Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,602 posts)
Mon Sep 11, 2017, 08:33 AM Sep 2017

The Wet-Bulb Bottleneck; No, We Won't "Adapt", And Neither Will Lot Of Other Life Forms

EDIT

And it doesn’t get any better after 2050. But forecasts about the disintegration of society are social and political speculations and have nothing to do with mass extinctions. Huber is more interested in the hard limits of biology. He wants to know when humans themselves will actually start to disintegrate. His 2010 paper on the subject was inspired by a chance meeting with a colleague.

“I presented a paper at a conference about how hot tropical temperatures were in the geological past and [University of New South Wales climate scientist] Steve Sherwood was in the audience. He heard my talk and he started asking himself the very basic question: ‘How hot and humid can it get before things start dying?’ It was literally just an order of magnitude kind of question. I guess he thought about it and realised that he didn’t know the answer and wasn’t sure anyone else did either… Our paper really wasn’t motivated by the future climate per se, because when we started we didn’t know if there was any kind of realistic future climate state that would fall within this habitability limit. When we started, it was just like, ‘We don’t know. Maybe you have to go to, like, 50C global mean temperature.’ Then we ran a whole set of model results and it was rather alarming to us.”

Sherwood and Huber calculated their temperature thresholds using the so-called wet-bulb temperature, which basically measures how much you can cool off at a given temperature. If humidity is high, for instance, things like sweat and wind are less effective at cooling you down and the wet-bulb temperature accounts for this. “If you take a meteorology class, the wet-bulb temperature is calculated by basically taking a glass thermometer, putting it in a tight wet sock and swinging it around your head,” he said. “So when you assume that this temperature limit applies to a human, you’re really kind of imagining a gale force wind, blowing on a naked human being, who’s doused in water, and there’s no sunlight, and they’re immobile and actually not doing anything other than basal metabolism.”

Today, the most common maximums for wet-bulb temperatures around the world are 26C to 27C. Wet-bulb temperatures of 35C or higher are lethal to humanity. Above this limit, it is impossible for humans to dissipate the heat they generate indefinitely and they die of overheating in a matter of hours, no matter how hard they try to cool off. “So we were trying to get across the point that physiology and adaptation and these other things will have nothing to do with this limit. It’s the easy-bake oven limit,” he said. “You cook yourself, very slowly.” What that means is that this limit is likely far too generous for human survivability.

EDIT

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/09/this-is-how-your-world-could-end-climate-change-global-warming

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Wet-Bulb Bottleneck; No, We Won't "Adapt", And Neither Will Lot Of Other Life Forms (Original Post) hatrack Sep 2017 OP
psssst ... "wet" bulb. nt eppur_se_muova Sep 2017 #1
+1 DetlefK Sep 2017 #2
Thanks! More Coffee! hatrack Sep 2017 #3
What the world maximum wet bulb temps would look like with 10C warming muriel_volestrangler Sep 2017 #4
This is good on temperature, but there are other factors trying to kill us. mackdaddy Sep 2017 #5
I half-joked around a decade ago that I'd be growing palm trees in Minnesota before I died NickB79 Sep 2017 #6

mackdaddy

(1,530 posts)
5. This is good on temperature, but there are other factors trying to kill us.
Mon Sep 11, 2017, 01:40 PM
Sep 2017

This is an interesting article, but it mostly just concentrates on the environmental temperature and humidity that people can exist.

An important point was that wet bulb temperatures are the measured with a thermometer bulb in literally a wet sock as swung through the air. And that people are not wet socks, but working moving beings, internally generating heat, not in a constant wind.

But in addition to this it does not discuss much about the loss of the total HABITAT for humans. The total environment, water, temperature extremes, rain/drought, insects/diseases, fires, and the ability to grow and store FOOD.
This story also still lengthens out the time frame of climate change to decades. Very few even mention the possibility of an abrupt warming from the Arctic melting.

NickB79

(19,298 posts)
6. I half-joked around a decade ago that I'd be growing palm trees in Minnesota before I died
Mon Sep 11, 2017, 03:38 PM
Sep 2017

I'm 37; my family typically lives into their 90's, so I figure I have until 2060 or so.

I'll be growing fucking palm trees on my land. It's no joke now.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The Wet-Bulb Bottleneck; ...