Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,286 posts)
Thu Apr 11, 2024, 07:22 AM Apr 11

Jack Smith argues "not a single" Trump official has claimed he declared any records personal

So many times I have just thought this was an open and shut case against Trump but this Judge Cannon is a loose cannon and who knows what will happen!!




https://x.com/moonbreeze2/status/1778380618990051826

Jack Smith argues "not a single" Trump official has claimed he declared any records personal
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-jack-smith-special-counsel-jury-instructions-documents-case/



By Robert Legare

Updated on: April 3, 2024 / 9:17 AM EDT / CBS News

Washington — Special counsel Jack Smith urged a federal judge to keep a presidential recordkeeping law out of instructions that would be provided to the jury in the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump, according to court documents filed by Smith's team late Tuesday. Prosecutors warned that including the law in the instructions risked jeopardizing the proceedings, and signaled they would appeal the judge's decision if she ruled against them.

Last month, U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon, who is overseeing the case in Florida, asked Smith's and Trump's legal teams to file jury instructions based on two hypothetical scenarios: in one, the president has the authority under the Presidential Records Act (PRA) to categorize any records as personal. Under this scenario, Cannon wrote that "neither a court nor a jury" would have the ability to review the decision, a finding that could nullify much of the special counsel's case against Trump.

In the other, the jury would be able to examine a record that had been retained by a former president and make a finding that it was either "personal or presidential," under the PRA. Under this scenario, it is possible jurors could find that some official documents were mishandled.

Federal prosecutors rejected both proposals and wrote Tuesday that the PRA — a 1978 law that manages the maintenance of White House documents produced during each presidency — "should not play any role at trial at all," arguing that Trump's alleged mishandling of classified records occurred after his presidency ended................................



4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jack Smith argues "not a single" Trump official has claimed he declared any records personal (Original Post) riversedge Apr 11 OP
It has never been about evidence gab13by13 Apr 11 #1
Trump thinks that what Trump thinks is God's will and everyone should obey. bucolic_frolic Apr 11 #2
This is judicial activism at its worst. no_hypocrisy Apr 11 #3
What is way worse gab13by13 Apr 11 #4

gab13by13

(21,385 posts)
1. It has never been about evidence
Thu Apr 11, 2024, 07:25 AM
Apr 11

When the FBI executed its search warrant and found top secret documents it should have arrested Trump on the spot.

What good is a mountain of evidence if the prosecution never makes it to a courtroom?

bucolic_frolic

(43,258 posts)
2. Trump thinks that what Trump thinks is God's will and everyone should obey.
Thu Apr 11, 2024, 07:26 AM
Apr 11

It's an argument for Divine Right of Kings. We won a revolution about that, and have nicked many a dictator along the way and won several wars against such miscreants. Why we are visited with this in the modern age is beyond me.

no_hypocrisy

(46,160 posts)
3. This is judicial activism at its worst.
Thu Apr 11, 2024, 07:31 AM
Apr 11

Making law, not following law.

No precedent or anything in the verbiage of the Presidential Records Act that would allow a President to transfer highly classified documents to him/herself for personal possession.

gab13by13

(21,385 posts)
4. What is way worse
Thu Apr 11, 2024, 08:07 AM
Apr 11

is that our fascist Supreme Court took a case regarding whether a president can murder people and is deliberately sitting on ruling on it.

If ever there was a frivolous appeal this is picture book.

Putin's propaganda and influence is riddled through our country. The House will never bring aid for Ukraine up for a vote.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Jack Smith argues "not a ...