Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 11:17 AM Feb 2012

Sir Paul McCartney Gives Up Smoking Pot At Age 69

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/16/sir-paul-mccartney-gives-up-smoking-pot_n_1281622.html

Sir Paul McCartney Gives Up Smoking Pot At Age 69ir Paul McCartney may have looked younger than ever during his Grammy performance Sunday, but the former Beatles member says he's finally giving up a large part of his youth: marijuana.

In a new interview with Rolling Stone magazine, McCartney reveals that Bob Dylan first introduced him to cannabis -- and that he also experimented with a host of others, including heroin, LSD and cocaine. He has unashamedly stuck with the weed-smoking habit since the 1960s, and was famously arrested in Japan in 1980 for possessing pot.

Now the 69-year-old music legend, who finally received his star on Hollywood's Walk of Fame on February 9, says it's time to give up this part of his life -- for his 8-year-old daughter Beatrice (from second wife Heather Mills).

“I smoked my share. When you’re bringing up a youngster, your sense of responsibility does kick in, if you’re lucky, at some point... Enough’s enough -- you just don’t seem to think it’s necessary," he said


Really?

I mean you smoked it around the other 4 kids you had so why quit now? I'm assuming his sense of responsibility went out the door for those first 4 kids he raised.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sir Paul McCartney Gives Up Smoking Pot At Age 69 (Original Post) LynneSin Feb 2012 OP
I'm guessing... Chan790 Feb 2012 #1
Same difference. Bake Feb 2012 #2
No, merely commentating upon causation. Chan790 Feb 2012 #3
Quitter... Glassunion Feb 2012 #4
I'm thinking his dealer got busted and he can't find another connection. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #5
Okay, I'll bite. Doc Holliday Feb 2012 #6
 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
1. I'm guessing...
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 11:24 AM
Feb 2012

this has more to do with Heather Mills than his kid. The divorce was brutal from what I read and there's enough animosity there still I'd wager that his pot habit might be used as a blunt object to fight him on any impending or future custodial/visitation issues.

So, you're not really quitting pot for the kid, you're quitting pot for the sake of your relationship to the kid.

Bake

(21,977 posts)
2. Same difference.
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 11:45 AM
Feb 2012

So now we're bashing Sir Paul for making a free choice to do, or not do, pot?

I'm shocked, I tell you, shocked.



Bake

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
3. No, merely commentating upon causation.
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 12:03 PM
Feb 2012

I assert there is a difference between quitting pot because you don't want to smoke pot anymore and quitting pot because you're concerned that your ex-wife is going to use it as an excuse to prevent you from seeing your kid. the motivations might overlap but are differentiated.

I'm not bashing him at all...if I were in his shoes, I'd probably do the same thing.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Sir Paul McCartney Gives ...