Malcolm Gladwell Unmasked: A Look Into the Life & Work of America’s Most Successful Propagandist
I'm not familiar with this site, or the people behind it, so caveat lector. Note: I posted this in GD too, but because of its length I suspect it'll sink like a stone there, so I'm putting it here too where it might have a longer shelf life.
While a student at the University of Toronto, Gladwells admiration for Ronald Reagan led him into conservative activist circles. In 1982, while still an undergrad, he completed a 12-week training course at the National Journalism Center, a corporate-funded program created to counter the medias alleged anti-business bias by molding college kids into corporate-friendly journalist-operatives and helping them infiltrate top-tier news media organizations. To quote Philip Morris, a major supporter of the National Journalism Center, its mission was to "train budding journalists in free market political and economic principles." Over the years the National Journalism Center has produced hundreds of pro-business news media moles, including top-tier conservative talent like Ann Coulter and former Wall Street Journal columnist and editorial board member John Fund.
After graduating from University of Toronto in 1984, Gladwell spent a few years bouncing around the far-right fringe of the corporate media spectrum. He wrote for the American Spectatornotorious in the 1990s as the primary media organ promoting anti-Clinton conspiracy theoriesas well as the Moonie-owned Insight on the News. From 1985-6, Gladwell served as assistant editor at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, which was created to bridge the gap between neoconservatives and Christian fundamentalists and help the two hostile factions to come together to counter a common enemy: activists fighting for economic justice. Rick Santorum was a fellow at EPPC until June 2011, when he left to concentrate on his attempt to secure the 2012 GOP presidential nomination.
...
From the get-go, Gladwells reporting stands out for its unabashedly pro-business, anti-regulation bias. Nowhere was this bias more evident than in Gladwells barely disguised promotion of the tobacco industrys agenda. Gladwells reporting on tobacco issues in the early '90s came just as Big Tobacco was was gearing up for its war against looming class-action lawsuits, as well as the mounting pressure for stricter regulation of the industry. As the Post's business and science reporter, Gladwell carried the tobacco lobbys waterand messageswhile raising doubts about the industrys critics.
One of the more obvious and disgusting examples: In 1990, Gladwell published a rank scare-article arguing that any moves to cut Americans smoking habits could "put a serious strain on the nation's Social Security and Medicare programs"--meaning that high levels of smoking was helping keep America's social safety from going bankrupt, since so many were dying before they could collect.
Full article (long: ~6,800 words): http://www.shameproject.com/report/malcolm-gladwell-unmasked-life-work-of-americas-most-successful-propagandist
NJCher
(35,842 posts)Thanks for the link. I've spent many an hour reading Gladwell and enjoyed it very much. The topics Gladwell writes on are so interesting.
A look over the site you alert us to makes me think it's credible. While I'll reserve judgement until I finish the article, it's not looking good for Gladwell, IMO.
Cher
WriteWrong
(85 posts)I am SO TIRED of that argument - I grew up with it with drunks
1. I'm a worthless piece of shit that deserves to be beat up
2. You're no better than I am
3. Shiv in the gut
...not to mention the suspicions raised by their anti-intellectualism and apparently serious advocacy of public shaming as a technique of social control. Sorry, once that gets normalized and accepted, the chance of liberals or progressives gaining is almost absolutely zero.
And given that there are so many more famous, more powerful, more influential right-wing voices - the Kochs, for example - I am a lot more suspicious than trusting.
Here you go - may as well get the story right.
http://tccwrite.blogspot.com/2010/10/public-hating-lesson-in-execution.html
DeltaLitProf
(771 posts)The guy's work always seems to land on the idea that ordinary people don't really know their best interests and that instead we should trust genius, think-out-of-the-box, breezy executives to show us the way to well-being. No thanks. We have our own geniuses.
tinrobot
(10,927 posts)I've never read his 'conservative' articles, but I have read a few of his books and I liked them.
Guess what? I'm still as liberal as ever, even though I read the works of a 'successful propagandist'. His supposed 'propaganda' wasn't very successful on me.
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)I had no idea he's conservative. He didn't change my political philosophy one iota.