Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jilly_in_VA

(10,008 posts)
Sat Mar 30, 2024, 12:44 PM Mar 30

DEI isn't the enemy. States like Alabama are afraid to own their history.

Sara Pequeño

When you think of the Civil Rights Movement, you probably think about Alabama. The state is associated with the worst of the Jim Crow Era, but also the people who stood against it.

It’s a shame that Alabama’s legislators would rather not talk about these things. Last week, the Alabama Legislature passed SB129, a law that will keep diversity, equity and inclusion offices from college campuses and other public entities. The law, which goes into effect Oct. 1, is one of 11 anti-DEI bills across nine states that have been signed into law since the beginning of 2023.

“I refuse to allow a few bad actors on college campuses – or wherever else for that matter – to go under the acronym of DEI, using taxpayer funds, to push their liberal political movement,” Gov. Kay Ivey said.

Ivey’s assessment of DEI initiatives and “divisive concepts,” as the bill puts it, highlights exactly why diversity in education is important. Pretending otherwise is a disservice to everyone in Alabama. Come November, voters should remember that elections can have a real impact on the laws their states enact.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/03/30/alabama-dei-bill-republican-ignore-american-history/73098502007/

The truth hurts, doesn't it, Madam Governor?
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DEI isn't the enemy. States like Alabama are afraid to own their history. (Original Post) Jilly_in_VA Mar 30 OP
Because it's not history leftieNanner Mar 30 #1
Why not talk about "the good side of slaver?" Botany Mar 30 #2
Code word for racism among the KKKult. usonian Mar 30 #3
It has little to do with history and much more to do with how they'd like to see the future. nt Biophilic Mar 30 #4
Maybe, each time they scream about DEI slightlv Mar 30 #5
The Merit Question boQwub-mydbuz-0nufnu Mar 30 #6

usonian

(9,909 posts)
3. Code word for racism among the KKKult.
Sat Mar 30, 2024, 01:06 PM
Mar 30
https://theblackwallsttimes.com/2024/03/27/is-dei-the-new-n-word/

Is DEI the New N-Word?

The terms diversity, equity, and inclusion have joined the list of buzzwords that bigots might use to back their prejudice.


Please read.

slightlv

(2,845 posts)
5. Maybe, each time they scream about DEI
Sat Mar 30, 2024, 01:39 PM
Mar 30

talking about it as a "liberal political movement" we should answer back something like... oh, you mean our Christian outreach movement! Keep reminding them how far from their Christ they actually are...

 
6. The Merit Question
Sat Mar 30, 2024, 02:42 PM
Mar 30

Critics of DEI will often suggest that the “Left” is attacking “colorblindbess” as an American principle. The idea is that “liberals” are pushing “identity politics” and creating an uneven competition for high demand spots, whether in companies or in universities, in sports, etc. Their claim is always that merit-based systems are the only fair way to administer access to jobs and education. However, we all know this was NEVER true. It was a myth, propaganda. Afterall, when the settlers began taking land, there was no merit in it, neither were their many requirements. Hundreds of acres of land were given away free or for minimal costs to any white settlers willing to go westward, willing to risk living on the frontier. But there was never any expectation that land-grabbers would ever contribute to greater society. Just possessing the land was enough, because it meant privatizing sections of seized territory. Much of this land was later deeded to churches and religious organizations as they were not required to report land that was donated, such as land left to the church in a will. All of that land that was “grabbed” was future wealth, setting a large portion of the white settlers on a path to always have more wealth, and therefore more say over the development of the country and its government. None of this was based on merit. Many of these in the west were people who came prepared to kill as many “Indians” as possible, same as buffalo and other fur trade. The bottom line is that, if the government can open land like that to the early settlers, there’s no reason DEI policies, Affirmative Action, and reparations for Blacks, Native Americans and interred Japanese can’t a priority. Similarly, the government has no problem subsidizing farming for struggling white farmers, but when it comes to everyone else, it’s a welfare dependency.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»DEI isn't the enemy. Stat...