Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(131,223 posts)
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 04:26 PM Jan 2020

Why We Voted Against the War Powers Resolution

By Elaine Luria and Max Rose
Ms. Luria and Mr. Rose are Democratic members of the House of Representatives.

'Congress should be debating laws governing the use of force, not symbolic resolutions.

The most consequential decision a member of Congress can make is whether to send troops into harm’s way, and it is one we take seriously and personally. We both served in the greater Middle East and saw the impact of these intractable conflicts on our fellow service members and their families. Our military personnel are our nation’s most valuable asset; we must not send them into unnecessary war.

We voted against the War Powers Resolution that the House passed this week because it merely restated existing law. It addressed a de-escalated conflict with a symbolic vote that did more to distract than to fix the real challenges we face. If Congress wants to assert its power to declare war, we must take on the hard task of publicly debating a new Authorization for Use of Military Force, the A.U.M.F., as it’s commonly called, as well as congressional appropriations for military operations. That is where decisions of war and peace are made. . .

While we respect our colleagues who serve our nation and supported this resolution, the debate Congress should have is not whether the president had the authority to carry out the Suleimani killing, but rather how we move forward as a governing body if we must commit forces in future sustained combat operations to protect our nation.

It is Congress’s responsibility to act as a check on presidential power — and that includes on matters relating to war. This past week underscored that the United States is operating under outdated laws governing the use of force. We must replace the nearly two-decade-old A.U.M.F.s with a legal framework that empowers the president to act against threats to our nation while constraining him from unilaterally placing us on a path to war. We must also use the power of the purse in stating our military objectives.'>>>

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/11/opinion/Max-Rose-Elaine-Luria-War-Powers-Vote.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why We Voted Against the War Powers Resolution (Original Post) elleng Jan 2020 OP
Where's your revised AUMF then? bitterross Jan 2020 #1
THIS!! BlueMTexpat Jan 2020 #5
I find myself in agreement with them. PatrickforO Jan 2020 #2
So They Couldn't Emphasize the Need By Voting For The Bill? Me. Jan 2020 #3
I cannot agree with this statement Ferrets are Cool Jan 2020 #4

PatrickforO

(14,599 posts)
2. I find myself in agreement with them.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 04:33 PM
Jan 2020

They need to debate the AUMF and make changes in it to have any lasting effect.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Why We Voted Against the ...