Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

girl gone mad

(20,634 posts)
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 01:46 AM Feb 2012

US taxpayers to subsidise $40bn housing settlement

Banks get bailed out, we get sold out: deja vu all over again edition. From the Financial Times:

US taxpayers are expected to subsidise the $40bn settlement owed by five leading banks over allegations that they systematically abused borrowers in pursuit of improper home seizures, the Financial Times has learnt.

The deal, agreed last week, calls for Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Ally Financial to pay about $5bn in cash fines and to reduce monthly payments and loan balances for distressed US borrowers by as much as about $35bn.

However, a clause in the provisional agreement – which has not been made public – allows the banks to count future loan modifications made under a 2009 foreclosure-prevention initiative towards their restructuring obligations for the new settlement, according to people familiar with the matter. The existing $30bn initiative, the Home Affordable Modification Programme (Hamp), provides taxpayer funds as an incentive to banks, third party investors and troubled borrowers to arrange loan modifications.

Neil Barofsky, a Democrat and the former special inspector-general of the troubled asset relief programme, described this clause as “scandalous”.

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/29834f52-582b-11e1-bf61-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1mZtdETrW
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US taxpayers to subsidise $40bn housing settlement (Original Post) girl gone mad Feb 2012 OP
I agree it is scandalous. nt Mojorabbit Feb 2012 #1
Let's remember to ''keep looking forward'' now...... DeSwiss Feb 2012 #2
Giddy up tax donkeys! phasma ex machina Feb 2012 #3
Even better than the BP "settlement" that gave half the money back to BP. CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #4
A nice cut for BoA'holes Po_d Mainiac Feb 2012 #5
To open FT pieces without registering Po_d Mainiac Feb 2012 #6
Very suspect. HAMP was dead anyway. Any new spending would need Congress. banned from Kos Feb 2012 #7
Arrrggghhh dixiegrrrrl Feb 2012 #8
 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
2. Let's remember to ''keep looking forward'' now......
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 02:04 AM
Feb 2012

...cause looking backards' can strain yer neck.


- And I won't even mention what ''looking backards'' can do to campaign donations........

K&R

 

CAPHAVOC

(1,138 posts)
4. Even better than the BP "settlement" that gave half the money back to BP.
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 03:50 AM
Feb 2012

This is getting bad. And now I see they are throwing the unemployed under the Bus.

Po_d Mainiac

(4,183 posts)
5. A nice cut for BoA'holes
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 09:15 AM
Feb 2012

BofA, for instance, will be able to use future modifications made under Hamp towards the $7.6bn in borrower assistance it is committed to provide under the settlement. Under Hamp, the bank will receive payments for averting borrower default and reimbursement from taxpayers for principal written down.
 

banned from Kos

(4,017 posts)
7. Very suspect. HAMP was dead anyway. Any new spending would need Congress.
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 03:38 PM
Feb 2012

Resurrecting HAMP would not be a bad idea if there were enforcement this time.

But FT is a great source.

Will withhold judgement until the contract is released.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»US taxpayers to subsidise...