BAS - Why Is Blackrock (Ostensibly) Going Green? Returns On Energy Stocks Might Show Real Reason
On Tuesday, January 14, the New York Times ran a story in its Dealbook business section that contained some startling news. Larry Fink, the founder and chief executive officer of the worlds largest asset manager, BlackRock, announced that his firm would fundamentally shift its investing policy to focus on climate change. The idea is for BlackRocka firm overseeing $7 trillion in investmentsto get out of coal and other fossil fuels, which he called a high sustainability-related risk. In fact, said the Times, His [Finks] intent is to encourage every company, not just energy firms, to rethink their carbon footprints.
EDIT
Of course, there could be a a touch of greenwashing hereechoing an earlier observation made by billionaire British hedge fund activist Christopher Hohn, who called the firms previous climate efforts appalling and full of greenwash, according to the Financial Times. Environmental organizations such as Ceres said that BlackRock has some of the worst records when it comes to issues dealing with climate change. Similarly, data collected by ProxyInsight found that BlackRock opposed more than 80 percent of climate change-related motions at fossil fuel companies between 2015 and 2019, The Guardian said.
And Fink made it a point to emphasize that while he intends for BlackRock to consider climate risks, he was not pursuing a complete, across-the-board sale of energy companies that produce fossil fuels. Because of its sheer size, BlackRock would likely remain one of the worlds largest investors in fossil-fuel companies. (The company holds a 6.7 percent stake in Exxon Mobil, 6.9 percent in Chevron, and 6 percent in the mining company Glencore, CNBC reports.)
Still, Finks move to transition clients away fossil fuel and toward renewables could put the pressure on some other large financial firms in the United States to make similar movesincluding such financial behemoths as JPMorgan Chase, Vanguard, and T. Rowe Price. Ironically, if Fink had pulled BlackRock funds out of fossil fuels a decade ago, his clients would have been well-served, the Times noted. The energy sector gained only two percent in that time frame, while the broader S&P 500 nearly tripledshowing that there can be serious money to be made by getting out of companies that contribute to climate change.
Ed. - Or that you can financially benefit not only by getting out of a shitty asset class, but by claiming it's for bright green reasons (emphasis added).
EDIT/END
https://thebulletin.org/2020/01/climate-finance-is-blackrock-going-green-or-greenwashing/