Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

modrepub

(3,496 posts)
Sun Apr 7, 2024, 12:25 PM Apr 7

Water privatization is coming under renewed scrutiny from Pa. lawmakers and regulators

The biggest for-profit water utility in Pennsylvania announced in November that it planned to collect an additional $204 million from customers — less than a year after the company’s last rate hike.

It may have been a major strategic error.

Over the next couple months, public hearings held by the state’s utility regulator were packed with frustrated ratepayers whose complaints were echoed by politicians — notwithstanding Pennsylvania American Water’s assurances that the revenue would help fund $1 billion in upgrades to water and sewer plants and other infrastructure. An investment analyst who follows utilities later wrote that he’d been attending such rate case hearings for years and had “never seen anything like those we attended in recent days.”

For-profit utilities in Pennsylvania have scooped up more than 20 water and sewer systems from municipal governments during the last eight years, spurred by a state law that changed how such assets are valued. Municipalities have used sale proceeds to pay off debt, invest in capital projects, and avoid tax increases.

[link:https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/water-privatization-is-coming-under-renewed-scrutiny-from-pa-lawmakers-and-regulators-as-consumers-sour-on-rate-increases/ar-BB1lcZzL?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=41ac8df1e17b4f0e9d89122c6629b83b&ei=30|

Long article and a lot going on. While most will lament the purchase of public utilities by private companies, there's a lot of very old infrastructure out there that is due for replacing. Private companies were supposed to help in this endeavor since they would have the capital and experience that may have been lacking in the public sector. Not working out, probably because most public systems were shored up with other unrelated tax revenue streams. Thus the operation was not reflecting the true costs.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Water privatization is coming under renewed scrutiny from Pa. lawmakers and regulators (Original Post) modrepub Apr 7 OP
One of the stupidest neoliberal initiatives is the privatization of public infrastructure. Voltaire2 Apr 7 #1
Neoliberal? Maybe they call themselves that FakeNoose Apr 8 #2
The neoliberal position differs from the libertarian position on the role of government Voltaire2 Apr 8 #3

Voltaire2

(13,079 posts)
1. One of the stupidest neoliberal initiatives is the privatization of public infrastructure.
Sun Apr 7, 2024, 01:07 PM
Apr 7

Someday somebody might just figure out that extracting rent from a system doesn't make it more efficient or provide better service or reduce the cost. It does the opposite: less efficient, worse service, higher costs. What it does do is funnel huge streams of money into the pockets of wealthy investors.

FakeNoose

(32,658 posts)
2. Neoliberal? Maybe they call themselves that
Mon Apr 8, 2024, 04:02 PM
Apr 8

... but really it's a libertarian concept through and through.

"Anything I can make a buck from is entirely legal, and don't you DARE try to tax me!"

Voltaire2

(13,079 posts)
3. The neoliberal position differs from the libertarian position on the role of government
Mon Apr 8, 2024, 05:42 PM
Apr 8

in primarily social and geopolitical issues. They both reject all public enterprise.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»Water privatization is co...