GOOD READ. What's Really Happening When Asylum-Seeking Families Are Separated?
An expert on helping parents navigate the asylum process describes what shes seeing on the ground.
https://www.texasmonthly.com/news/whats-really-happening-asylum-seeking-families-separated/
This interview has been edited for clarity and length.
Texas Monthly: First, can you give us an overview of your organization?
Anne Chandler: We run the Childrens Border Project, and we work with hundreds of kids that have been released from ORR (Office of Refugee Resettlement) care. We are not a legal service provider that does work when theyre in the shelters. To date, most of our work with that issue of family separation has been working with the parents in the days when they are being separated: when theyre in the federal courthouse being convicted; partnering with the federal public defenders; and then in the adult detention center, as they have no idea how to communicate or speak to their children or get them back before being deported.
TM: Can you take me through what youve been seeing?
AC: The short of it is, we will take sample sizes of numbers and individuals were seeing that are being prosecuted for criminal entry. The majority of those are free to return to the home country. Vast majority. We cant quite know exactly because our sample size is between one hundred and two hundred individuals. But 90 percent of those who are being convicted are having their children separated from them. The 10 percent that arent are some mothers who are going with their children to the detention centers in Karnes and Dilley. But, for the most part, the ones that Ive been working with are the ones that are actually being prosecuted for criminal entry, which is a pretty new thing for our countryto take first-time asylum seekers who are here seeking safe refuge, to turn around and charge them with a criminal offense. Those parents are finding themselves in adult detention centers and in a process known as expedited removal, where many are being deported. And their children, on the other hand, are put in a completely different legal structure. They are categorized as unaccompanied children and thus are being put in place in a federal agency not with the Department of Homeland Security but with Health and Human Services. And Health and Human Services has this complicated structure in place where theyre not viewed as a long-term foster care systemthats for very limited numbersbut their general mandate is to safeguard these children in temporary shelters and then find family members with whom they can be placed. So they start with parents, and then they go to grandparents, and then they go to other immediate family members, and then they go to acquaintances, people whove known the children, and theyre in that system but they cant be released to their parents because their parents are behind bars. And we may see more parents that get out of jail because they pass a credible fear interview, which is the screening done by the asylum office to see who should be deported quickly, within days or weeks of arrival, and who should stay here and have an opportunity to present their asylum case before an immigration judge of the Department of Justice. So we have a lot of individuals who are in that credible fear process right now, but in Houston, once you have a credible fear interview (which will sometimes take two to three weeks to even set up), those results arent coming out for four to six weeks. Meanwhile, these parents are just kind of languishing in these detention centers because of the zero-tolerance policy. Theres no individual adjudication of whether the parents should be put on some form of alternative detention program so that they can be in a position to be reunited with their kid.
TM: So, just so I make sure I understand: the parents come in and say, Were persecuted or give some reason for asylum. They come in. And then their child or children are taken away and theyre in lockup for at least six weeks away from the kids and often dont know where the kids are. Is that whats happening under zero tolerance?
AC: So the idea of zero tolerance under the stated policy is that we dont care why youre afraid. We dont care if its religion, political, gangs, anything. For all asylum seekers, you are going to be put in jail, in a detention center, and youre going to have your children taken away from you. Thats the policy. Theyre not 100 percent able to implement that because of a lot of reasons including just having enough judges on the border. And bed space. Theres a big logistical problem because this is a new policy. So the way they get to that policy of taking the kids away and keeping the adults in detention centers and the kids in a different federal facility is based on the legal rationale that were going to convict you, and since were going to convict you, youre going to be in the custody of the U.S. Marshals, and when that happens, were taking your kid away. So theyre not able to convict everybody of illegal entry right now just because there arent enough judges on the border right now to hear the number of cases that come over, and then they say if you have religious persecution or political persecution or persecution on something that our asylum definition recognizes, you can fight that case behind bars at an immigration detention center. And those cases take two, three, four, five, six months. And what happens to your child isnt really our concern. That is, you have made the choice to bring your child over illegally. And this is whats going to happen.
DURHAM D
(32,619 posts)The media (and everyone else including DUers) asserts over and over again that these people have "entered" the country "illegally".
Identifying yourself to our government at the border and requesting asylum (permission to enter) is not "entering the country illegally".
underpants
(183,071 posts)But hey, where would we be if the media bothered to tell the whole story on anything? Or if they didn't all just fall back on the use of the same words and phrases?
Nitram
(22,985 posts)The "media" include the good the bad and the ugly. Figure out which is which and you'll go far.
Nitram
(22,985 posts)That was reported on NPR this morning by a Republican congressman (who was entirely opposed to the policy).