Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

salvorhardin

(9,995 posts)
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 06:00 PM Jun 2012

Malcolm Gladwell Unmasked: A Look Into the Life & Work of America’s Most Successful Propagandist

I'm not familiar with this site, or the people behind it, so caveat lector. Note: I posted this in GD too, but because of its length I suspect it'll sink like a stone there, so I'm putting it here too where it might have a longer shelf life.

Gladwell was trained up in the same corporate-funded network of training and “education” institutes and outfits responsible for churning out the likes of Michelle Malkin, convicted criminal James O’Keefe, Dinesh D’Souza and countless other GOP corporate activists. The difference: Unlike Gladwell, they rarely hid their ideological willingness to take cash in exchange for promoting the corporate right’s agenda.

While a student at the University of Toronto, Gladwell’s admiration for Ronald Reagan led him into conservative activist circles. In 1982, while still an undergrad, he completed a 12-week training course at the National Journalism Center, a corporate-funded program created to counter the media’s alleged “anti-business bias” by molding college kids into corporate-friendly journalist-operatives and helping them infiltrate top-tier news media organizations. To quote Philip Morris, a major supporter of the National Journalism Center, its mission was to "train budding journalists in free market political and economic principles." Over the years the National Journalism Center has produced hundreds of pro-business news media moles, including top-tier conservative talent like Ann Coulter and former Wall Street Journal columnist and editorial board member John Fund.

After graduating from University of Toronto in 1984, Gladwell spent a few years bouncing around the far-right fringe of the corporate media spectrum. He wrote for the American Spectator—notorious in the 1990s as the primary media organ promoting anti-Clinton conspiracy theories—as well as the Moonie-owned Insight on the News. From 1985-6, Gladwell served as assistant editor at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, which was created to bridge the gap between neoconservatives and Christian fundamentalists and help the two hostile factions to come together to counter a common enemy: activists fighting for economic justice. Rick Santorum was a fellow at EPPC until June 2011, when he left to concentrate on his attempt to secure the 2012 GOP presidential nomination.

...

From the get-go, Gladwell’s reporting stands out for its unabashedly pro-business, anti-regulation bias. Nowhere was this bias more evident than in Gladwell’s barely disguised promotion of the tobacco industry’s agenda. Gladwell’s reporting on tobacco issues in the early '90s came just as Big Tobacco was was gearing up for its war against looming class-action lawsuits, as well as the mounting pressure for stricter regulation of the industry. As the Post's business and science reporter, Gladwell carried the tobacco lobby’s water—and messages—while raising doubts about the industry’s critics.

One of the more obvious and disgusting examples: In 1990, Gladwell published a rank scare-article arguing that any moves to cut Americans’ smoking habits could "put a serious strain on the nation's Social Security and Medicare programs"--meaning that high levels of smoking was helping keep America's social safety from going bankrupt, since so many were dying before they could collect.

Full article (long: ~6,800 words): http://www.shameproject.com/report/malcolm-gladwell-unmasked-life-work-of-americas-most-successful-propagandist
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Malcolm Gladwell Unmasked: A Look Into the Life & Work of America’s Most Successful Propagandist (Original Post) salvorhardin Jun 2012 OP
how disappointing to hear Gladwell... NJCher Jun 2012 #1
No matter what he did, something that calls itself the shame project is probably worse WriteWrong Jun 2012 #2
It's always been fairly obvious to me. DeltaLitProf Jun 2012 #3
Whatever. I still like his books. tinrobot Jun 2012 #4
Me too. I've read his stuff and it's fascinating. Zoeisright Jun 2012 #5

NJCher

(35,842 posts)
1. how disappointing to hear Gladwell...
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 06:16 PM
Jun 2012

Thanks for the link. I've spent many an hour reading Gladwell and enjoyed it very much. The topics Gladwell writes on are so interesting.

A look over the site you alert us to makes me think it's credible. While I'll reserve judgement until I finish the article, it's not looking good for Gladwell, IMO.


Cher

 

WriteWrong

(85 posts)
2. No matter what he did, something that calls itself the shame project is probably worse
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 07:55 PM
Jun 2012

I am SO TIRED of that argument - I grew up with it with drunks

1. I'm a worthless piece of shit that deserves to be beat up
2. You're no better than I am
3. Shiv in the gut

...not to mention the suspicions raised by their anti-intellectualism and apparently serious advocacy of public shaming as a technique of social control. Sorry, once that gets normalized and accepted, the chance of liberals or progressives gaining is almost absolutely zero.

And given that there are so many more famous, more powerful, more influential right-wing voices - the Kochs, for example - I am a lot more suspicious than trusting.

Here you go - may as well get the story right.

http://tccwrite.blogspot.com/2010/10/public-hating-lesson-in-execution.html

DeltaLitProf

(771 posts)
3. It's always been fairly obvious to me.
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 09:29 AM
Jun 2012

The guy's work always seems to land on the idea that ordinary people don't really know their best interests and that instead we should trust genius, think-out-of-the-box, breezy executives to show us the way to well-being. No thanks. We have our own geniuses.

tinrobot

(10,927 posts)
4. Whatever. I still like his books.
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 10:06 AM
Jun 2012

I've never read his 'conservative' articles, but I have read a few of his books and I liked them.

Guess what? I'm still as liberal as ever, even though I read the works of a 'successful propagandist'. His supposed 'propaganda' wasn't very successful on me.

Zoeisright

(8,339 posts)
5. Me too. I've read his stuff and it's fascinating.
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 12:04 AM
Jun 2012

I had no idea he's conservative. He didn't change my political philosophy one iota.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Malcolm Gladwell Unmasked...