Free Speech, Facebook and the NSA: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
By John W. Whitehead
A person under surveillance is no longer free; a society under surveillance is no longer a democracy.Writers Against Mass Surveillance
June 06, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - THE GOOD NEWS: Americans have a right to freely express themselves on the Internet, including making threateningeven violentstatements on Facebook, provided that they dont intend to actually inflict harm.
The Supreme Courts ruling in Elonis v. United States threw out the conviction of a Pennsylvania man who was charged with making unlawful threats (it was never proven that he intended to threaten anyone) and sentenced to 44 months in jail after he posted allusions to popular rap lyrics and comedy routines on his Facebook page. Its a ruling that has First Amendment implications for where the government can draw the line when it comes to provocative and controversial speech that is protected and permissible versus speech that could be interpreted as connoting a criminal intent.
That same day, Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act, the legal justification allowing the National Security Agency (NSA) to carry out warrantless surveillance on Americans, officially expired. Over the course of nearly a decade, if not more, the NSA had covertly spied on millions of Americans, many of whom were guilty of nothing more than using a telephone, and stored their records in government databases. For those who have been fighting the uphill battle against the NSAs domestic spying program, it was a small but symbolic victory.
THE BAD NEWS: Congress legislative fix, intended to mollify critics of the NSA, will ensure that the agency is not in any way hindered in its ability to keep spying on Americans communications.
The USA FREEDOM Act could do more damage than good by creating a false impression that Congress has taken steps to prevent the government from spying on the telephone calls of citizens, while in fact ensuring the NSAs ability to continue invading the privacy and security of Americans.
For instance, the USA FREEDOM Act not only reauthorizes Section 215 of the Patriot Act for a period of time, but it also delegates to telecommunications companies the responsibility of carrying out phone surveillance on American citizens.
AND NOW FOR THE DOWNRIGHT UGLY NEWS: Nothing is going to change.
As journalist Conor Friedersdorf warns, Americans concerned by mass surveillance and the national security states combination of power and secrecy should keep worrying.
In other words, telephone surveillance by the NSA is the least of our worries.
Even with restrictions on its ability to collect mass quantities of telephone metadata, the government and its various spy agencies, from the NSA to the FBI, can still employ an endless number of methods for carrying out warrantless surveillance on Americans, all of which are far more invasive than the bulk collection program.
Continued at.........
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article42044.htm