Do Liberals Actually Want To Win Elections?
Ouch!
http://www.nationalmemo.com/do-liberals-actually-want-to-win-elections/
Do Liberals Actually Want To Win Elections?
June 26th, 2012 10:59 pm Gene Lyons
Color my neck red, but I often suspect some progressives are more interested in demonstrating moral superiority than winning elections. Vicarious participation in emotionally satisfying public spectacles renders them incapable of thinking about how presumptively unenlightened voters might react. And yes, Im talking about you, MSNBC.
That woman holding a big sign for the TV cameras reading I am a SLUT with a VAGINA, and I vote, at a feminist pep rally in Michigan isnt thinking about how badly President Obama needs her states electoral votes. Nor how close polls show the Michigan contest to be. Shes thinking about demonstrating her contempt for Republican legislators.
It rarely occurs to such people that they might be driving voters in the opposite direction. Any more than it occurred to the dopes that showed up at early Tea Party rallies carrying guns. (Interesting how thats quit happening, isnt it?) Their first principle, always and everywhere, is displaying their righteousness.
But more about Michigans genital nomenclature dispute later.
The countercultural left, of course, has enjoyed alienating drones since Woodstock. But hippies arent the problem today. Indeed, its the posturing of highly-paid TV celebrities that has helped drive the Moral Indignation Wing of the Democratic Party into politically awkward positions in three critical swing statesat least two of which President Obama must win to be re-elected.
To fans of MSNBCs evening political infotainment shows, three news stories have often eclipsed the presidential race for top billing all spring: the Scott Walker recall election in Wisconsin, the Trayvon Martin case in Florida, and Michigans semantic squabble over womens naughty bits.
The networks handling of all three has been somewhere between embarrassing and reprehensible. Hosts and guests have taken active, partisan roles every bit as objectionable as, say, Fox Newss Sean Hannity. In each case, their journalism has proven even worse than their political judgment. Democratic politicians would be wise to reconsider putting in face time on MSNBC.
more...
http://www.nationalmemo.com/do-liberals-actually-want-to-win-elections/
onehandle
(51,122 posts)libinnyandia
(1,374 posts)yes if it means an evil candidate is defeated. No candidate is perfect but a Democrat is always better than a Republican, especially nowadays when Republican have gone rogue. "Tweedledum and Tweedledee" was never true.
villager
(26,001 posts)n/t
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)If the candidate is a conservative, that's a loss.
Even if they call themselves Democrats.
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)"If we lose it's the fault of liberals!" shit well in advance.
Another useless moron whining about people being all mean and partisan. The only ouch from this article is being reminded people this stupid actually exist.
Edited to add: Could this shit GET any more cultish, by the way?
"That woman holding a big sign for the TV cameras reading I am a SLUT with a VAGINA, and I vote, at a feminist pep rally in Michigan isnt thinking about how badly President Obama needs her states electoral votes."
All things must be for His glory! Revel in His word! Think of Him in everything you do, for all things happen for Him!
But by all means, what we really need to hear are more old white guys whining about how terrible protests that don't matter to them are.
marmar
(77,129 posts)nt
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Or do they only care about aiding corporations in exchange for campaign contributions and a cushy job when they leave government?
Quit blaming liberal voters for the electoral failures of corporate sell-outs.