Resolve to Overturn 'Citizens United' Spreads Through the States | The Nation
Writing for the majority in the Supreme Courts Citizens United decision, Justice Anthony Kennedy argued that independent expenditures by corporations do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption.
Since then, Super-PACs and corporations have spent record amounts of money in elections nationwide. Corporate spending soared during the 2010 election cycle to $294 million, 427 percent over the previous midterm elections in 2006. Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsberg and Stephen Breyer both suggested that given these huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates allegiance, Kennedys assertion doesnt hold and the court should reconsider its ruling.
...People dont want to see a repeat of Wisconsin, where more than $63 million was spent in the recall election ($50 million went to Walker)much of it from out of state, including $24 million from outside groups. Local public officials also realize that they cant raise the kind of resources a handpicked, corporate-favored candidate can now access. There is also an obscenely exorbitant presidential campaign on the horizon with a price tag expected to reach $2 billion or more, including hundreds of millions of dollars flowing in from wealthy and corporate interests. In May alone, conservative groups spent $20 million in just nine swing states and Michigan.
Legislators have clearly reached their own conclusion that there is an appearance of corruption. Twenty-two states and the District of Columbia have joined Montana in asking the Supreme Court to uphold the states ban on corporate expenditures. This coalition is a mix of red, blue, and purple states, including New York, Arkansas, California, Idaho, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nevada, North Carolina, Utah, Vermont and West Virginia. Senators John McCain and Sheldon Whitehouse also filed an amicus brief in support of Montana,writing, Evidence from the 2010 and 2012 electoral cycles has demonstrated that so-called independent expenditures create a strong potential for corruption and the perception thereof.
This Resolutions Week, many members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, including co-chairs Raúl M. Grijalva and Keith Ellison, are supporting city and town councils and state legislatures as they push for a Constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United. Local efforts will be held across the nation: from Baker City, Oregon, to Huntsville, Alabama; Wichita, Kansas, to Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania; Provo, Utah, to Corpus Christi, Texas. Dozens of localities have already approved similar resolutions.
post is here: http://laborspains.blogspot.com/2012/06/resolve-to-overturn-citizens-united.html
Original post: http://www.thenation.com/blog/168346/resolve-overturn-citizens-united-spreads-through-states
longship
(40,416 posts)R&K
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)as soon as Nov 3 too.
summerschild
(725 posts)I've searched and searched and (except for now retired Justice Stevens) haven't found one word from any of Roberts' henchmen.
Other than Alito's display of headshaking and mouthing during the State of the Union address, I've never seen or heard a word from these turds about this assault on democracy.
Uncle Joe
(58,596 posts)screamed this would be the case.
Money and power on an unlimited scale are corruptive influences, people have known this for thousands of years!
Legislators have clearly reached their own conclusion that there is an appearance of corruption. Twenty-two states and the District of Columbia have joined Montana in asking the Supreme Court to uphold the states ban on corporate expenditures. This coalition is a mix of red, blue, and purple states, including New York, Arkansas, California, Idaho, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nevada, North Carolina, Utah, Vermont and West Virginia. Senators John McCain and Sheldon Whitehouse also filed an amicus brief in support of Montana,writing, Evidence from the 2010 and 2012 electoral cycles has demonstrated that so-called independent expenditures create a strong potential for corruption and the perception thereof.
Thanks for the thread, geefloyd.