DEI isn't the enemy. States like Alabama are afraid to own their history.
Sara PequeñoWhen you think of the Civil Rights Movement, you probably think about Alabama. The state is associated with the worst of the Jim Crow Era, but also the people who stood against it.
Its a shame that Alabamas legislators would rather not talk about these things. Last week, the Alabama Legislature passed SB129, a law that will keep diversity, equity and inclusion offices from college campuses and other public entities. The law, which goes into effect Oct. 1, is one of 11 anti-DEI bills across nine states that have been signed into law since the beginning of 2023.
I refuse to allow a few bad actors on college campuses or wherever else for that matter to go under the acronym of DEI, using taxpayer funds, to push their liberal political movement, Gov. Kay Ivey said.
Iveys assessment of DEI initiatives and divisive concepts, as the bill puts it, highlights exactly why diversity in education is important. Pretending otherwise is a disservice to everyone in Alabama. Come November, voters should remember that elections can have a real impact on the laws their states enact.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/03/30/alabama-dei-bill-republican-ignore-american-history/73098502007/
The truth hurts, doesn't it, Madam Governor?
leftieNanner
(15,173 posts)It's ongoing.
Botany
(70,594 posts)usonian
(9,909 posts)Is DEI the New N-Word?
Please read.
Biophilic
(3,704 posts)slightlv
(2,845 posts)talking about it as a "liberal political movement" we should answer back something like... oh, you mean our Christian outreach movement! Keep reminding them how far from their Christ they actually are...
boQwub-mydbuz-0nufnu
(4 posts)Critics of DEI will often suggest that the Left is attacking colorblindbess as an American principle. The idea is that liberals are pushing identity politics and creating an uneven competition for high demand spots, whether in companies or in universities, in sports, etc. Their claim is always that merit-based systems are the only fair way to administer access to jobs and education. However, we all know this was NEVER true. It was a myth, propaganda. Afterall, when the settlers began taking land, there was no merit in it, neither were their many requirements. Hundreds of acres of land were given away free or for minimal costs to any white settlers willing to go westward, willing to risk living on the frontier. But there was never any expectation that land-grabbers would ever contribute to greater society. Just possessing the land was enough, because it meant privatizing sections of seized territory. Much of this land was later deeded to churches and religious organizations as they were not required to report land that was donated, such as land left to the church in a will. All of that land that was grabbed was future wealth, setting a large portion of the white settlers on a path to always have more wealth, and therefore more say over the development of the country and its government. None of this was based on merit. Many of these in the west were people who came prepared to kill as many Indians as possible, same as buffalo and other fur trade. The bottom line is that, if the government can open land like that to the early settlers, theres no reason DEI policies, Affirmative Action, and reparations for Blacks, Native Americans and interred Japanese cant a priority. Similarly, the government has no problem subsidizing farming for struggling white farmers, but when it comes to everyone else, its a welfare dependency.