Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Congress Wants To Give Jeff Sessions Unprecedented New Drug War Powers
ThisIsNotNormalHat Retweeted:If you thought Jeff Sessions had too much power already, you should see the new drug war bill Congress is about to pass.
Link to tweet
Congress Wants To Give Jeff Sessions Unprecedented New Drug War Powers
The SITSA Act would turn the attorney general into the chief arbiter of what substances Americans can buy, sell, and put in their bodies.
Mike Riggs|Jun. 20, 2018 1:15 pm
If you think the Department of Justice has more than enough tools to wage the war on drugs, a bill passed by the House would create a fast-track scheduling system that could lead to the criminalization of kratom, nootropics, and pretty much anything that gives you a buzz and isn't already illegal.
The House of Representatives voted on Friday to create a new schedule of banned drugs under the Controlled Substances Act, called "Schedule A," and to give Attorney General Jeff Sessions broad new powers to criminalize the manufacturing, importation, and sale of substances that are currently unregulated, but not illegal. The bill is now headed to the Senate, where co-sponsors Dianne Feinstein (DCalif.) and Chuck Grassley (RIowa) will likely have little problem whipping votes.
The Stop the Importation and Trafficking of Synthetic Analogs Act, or SITSA, is intended to crack down on drugs that closely resemble currently banned or regulated substances in either their chemical structure or intended effects. SITSA would also empower the attorney general (A.G.) to add drugs to this new schedule with few checks from other branches of government.
....
When SITSA came up for a vote in the House, the House Liberty Caucus released a statement {see the .jpg below} condemning the decision to "cede more of Congress's legislative authority to the Attorney General and grant the AG more power to fight the war on drugs, which has eroded federalism, eviscerated numerous individual rights, entrenched severe discrimination in our criminal justice system, and failed to meaningfully limit the proliferation of illicit drugs."
Thanks to the advocacy of Rep. Justin Amash (RMich.) and others, provisions were added to the House version of SITSA that appear to constrain the attorney generalthough they probably won't. "Even with the sponsor's amendment," says the Liberty Caucus's statement, "this bill allows the AG to schedule substances permanently without significant input or involvement by the Department of Health and Services."
The SITSA Act would turn the attorney general into the chief arbiter of what substances Americans can buy, sell, and put in their bodies.
Mike Riggs|Jun. 20, 2018 1:15 pm
If you think the Department of Justice has more than enough tools to wage the war on drugs, a bill passed by the House would create a fast-track scheduling system that could lead to the criminalization of kratom, nootropics, and pretty much anything that gives you a buzz and isn't already illegal.
The House of Representatives voted on Friday to create a new schedule of banned drugs under the Controlled Substances Act, called "Schedule A," and to give Attorney General Jeff Sessions broad new powers to criminalize the manufacturing, importation, and sale of substances that are currently unregulated, but not illegal. The bill is now headed to the Senate, where co-sponsors Dianne Feinstein (DCalif.) and Chuck Grassley (RIowa) will likely have little problem whipping votes.
The Stop the Importation and Trafficking of Synthetic Analogs Act, or SITSA, is intended to crack down on drugs that closely resemble currently banned or regulated substances in either their chemical structure or intended effects. SITSA would also empower the attorney general (A.G.) to add drugs to this new schedule with few checks from other branches of government.
....
When SITSA came up for a vote in the House, the House Liberty Caucus released a statement {see the .jpg below} condemning the decision to "cede more of Congress's legislative authority to the Attorney General and grant the AG more power to fight the war on drugs, which has eroded federalism, eviscerated numerous individual rights, entrenched severe discrimination in our criminal justice system, and failed to meaningfully limit the proliferation of illicit drugs."
Thanks to the advocacy of Rep. Justin Amash (RMich.) and others, provisions were added to the House version of SITSA that appear to constrain the attorney generalthough they probably won't. "Even with the sponsor's amendment," says the Liberty Caucus's statement, "this bill allows the AG to schedule substances permanently without significant input or involvement by the Department of Health and Services."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1261 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Congress Wants To Give Jeff Sessions Unprecedented New Drug War Powers (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2018
OP
Sen Feinstein a cosponsor? Is she deliberately trying to get defeated in Ca in Nov by(Dem) opponent
stuffmatters
Jun 2018
#2
dhill926
(16,393 posts)1. yeah....great idea.....
jesus christ....
stuffmatters
(2,574 posts)2. Sen Feinstein a cosponsor? Is she deliberately trying to get defeated in Ca in Nov by(Dem) opponent
Just because she made it through the jungle primary with huge numbers does not mean she is safe. I don't think I'm the only Dem who voted for her just to make sure a Dem was on the Nov ballot.
Now she's running against another Dem. in Ca, where Dem voters have zero appetite for increasing the social injustice & taxpayer burden of drug arrests, prosecutions, incarcerations.
This is very "uncool"of Feinstein and is going to send lots of voters to her Dem rival IMHO.