Why Russia Won't Abandon Syria
Nikolas K. Gvosdev | June 29, 2012
...
A consistent question posed by U.S. policy makers is the basis of the loyalty the Kremlin is showing to Assad. Why can't Moscow simply "cut a deal" with the revolutionary forces (assuming one could be brokered) and switch sides? If the Syria conflict existed in isolation, perhaps. But the steadfast support the Kremlin continues to provide to Assadshielding the regime against stronger UN sanctions and providing its security forces with the wherewithal to try to suppress the uprisingis meant to reassure another group of leaders: presidents in the post-Soviet space concerned with their own successions.
At a bare minimum, Russia cannot afford to be complicit in any overthrow of the Assad regime. Its support for the Annan plan was predicated on the assumption that it would leave Assad in the driver's seat in terms of charting Syria's political future. Keeping Assad's sovereign prerogatives intact is essential.
Read more: http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/why-russia-wont-abandon-syria-7140?page=1