Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Think. Again.

(9,370 posts)
Wed Aug 2, 2023, 04:01 PM Aug 2023

California sees success tying energy efficiency rebates to real results

By: Jeff St. John, August 1 2023
Full article: https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/energy-efficiency/california-sees-success-tying-energy-efficiency-rebates-to-real-results

I believe our nationwide, federal effort to stop CO2 emissions could and should be as aggressive as California is being.

The state is revamping how it calculates energy efficiency incentives. The goal? Base payments on real-world benefits for customers and the grid — not estimates.

For the past few years, California has been trying out a new way to do energy efficiency. Rather than measuring the value of efficiency investments based on estimates — the dominant method throughout the U.S. — the new approach uses real-world data to pay providers based on how useful their projects are to the power grid.

Now data from some of these efforts is coming in — and the results look promising.

-snip-

Study after study has shown that energy-efficiency improvements are vital to reducing carbon emissions. The International Energy Agency dubs efficiency the ​“first fuel” for the clean-energy transition due to its cost-effectiveness compared to increasing the supply of clean power, with the added benefits of reducing utility bills and improving resiliency in the face of energy disruptions.

But the potential for efficiency to cut carbon emissions and ease grid strains is far larger than the funding now available https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/energy-efficiency/from-home-improvement-to-securitization-the-virtuous-cycle-to-supercharge-residential-energy-efficiency, industry experts say. Energy-efficiency programs, which are mainly funded by utilities and governments, have suffered from a combination of underinvestment and overly critical scrutiny of their cost-effectiveness. Reorienting incentives around outcomes rather than projections could be key to getting more return on every efficiency dollar — and potentially drawing more capital into a field that’s struggled to attract it.

Now, California regulators are requiring the state’s three big utilities Pacific Gas & Electric, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric to incorporate this measured pay-for-performance approach. That requirement applies to the programs that are slated to direct nearly $9 billion in efficiency portfolio spending through 2031. https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/news-and-updates/all-news/cpuc-adopts-milestone-investment-in-energy-efficiency-2023 Pay-for-performance has actually been an official goal of California efficiency policy since a 2015 law made it so — but the complexities of the industry have held back implementation until recently.

-snip-


Full article: https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/energy-efficiency/california-sees-success-tying-energy-efficiency-rebates-to-real-results
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California sees success tying energy efficiency rebates to real results (Original Post) Think. Again. Aug 2023 OP
The carrot works, orthoclad Aug 2023 #1
When does "the stick" include no more subsidies? Caribbeans Aug 2023 #2
YES!!! Think. Again. Aug 2023 #3
Iran had a secular democracy. orthoclad Aug 2023 #4

Caribbeans

(790 posts)
2. When does "the stick" include no more subsidies?
Wed Aug 2, 2023, 04:46 PM
Aug 2023
Fossil Fuels Received $5.9 Trillion In Subsidies in 2020, Report Finds

Yale E360 DIGEST | OCTOBER 6, 2021

Coal, oil, and natural gas received $5.9 trillion in subsidies in 2020 — or roughly $11 million every minute — according to a new analysis from the International Monetary Fund...
https://e360.yale.edu/digest/fossil-fuels-received-5-9-trillion-in-subsidies-in-2020-report-finds

In the time it took to post this (4 minutes), according to Yale.Edu, another 44 million dollars was literally given to the fossil fuel industry.

At what point does this end?

Before "sticks" are used?

It's the DisUnited States when it comes to energy. Has been since the Petro-Dollar was established by Henry and Dickie.

The Guardian won't talk about that though. Also won't talk much about the time the US and the UK pulled a "Regime Change" in Iran in 1953- the beginning of the policy that is still used today.

orthoclad

(2,910 posts)
4. Iran had a secular democracy.
Wed Aug 2, 2023, 05:39 PM
Aug 2023

Too friendly with the USSR. BP and the US wanted the oil.

Afghanistan had a secular government. With women's rights. Too friendly with the USSR. We had to get even for losing in Vietnam, so we armed the mullahs, eventually leading to 9/11 and the Taliban.

Over and over, going way back. When General Butler wrote "War Is A Racket", 1935, he was enraged at war profits at the cost of soldiers' lives. Butler served in Haiti, Central America, the Philippines, Mexico, and China (yes, US troops invaded China). He earned TWO Congressional Medals Of Honor.
pdf here:
https://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/warisaracket.pdf

Actually, the Guardian did write quite a bit about the 1953 coup in Iran.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/17/british-spys-account-sheds-light-on-role-in-1953-iranian-coup
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/19/cia-admits-role-1953-iranian-coup
and more.

This is why I use the word OILigarchs.

Yes, stop the subsidies. We the public subsidize their extraction, then we the public pay to clean up the mess.

And charge some executives with murder, for knowingly condemning thousands, so far, to death by climate change.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»California sees success t...