Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Republicans trying to further stuff the courts with judges: How Dems could act.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/02/trump-judicial-appointments-mcconnell-democrats-chris-kang.htmlThe conventional wisdom on both sides is that because Democrats are now in the minority, and judges can now be confirmed with a simple majority vote, Democrats dont have any leverage. As long as both sides buy into that theory, the White House has no incentive to actually work with Democratic senators. And Republican senators have no incentive to back down.
What I think the Democratic senators need to realize is they actually have a lot of power and influence left still. The irony is that the power they have left is in the blue slips. They still have blue slips to prevent district court nominees from moving forward. This is something that Sen. Graham has repeated now many times in his scant few weeks here as Judiciary chairman: that he will continue to observe the blue slip process for district court vacancies.
What I think the Democratic senators need to realize is they actually have a lot of power and influence left still. The irony is that the power they have left is in the blue slips. They still have blue slips to prevent district court nominees from moving forward. This is something that Sen. Graham has repeated now many times in his scant few weeks here as Judiciary chairman: that he will continue to observe the blue slip process for district court vacancies.
If every Democratic senator says were going to withhold the 76 blue slips we have, that would stop President Trump from being able to fill almost half the judicial vacancies that exist now. That changes the incentive structure. That changes the ability to have a conversation and really push to get better judges in the circuit court system and maybe restore some semblance of a blue slip process for circuit courts.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1070 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans trying to further stuff the courts with judges: How Dems could act. (Original Post)
sharedvalues
Feb 2019
OP
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)1. And to address "Republicans would do the same later"
This idea that theres going to be something bigger down the line thats going to be more important than the courts is fundamentally misunderstanding the role and the importance of our courts. But also, the idea that if Democrats just play nice, Republicans will be bipartisan down the line is laughable.
I think one of the most frustrating things to me has been that Democrats dont have any response whenever Republicans change the rules. So, for example, when Republicans changed the voting threshold for Neil Gorsuch and jammed him through, what did Democrats do in response? They didnt institutionally as a caucus have any response. When Republicans were running a sham confirmation process for Brett Kavanaugh, Democrats decided that that would be the time that theyd start letting judicial nominees move by unanimous consent.
Meanwhile, look what Republicans did when Democrats changed the rules to overcome Republican obstruction on the courts in 2013. In response, Republicans forced Democrats to file 130 cloture votes in a 13-month periodthere have only been 90 in history before that. Thats a response.
...
I will say that Sen. Mazie Hirono has been the leader on this. Once Republicans first ignored a Democratic senators blue slip and moved forward the nomination of David Stras, she started voting no on every single Trump judge on cloture. Weve seen just last week Sens. Kamala Harris and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrandbecause their blue slip prerogative has been overruledtheyve come out and said theyre going to vote no on every single circuit judge.
Thats an important shift in the mentality to begin looking beyond the individual nominees that they object to, but at the end of the day its not going to actually change the incentive structure. Democrats withholding their blue slips on district court nominees would.
I think one of the most frustrating things to me has been that Democrats dont have any response whenever Republicans change the rules. So, for example, when Republicans changed the voting threshold for Neil Gorsuch and jammed him through, what did Democrats do in response? They didnt institutionally as a caucus have any response. When Republicans were running a sham confirmation process for Brett Kavanaugh, Democrats decided that that would be the time that theyd start letting judicial nominees move by unanimous consent.
Meanwhile, look what Republicans did when Democrats changed the rules to overcome Republican obstruction on the courts in 2013. In response, Republicans forced Democrats to file 130 cloture votes in a 13-month periodthere have only been 90 in history before that. Thats a response.
...
I will say that Sen. Mazie Hirono has been the leader on this. Once Republicans first ignored a Democratic senators blue slip and moved forward the nomination of David Stras, she started voting no on every single Trump judge on cloture. Weve seen just last week Sens. Kamala Harris and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrandbecause their blue slip prerogative has been overruledtheyve come out and said theyre going to vote no on every single circuit judge.
Thats an important shift in the mentality to begin looking beyond the individual nominees that they object to, but at the end of the day its not going to actually change the incentive structure. Democrats withholding their blue slips on district court nominees would.