Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumChina hopes to build a $50 trillion global wind and solar power grid by 2050
"One thing you can't fault China for, lack of ambition. By 2050, the country hopes to lead efforts to build a $50 trillion global wind and solar power grid that would completely change how the world is powered.
The Global Energy Interconnection (GEI) project was first introduced by the State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC) last year. Liu Zhenya, the SGCC chairman, expounded on the project during a visit earlier this month to Switzerland to meet with the heads of the ABB Group and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
According to the World Economic Forum, the project won't just be about connecting countries' energy grids, but actually generating enough power to run the world. China hopes to connect wind farms in the Arctic Circle with solar farms located on the Equator, in a system that will transcend national boundaries and provide clean energy everywhere..."
More at link.
femmedem
(8,213 posts)and say whether this seems plausible.
bananas
(27,509 posts)edit to add some links:
http://www.geni.org/
http://bfi.org/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckminster_Fuller
femmedem
(8,213 posts)NNadir
(33,594 posts)It's been useless against climate change, which is now accelerating at the fastest rate ever observed.
China controls the majority of the world's supply of lanthanide elements, but even China doesn't have enough of them to make the so called "renewable energy" scheme work, because it's not, in fact, renewable, as it relies on mining vast quantities of rare and fairly toxic materials.
The so called "renewable energy" industry hasn't worked; it isn't working; and it won't work. The reason is the low energy to mass ratio that wind and solar plants have; and the need to store energy, which is a thermodynamic, and thus economic and environmental waste.
2015, after half a century Sisyphean effort to squander money on so called "renewable energy" was the worst year ever observed for the accumulation of the dangerous fossil fuel waste carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and 2016 thus far is on track to blow that 3.05 ppm per year figure away completely.
The reason that this will happen is the unending capacity people have to lie to themselves.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)NickB79
(19,301 posts)CO2 emissions totaled between 35 and 40 billion tons in 2015, according to several agencies. Some of that is absorbed by forests and oceans, but those natural systems are being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of new CO2. As a result, the inventory shows, the average global concentration increased to 399 parts per million in 2015, a record jump of almost 3 ppm from the year before.
Methane levels jumped 11 parts per billion from 2014 to 2015, nearly double the rate they were increasing from 2007 to 2013. Methane, and other greenhouse gases like nitrous oxide and tropospheric ozone, are measured in parts per billion because the concentrations are lower.
"This inventory shows the rate of releases are increasing. It's going completely in the wrong direction, with no sign that the planet as a whole has the problem under control," said Kevin Trenberth, a senior scientist in the climate analysis section at the National Center for Atmospheric Research who wasn't involved in compiling the inventory.
Also: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1127100435
One of the things I really wanted to do when I retired from Sepa was find out if you could detect this decline in the ability of the earth to soak up carbon dioxide. And sure enough, it turns out you can, he said.
By doing this study in 2016, when the peak occurred about ten years ago, I found there is just enough data to show that its very likely there has been a peak in the earths ability to soak up carbon dioxide and now its in decline.
The scale of this reduction in capacity can be equated to adding another emitter on the scale of China into the global inventory, he says.
We're gonna need a lot more panels and turbines........
kristopher
(29,798 posts)It doesn't. The falsehoods and misrepresentations denigrating renewables are in service to the profits of an industry threatened with extinction by the data in those charts.