Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
Fri Feb 15, 2019, 08:28 PM Feb 2019

Pinnacle Engines Develops Efficient, Low-Emission Gasoline Engine Using Supercomputing

Last edited Fri Feb 15, 2019, 09:01 PM - Edit history (1)

https://science.energy.gov/ascr/highlights/2019/ascr-2019-02-a/
02.12.19
Pinnacle Engines Develops Efficient, Low-Emission Gasoline Engine Using Supercomputing

Researchers modeled design concepts for innovative, opposed-piston engine on Titan supercomputer.

The Science

A more efficient car engine? That’s the goal. An opposed-piston engine is more efficient than a traditional internal combustion engine. Pinnacle Engines is developing a multi-cylinder gasoline engine for automotive use. The team enhanced the engine’s reciprocating sleeve-valve system, thanks to a Department of Energy supercomputer. The result? An engine with better combustion and reduced pollutant emissions.

The Impact

In an opposed-piston engine, the mechanics and thermodynamics involved are complex. Changing the design offers unique challenges. Through access to the Titan supercomputer at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, Pinnacle Engines discovered a design concept that met its technical goals. Now, Pinnacle Engines is building a prototype engine for testing.

Summary

For over a decade, California-based small business Pinnacle Engines has developed opposed-piston engines for a range of small, single-cylinder applications such as motorcycle and industrial generator engines. To overcome some of the mechanical and thermodynamic challenges of developing an opposed-piston engine for passenger cars that meets efficiency and emissions goals, Pinnacle Engines researchers used the Titan supercomputer and Eos cluster at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility to optimize the company’s engine model. To prepare its code for Titan’s large-scale architecture and improve analysis of scientific results, the team also worked with researchers at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory National Transportation Research Center.

On Titan, the team completed computational fluid dynamics simulations for a multi-cylinder engine eight times faster than was possible on Pinnacle Engine’s in-house computing resources. The detailed Titan simulations revealed the importance of combining a swirling and tumbling motion of gas during combustion, known as a “swumble” mode. Ultimately, Pinnacle Engines discovered a design concept that met its technical goals: a four-stroke, opposed-piston, sleeve-valve engine with variable valve timing and compression ratio and a swumble mode of combustion. The team modeled the combustion system over typical operating conditions and determined the design could successfully meet emissions and fuel-economy standards. Pinnacle Engines is now building a prototype engine for testing.



https://www.olcf.ornl.gov/2018/12/03/pinnacle-engines-develops-efficient-low-emission-gasoline-engine-using-supercomputing/

http://vimeo.com/304393904

https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4039845
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pinnacle Engines Develops Efficient, Low-Emission Gasoline Engine Using Supercomputing (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe Feb 2019 OP
Until electric takes over, every bit of this type of innovation helps kysrsoze Feb 2019 #1
It still puts emissions into the air. All that time and effort... brush Feb 2019 #2
Steam!? OKIsItJustMe Feb 2019 #3
Stanley Steamers from the early 20th Cen. were... brush Feb 2019 #4
Stanley Steamers burned gasoline OKIsItJustMe Feb 2019 #5
"Development"...there's more than one way to heat water. brush Feb 2019 #6
Sure... OKIsItJustMe Feb 2019 #7
The OP is about a new gas engine, the last thing we... brush Feb 2019 #8
But, while the OP presents a more efficient use of combustion, a steam engine is less efficient. OKIsItJustMe Feb 2019 #9
Argue with yourself. I'm not interested. brush Feb 2019 #10
Have a nice day! OKIsItJustMe Feb 2019 #11

kysrsoze

(6,025 posts)
1. Until electric takes over, every bit of this type of innovation helps
Fri Feb 15, 2019, 08:49 PM
Feb 2019

Mazda has also engineered a gas engine which gets mileage comparable to a diesel. They've done some really cool stuff.

brush

(53,978 posts)
2. It still puts emissions into the air. All that time and effort...
Fri Feb 15, 2019, 09:03 PM
Feb 2019

could've gone to steam or electric engine development.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
3. Steam!?
Fri Feb 15, 2019, 09:21 PM
Feb 2019

