Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

KelleyKramer

(9,011 posts) Wed Jan 10, 2018, 06:32 AM Jan 2018

The Rachel Maddow Show 01/09/18 MSNBC

The Rachel Maddow Show 01/09/18 MSNBC

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="

" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Rachel Maddow Show 01/09/18 MSNBC (Original Post) KelleyKramer Jan 2018 OP

Incomplete segment. nt longship Jan 2018 #1

It's 43 minutes long, what do you mean incomplete segment? KelleyKramer Jan 2018 #2

Try it yourself. longship Jan 2018 #3

No, the Schiff seg repeats KelleyKramer Jan 2018 #4

Interesting. longship Jan 2018 #5

longship

(40,416 posts)

1. Incomplete segment. nt

Reply to KelleyKramer (Original post)

Wed Jan 10, 2018, 07:44 AM

Jan 2018

KelleyKramer

(9,011 posts)

2. It's 43 minutes long, what do you mean incomplete segment?

Reply to longship (Reply #1)

Wed Jan 10, 2018, 08:20 AM

Jan 2018

longship

(40,416 posts)

3. Try it yourself.

Reply to KelleyKramer (Reply #2)

Wed Jan 10, 2018, 08:57 AM

Jan 2018

But it just the Schiff interview, cut off at the end.

Hope this helps.

KelleyKramer

(9,011 posts)

4. No, the Schiff seg repeats

Reply to longship (Reply #3)

Wed Jan 10, 2018, 09:09 AM

Jan 2018

The actual show is 43 minutes. This youtube clocks in at 46 minutes, it has the last 3 minute seg repeat (why? No idea)

You didn't miss anything, that is the entire show

longship

(40,416 posts)

5. Interesting.

Reply to KelleyKramer (Reply #4)

Wed Jan 10, 2018, 12:35 PM

Jan 2018

It cuts out during the Schiff segment for me.

I'll try again.

Thanks.

Reply to this discussion