The Explosion of Asylum Claims Driving the Global Migrant Crisis - WSJ
(snip)
Campo de Asilo, or Asylum Camp. Run by an aid group, its a destination for migrants planning to turn themselves in to U.S. border agents and request asylum. That simple request is the main driver of record illegal immigration in much of the Western world. People travel thousands of miles, on foot and across seas, to turn up at the land borders of rich countries to ask for asylum, a form of legal protection for people who face persecution in their home country.
Its also become a key loophole for economic migrants, who arent under threat but want better working opportunities. Quirks in the law and an overwhelmed processing system nearly guarantee entry, at least for a time. The U.S. received more than 920,000 applications for asylum during its 2023 fiscal year, compared with just 76,000 in 2013. Since a single application can cover multiple members of a family, the figures underestimate the actual numbers of people seeking asylum.
(snip)
Part of the surge is caused by events including the war in Ukraine, the return of the Taliban in Afghanistan, Syrias civil strife and the brutal rule of authoritarian regimes in Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua. There is greater mobility nowadays, and sophisticated networks of smugglers are willing to move people across borders. And tips for using the asylum law now abound on social media.
The law in the U.S. typically gives migrants who have a reasonable claim of persecution the right to live and work in the country while their cases progress through the courts. So many are now coming that the U.S. lacks the capacity to quickly screen their cases, either at the border or in courts, where a typical asylum case now takes four years. Even if an application is ultimately rejected, migrants by then have put down roots, often had American children and are rarely deported because of the costs and logistical challenges. They are left in limbothey lose the right to work legally but arent kicked out.
(snip)
Its a global issue. Europe, which has even greater protections for would-be asylees than the U.S., received 1.14 million asylum seekers last year, the highest since 2016, when a wave of migrants sparked by Syrias civil war overwhelmed European borders. The issue has fed the rise of the far-right in countries across the continent. The U.K. spends the equivalent of $3.9 billion a year putting up asylum seekers in hotels while they wait for their cases to journey through overcrowded courts.
More..
https://archive.ph/5KSmi
Voltaire2
(13,123 posts)elena92
(9 posts)"Economic migrants" vs "true refugees" is divisive and inaccurate.
"Poor people" vs "people who face violence" are not a binary - in fact poor people are overwhelmingly more likely to face state violence.
question everything
(47,521 posts)From the article
International law began compelling governments to grant asylum to immigrants who suffered or had a well-founded fear of persecution in their home country in the late 1940s, after many nations had earlier refused to give shelter to Jews fleeing the Holocaust.
In 1980, the U.S. adopted the Refugee Act, which allowed entry of up to 50,000 refugees a year from all over the world. A refugee is typically someone who has been determined by a court or an expert to qualify for asylum.
=====
Yes, life is harsh in too many parts of the world that can shorten lifespan but this does not mean the gangs in Mexico and Venezuela where one's physical life is in danger.
And welcome to DU
Voltaire2
(13,123 posts)They exist because of our stupid corrupt war on some drugs. We created this problem. We also wrecked the local economies of many of our neighbors to the south. In addition climate refugees are another factor, and guess which nations created that problem?