Are there large steam engines which don't involve burning stuff to make steam?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_engine#Heat_source

The heat required for boiling the water and raising the temperature of the steam can be derived from various sources, most commonly from burning combustible materials with an appropriate supply of air in a closed space (called variously combustion chamber, firebox, furnace). In the case of model or toy steam engines, the heat source can be an electric heating element.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_engine#Efficiency
In practice, a reciprocating steam engine cycle exhausting the steam to atmosphere will typically have an efficiency (including the boiler) in the range of 1–10%, but with the addition of a condenser, Corliss valves, multiple expansion, and high steam pressure / temperature, it may be greatly improved, historically into the regime of 10–20%, and very rarely slightly higher.

brush

(53,978 posts)
4. Stanley Steamers from the early 20th Cen. were...
Fri Feb 15, 2019, 09:48 PM
Feb 2019

gasoline competitors. I did mention the words development.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
5. Stanley Steamers burned gasoline
Fri Feb 15, 2019, 10:15 PM
Feb 2019
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Motor_Carriage_Company#Specifications_and_design
Early Stanley cars had light wooden bodies mounted on tubular steel frames by means of full-elliptic springs. Steam was generated in a vertical fire-tube boiler, mounted beneath the seat, with a vaporizing gasoline (later, kerosene) burner underneath. The boiler was reinforced by several layers of piano wire wound around it, which gave it a strong but relatively light-weight shell. In early models, the vertical fire-tubes were made of copper, and were expanded into holes in the upper and lower crown sheets. In later models, the installation of a condenser caused oil-fouling in the expansion joints, and welded steel fire-tubes had to be used. The boilers were reasonably safe, since they were fitted with safety valves. Even if these failed, any dangerous over pressure would rupture one of the joints long before the boiler shell itself could burst. The resulting leakage would relieve the boiler pressure and douse the burner, with very little risk to the passenger. There is not a single documented incident of a Stanley boiler exploding.




Gasoline burner for a Stanley steam car boiler

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
7. Sure...
Fri Feb 15, 2019, 10:23 PM
Feb 2019

There were a number of reasons why internal combustion engines beat out steam.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Motor_Carriage_Company#Obsolescence

During the mid to late 1910s, the fuel efficiency and power delivery of internal combustion engines improved dramatically and using an electric starter instead of the crank, which had been notorious for injuring its operators, led to the rise of the gasoline-powered automobile, which also was much cheaper. The Stanley company produced a series of advertising campaigns trying to recover the car-buying public away from the "internal explosion engine," but it was unsuccessful. Their advertising slogan was, "Power – Correctly Generated, Correctly Controlled, Correctly Applied to the Rear Axle." These were early examples of the fear, uncertainty and doubt advertising campaign, since their aim was not to convince buyers of the advantages of the Stanley Steamer but to suggest that internal combustion automobiles could explode.

brush

(53,978 posts)
8. The OP is about a new gas engine, the last thing we...
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 01:08 AM
Feb 2019

we need to help th environment. I'm not here to argue with you about steam v gasoline engines. Just as there are hybrids of gas and electric, there cold be a hybrid of electric and steam but neither of us are automotive engineers so I'll leave that to them.

But again, when alternative energy is of utmost importance, I'm not excited about a new gasoline engine contributing more emmsions to our air, which was my oint all along.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
9. But, while the OP presents a more efficient use of combustion, a steam engine is less efficient.
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 10:11 AM
Feb 2019

The primary advantage of a steam engine is that it is potentially more flexible in its use of fuel, since it is an external combustion engine.

If you prefer external combustion for some reason, rather than steam engines, I like Stirling engines. Stirling engines are also used as an efficient way to convert concentrated solar power (heat) mechanical energy to electrical energy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_thermal_energy#Dish_designs

However, for use in an automobile, I'm afraid an internal combustion engine is more practical.

I would love to be able to snap my fingers and change our entire energy infrastructure tomorrow, but we both know that's not going to happen. We will continue to use combustion engines to power our technology for a while at least. This is a potentially cleaner and more efficient way to do that.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Pinnacle Engines Develops...