Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,201 posts)
Fri Apr 5, 2024, 03:21 PM Apr 5

Jack Smith done with Florida judge's gaming of case

By Harry Litman / For the Los Angeles Times

Jack Smith has had enough.

Late Monday, the special counsel responded to U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon’s bizarre recent order in the classified records case against Donald Trump, which asked the parties to propose jury instructions based on flagrantly wrong legal premises. Smith’s answer, in effect, was “I’m not playing.”

Rather than take on Cannon’s cockamamie assignment, Smith laid out accurate jury instructions based on the actual charges and law.

Cannon had ordered the parties to “engage with” the Trump team’s recurrent misinterpretation of the Presidential Records Act, which has no legal bearing on the case. Her order also depended on an account of the facts — namely, that Trump may have magically converted all the classified government records at issue into his personal property as he left the White House — that has always been beyond incredible.

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/comment-jack-smith-done-with-florida-judges-gaming-of-case/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jack Smith done with Florida judge's gaming of case (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 5 OP
If she isn't removed even if it forces her to rule on the issue and speed the trial MadameButterfly Apr 5 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author anciano Apr 5 #2

MadameButterfly

(1,062 posts)
1. If she isn't removed even if it forces her to rule on the issue and speed the trial
Fri Apr 5, 2024, 03:48 PM
Apr 5

along, she'll find other ways to control the outcome. Once jeapardy is an issue, there is no recourse. She's trying to delay all controversial rulings until then. It's so obvious, surely there's enough already to get her removed?

Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Jack Smith done with Flor...