Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Pennsylvania
Related: About this forumRecent LTTE by Rep. Critz, defending the frackers and the DEP:
Stick to fracking science, not the politicsBy Mark S. Critz
Published: Saturday, June 23, 2012, 2:38 p.m.
At a recent U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson justified the agencys desire to do additional science around hydraulic fracturing ... because the publics trust in that technology we believe is also based on the belief that we are looking to bring the very best science to bear, to ensure that it remains safe. While no one would argue with the importance of ensuring safety in responsible shale-gas development, recent missteps and questionable actions by the EPA have regrettably cast doubt upon the agencys credibility and ability to put forth the best science to ensure the publics trust.
In addition to last months embarrassing resignation of the EPAs Region 6 administrator for subjectively placing a bulls-eye on the oil and gas industry, the EPA also has shown an anti-gas bias in Pennsylvania with its attempts to torpedo the proposed MARC 1 Pipeline after the project gained approval from the federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
As a result, there is mounting concern that EPA officials are committed to political agendas instead of looking out for the overall best interests of the public.
>snip<
*With the huge strides made by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) over the last few generations, there are clear indications that Pennsylvanias hydraulic fracturing regulations are working. And while the EPA has an important role as partners with the state, the agency should avoid stepping into an area that the DEP has a long history of overseeing.
More at link: http://triblive.com/opinion/2055478-74/epa-fracturing-hydraulic-public-science-agency-gas-pennsylvania-based-concern?printerfriendly=true
* I added the BOLD. This POS has the gall to defend the PA DEP while everyone "knows" that Gov. Gashole exempted the drillers from environmental regulations.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1911 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Recent LTTE by Rep. Critz, defending the frackers and the DEP: (Original Post)
femmocrat
Jun 2012
OP
blue neen
(12,336 posts)1. OMG.
There are not enough words. Who the heck are we supposed to vote for?
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)2. I know. This guy sounds like a tool.
Even worse, I'm in Tim Murphy's district! I think we are screwn.
blue neen
(12,336 posts)3. Scaife's monopoly of the newspapers and the TV stations has made it's impact.
It's sickening to think of how much money he has used just for hatred.
In this area, for these candidates to have any chance at all, they have to run to the right of Atilla the Hun.
I do not like it, but that's the way it is. Yuk.