Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Wisconsin
Related: About this forumThe Cap Times: John Doe ruling dangerous for democracy
The bought-and-paid-for conservatives on the Wisconsin Supreme Court surprised no one today with their decision to call a halt to the John Doe investigation into alleged illegal campaign collusion between Gov. Scott Walker and corporate America's dark-money groups.
But that doesn't make the court's decision any less onerous or, in the words of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign's Matt Rothschild, any less dangerous.
What the decision effectively does is to allow political candidates to bypass state law on contribution limits by steering big contributors to supposedly outside groups, where there are no donation limits. That money, thanks to today's ruling, then can be coordinated with the politician's campaign. That's been illegal in Wisconsin until now. The court, it seems, doesn't believe that voters have the right to know the source of money that is financing political campaigns.
The four conservative justices who joined in the ruling Michael Gableman, David Prosser, Patience Roggensack and Annette Ziegler have been beneficiaries of at least $10 million in campaign spending by the same parties that the Milwaukee County John Doe was investigating.
But that doesn't make the court's decision any less onerous or, in the words of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign's Matt Rothschild, any less dangerous.
What the decision effectively does is to allow political candidates to bypass state law on contribution limits by steering big contributors to supposedly outside groups, where there are no donation limits. That money, thanks to today's ruling, then can be coordinated with the politician's campaign. That's been illegal in Wisconsin until now. The court, it seems, doesn't believe that voters have the right to know the source of money that is financing political campaigns.
The four conservative justices who joined in the ruling Michael Gableman, David Prosser, Patience Roggensack and Annette Ziegler have been beneficiaries of at least $10 million in campaign spending by the same parties that the Milwaukee County John Doe was investigating.
Continue reading...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1337 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Cap Times: John Doe ruling dangerous for democracy (Original Post)
WIProgressive88
Jul 2015
OP
Warpy
(111,464 posts)1. It's clear obstruction of justice
by Republicans trying to shield one of their own.
There sill eventually be fallout from this one.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)2. I have ZERO confidence in the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
These four are not conservatives. They are rather more like sociopath pawns of the corporate right who have been given the keys to an entire branch of state government.
Zero confidence. The Wisconsin Supreme court has become a (very unfunny) joke.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)3. It would be difficult to overstate how corrupt the right-wing majority on our Supreme Court is.