Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Why Did Roberts Do It? To save the court.
Sometimes you just have to take one for the team. A wistful thought of that kind must have flitted through the mind of Chief Justice John Roberts today as he announced that the Supreme Court was upholding the Affordable Care Act by the slimmest of margins.The lineup was a shocker: Roberts joined the courts four moderate/liberal justices in upholding the act. Court-watchers knew Roberts would be in the majority, whichever way the case came out, but we expected Justice Anthony Kennedy to be there, too. He wasnt: Kennedy joined fellow conservative Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito in a vehement (anddeparting from court practicejointly signed) dissent. Indeed, the chief justice was the only justice who cast a vote on the individual mandate that was contrary to the political position of the party of the president who appointed him.
Why did he do it? Quite simply, to save the court. As Jeffrey Rosen has noted, the ACA case was John Roberts moment of truthand todays opinion proves that Roberts knew it. In the aftermath of Bush v. Gore and Citizens United, the percentage of Americans who say they have quite a lot or a great deal of confidence in the Supreme Court has dipped to the mid-30s. A 5-4 decision to strike down Obamacare along party lines, whatever its reasoning, would have been received by the general public as yet more proof that the court is merely an extension of the nations polarized politics. Add the fact that the legal challenges to the individual mandate were at best novel and at worst frivolous, and suddenly a one-vote takedown of the ACA looks like it might undermine the courts very legitimacy.
--more--
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2012/06/john_roberts_broke_with_conservatives_to_preserve_the_supreme_court_s_legitimacy.html
Add to "Bush v. Gore" and "Citizens United" the appearances of Scalia, Thomas, and Alito at right-wing political fundraisers like the Heritage Foundation (where Thomas's wife has received hundreds of thousands of dollars) and one could surmise that Rosen is on to something.
Maybe the present SCOTUS is simply incapable of interpreting the Constitution?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1658 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Did Roberts Do It? To save the court. (Original Post)
KansDem
Jun 2012
OP
I do not understand why he would care what the public thinks about the Court.
rhett o rick
Jun 2012
#3
Stuart G
(38,458 posts)1. Outstanding Post....thanks...K and R.nt
Lost-in-FL
(7,093 posts)2. A quote by Justice Roberts
"It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices."
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)3. I do not understand why he would care what the public thinks about the Court.
That would be like Georgie Bush deciding to not continue torture because of public opinion.