The DU Lounge

sakabatou

(42,206 posts) Tue Jun 5, 2012, 02:29 AM Jun 2012

A bicycle built for Who (Pic)

Last edited Tue Jun 5, 2012, 03:09 AM - Edit history (2)

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A bicycle built for Who (Pic) (Original Post) sakabatou Jun 2012 OP

I was going to play grammar police until I noticed the TARDIS. HopeHoops Jun 2012 #1

Tell me what you were gonna say sakabatou Jun 2012 #2

"for whom" HopeHoops Jun 2012 #4

Gotcha sakabatou Jun 2012 #5

The TARDIS was a dead giveaway. HopeHoops Jun 2012 #6

The Grammar Dalek pokerfan Jun 2012 #7

ROFL! sakabatou Jun 2012 #8

very cool! /nt ceile Jun 2012 #3

Pete Townshend? Roger Daltrey? baldguy Jun 2012 #9

LOL sakabatou Jun 2012 #10

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)

1. I was going to play grammar police until I noticed the TARDIS.

Reply to sakabatou (Original post)

Tue Jun 5, 2012, 10:42 AM

Jun 2012

sakabatou

(42,206 posts)

2. Tell me what you were gonna say

Reply to HopeHoops (Reply #1)

Tue Jun 5, 2012, 02:25 PM

Jun 2012

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)

4. "for whom"

Reply to sakabatou (Reply #2)

Tue Jun 5, 2012, 04:28 PM

Jun 2012

It's obvious from the picture that "Who" was actually the intended word.

sakabatou

(42,206 posts)

5. Gotcha

Reply to HopeHoops (Reply #4)

Tue Jun 5, 2012, 06:09 PM

Jun 2012

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)

6. The TARDIS was a dead giveaway.

Reply to sakabatou (Reply #5)

Tue Jun 5, 2012, 06:40 PM

Jun 2012

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)

7. The Grammar Dalek

Reply to HopeHoops (Reply #6)

Tue Jun 5, 2012, 06:49 PM

Jun 2012

sakabatou

(42,206 posts)

8. ROFL!

Reply to pokerfan (Reply #7)

Tue Jun 5, 2012, 06:58 PM

Jun 2012

ceile

(8,692 posts)

3. very cool! /nt

Reply to sakabatou (Original post)

Tue Jun 5, 2012, 03:37 PM

Jun 2012

baldguy

(36,649 posts)

9. Pete Townshend? Roger Daltrey?

Reply to sakabatou (Original post)

Tue Jun 5, 2012, 08:26 PM

Jun 2012

Keith Moon?

sakabatou

(42,206 posts)

10. LOL

Reply to baldguy (Reply #9)

Tue Jun 5, 2012, 08:35 PM

Jun 2012

Reply to this discussion