Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dulcinea

(6,671 posts)
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 11:05 AM Jan 2020

Impeachment Trial Recap: Trump Lawyers Forge Ahead, Rejecting Bolton Relevance

President Trump's lawyers tore into Democrats' impeachment allegations on Monday with a legal and political pageant that culminated with a rejection of the relevance of new allegations from John Bolton.

Retired law professor Alan Dershowitz closed the day's arguments with a stemwinder about what he called the constitutional weaknesses of the case against Trump.

The framers of the Constitution intended for the foundation of the law to be precisely defined crimes that could then be precisely enforced, he said — and no such crimes are alleged in the Trump matter.

Moreover, Dershowitz argued, the framers explicitly would have rejected the phrases in the articles of impeachment passed last month in the House. Any potential testimony by former national security adviser Bolton about what Trump told him is accordingly immaterial, Dershowitz said.

https://www.npr.org/2020/01/27/800231302/impeachment-trial-recap-trump-lawyers-sortie-but-eschew-bolton-issue

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Impeachment Trial Recap: Trump Lawyers Forge Ahead, Rejecting Bolton Relevance (Original Post) Dulcinea Jan 2020 OP
So Bolton's testimony isn't relevant but Hunter Biden's is? SunSeeker Jan 2020 #1
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Impeachment Trial Recap: ...