Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 10:23 PM Jun 2012

Smart people are especially prone to stupid mistakes

By Cory Doctorow at 5:44 pm Wednesday, Jun 13
Jonah Lehrer takes to The New Yorker to discuss Thinking, Fast and Slow, the latest book from Daniel Kahneman, a psychologist who's won the Nobel prize in economics. Lehrer discusses Kahneman's contention that smart people are no less prone to cognitive bias than anyone else, but are prone to believing that they are immune to error. Kahneman himself admits that he makes systematic cognitive errors all the time, even though he's devoted his career to studying them.

This has particularly grim implications for a society that thinks it is a meritocracy but is really an oligarchy, because the competitively educated people at the top believe (incorrectly) that they don't need to have their intuitions reviewed by lesser mortals.

And here’s the upsetting punch line: intelligence seems to make things worse. The scientists gave the students four measures of “cognitive sophistication.” As they report in the paper, all four of the measures showed positive correlations, “indicating that more cognitively sophisticated participants showed larger bias blind spots.” This trend held for many of the specific biases, indicating that smarter people (at least as measured by S.A.T. scores) and those more likely to engage in deliberation were slightly more vulnerable to common mental mistakes. Education also isn’t a savior; as Kahneman and Shane Frederick first noted many years ago, more than fifty per cent of students at Harvard, Princeton, and M.I.T. gave the incorrect answer to the bat-and-ball question.

What explains this result? One provocative hypothesis is that the bias blind spot arises because of a mismatch between how we evaluate others and how we evaluate ourselves. When considering the irrational choices of a stranger, for instance, we are forced to rely on behavioral information; we see their biases from the outside, which allows us to glimpse their systematic thinking errors. However, when assessing our own bad choices, we tend to engage in elaborate introspection. We scrutinize our motivations and search for relevant reasons; we lament our mistakes to therapists and ruminate on the beliefs that led us astray.



more

http://boingboing.net/2012/06/13/smart-people-are-especially-pr.html
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Smart people are especially prone to stupid mistakes (Original Post) n2doc Jun 2012 OP
I must be a freakin genius then... Kalidurga Jun 2012 #1
I can't recommend this enough. Gregorian Jun 2012 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author AverageJoe90 Jun 2012 #3
I qualified for Mensa, but... lastlib Jun 2012 #4
Olesha's "Envy" Igel Jun 2012 #5
Sure. Igel Jun 2012 #6

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
1. I must be a freakin genius then...
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 10:27 PM
Jun 2012

Seriously I have had people tell me I am pretty smart, but some of the boneheaded things I have done makes me wonder....

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
2. I can't recommend this enough.
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 10:45 PM
Jun 2012


And you can add something to this phenomenon which makes it far more insidious. Power. We have a society, almost an entire world, of people who now have more power at their disposal than is healthy. We have taken the absolutely brilliant concepts of the greatest minds who ever lived, like Archimedes and Newton, and not only used them to create better lives for ourselves, but to destroy. This, to me, is the ultimate irony. How we have taken and used the greatest thoughts, and abused them. I've always said that we were the specie that didn't know when to stop. I see this as using something good in a way that is actually counterproductive and harmful. What better example can one find than our use of the internal combustion engine. We are literally choking our own source of sustenance through the use of something that once improved our lives. It's a cognizant blind spot on a global scale.

Response to n2doc (Original post)

Igel

(35,393 posts)
5. Olesha's "Envy"
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 10:57 AM
Jun 2012

Short novel from the 1920s. He has two "heroes". One is fashionable and efficient, productive and positivist. The other is never as well dressed, inefficient, not so productive, and more squishy in his thinking.

Near the beginning of the novel Olesha has his narrator say that objects like the first hero, but that objects don't like the second every-man hero.

Igel

(35,393 posts)
6. Sure.
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 11:01 AM
Jun 2012

Then you have to look at policy implications.

We'll focus on having a small cadre of experts decide about a corporation's actions.

They'll focus on having a small cadre of experts decide on government actions.

The first is Love Canal.

The second is kudzu.

Decentralization and going slow is good. Often the idiots have as much wisdom--just less knowledge--as the expert. ("Wise" is a word that's pretty much relegated to folk narratives these days, judged archaic, or quasi 3rd-world cultures. I use the smart/intelligent/wise distinction actively in class. Confuses the hell out of the high school students.)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Smart people are especial...