
I mean, really, just look at them side by side! The point is the Tesla is much lighter and not a whale.
jmowreader
(50,567 posts)"It's not a whale! It only weighs as much as a Ford F-150!"
Okay, look at a Tesla next to a Volkswagen CC - a car similar in size. The VW weighs 3,369 lbs; Tesla's weighs 4,647.
It's a whale.
Zorro
(15,751 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)A heavier car with a low center of gravity will handle better. Weight is only bad in that it uses more energy, which is why gas cars keep getting lighter. Presumably there is some efficiency curve for battery weight vs. charge capacity, but from what I hear the Tesla's weight is s feature not a bug, and that it handles like a dream. Two electric motors with instant full torque push all that weight to 60 mph faster than any production gas car short of 1000hp.
I want one.