Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 10:30 PM Jul 2016

Putin's Party?

http://www.weeklystandard.com/putins-party/article/2003473/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=t.co&utm_campaign=20160724_TWS-blog-putin-party-2_twitter&utm_content=TWS

Donald J. Trump is the presidential nominee of the Republican party. But that does not absolve every Republican office holder, donor, and activist from the responsibility of satisfying himself that it is right to support that nominee for president. There are, in my judgment, many reasons to doubt this is the case. But one reason in particular hasn't received sufficient consideration: The fact that Trump and his top campaign aide have many troubling connections with Vladimir Putin's regime.

Honest and patriotic Republicans who support Trump, or are tempted to do so, should review some of the publicly available evidence. Trump's business seems to be heavily dependent on Russian investment. His top campaign advisor, Paul Manafort, was the advisor to the Putin-backed stooge Viktor Yanukovich, and has deep ties to the Putin apparat. One of Trump's national security advisors, retired Lt. General Michael Flynn, was paid to give a speech at a Russian propaganda celebration and was seated next to Putin. Trump's Russia advisor Carter Page, who does much of his business with Russian companies, has argued, among other things, that "a few officials in Washington" annexed Ukraine and that the "so-called annexation" of Crimea by Russia was a rational response to this injustice.


I know its the Weekly Standard, but its pretty damning when Bill Kristol, long a GOP operative, is essentially accusing his party's nominee of treason. Spread this, and spread it far.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

David__77

(23,644 posts)
1. I don't find it surprising that Weekly Standard would have this position.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 10:33 PM
Jul 2016

It's not one that I think self-identified progressives should duplicate.

 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
2. why not at least air it so people here
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 10:34 PM
Jul 2016

who may have Republican-leaning or undecided friends/family have a way to sway them against Trump.

David__77

(23,644 posts)
3. I think it's great to air, sure.
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 10:35 PM
Jul 2016

I don't really know that that brand of conservatism is really too hot presently.

 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
5. its from a "leading conservative paper"
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 10:36 PM
Jul 2016

I mean aside from politicos, to an average person, who knows what the hell the difference between NR, WS, etc are? The article does well as a forwarded email, shared FB post, etc.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
4. Why hasn't all trump and family businesses
Mon Jul 25, 2016, 10:35 PM
Jul 2016

Been put in a blind trust. Ivanka is still selling her Chinese made dresses on Amazon.

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
6. Isn't that a requirement, or is it only a custom,
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 05:40 AM
Jul 2016

that a POTUS be effectively separated from any personal business interests?

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
8. Kristol is a Neocon, Neocon's hate Trump and hence support Hillary.
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 09:22 AM
Jul 2016

I know it seems weird, but US politics is weird. Nothing surprising about it.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Putin's Party?