Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumFederal Court Vacates Forest Service Decision and Halts Massive Yellowstone Ecosystem Logging Projec
Its absolutely one of the worst places in the country for clearcuts. So were thrilled that the Court agreed with us and halted the logging project. But going even further, the Courts Order vacated the Forest Services approval of this logging and road-building project that would have clearcut federally-designated lynx Critical Habitat in the Beartooth Mountains, which are part of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem just west of Red Lodge, Montana and north of Yellowstone National Park.
We first sued to stop the Greater Red Lodge logging project in July 2015 and the Forest Service withdrew the decision authorizing the logging in November 2016 after a federal district court granted our request for an injunction. The Court found the Forest Service had violated the law by not consulting with the Fish and Wildlife Service on the potential impacts to federally-designated lynx Critical Habitat. But then the Forest Service plowed on and signed a new decision, so we challenged it in court again in July 2021.
The Forest Service wanted to sacrifice lynx, grizzly bear, and elk habitat to subsidize the timber industry at a cost of $588,000 federal taxpayer dollars. We tried to work with the Forest Service on this, but the agency stubbornly refused to acknowledge the best available science or the law and instead arbitrarily side-stepped the public, changed definitions, and tried to remap federally-designated lynx habitat to get around legally-mandated habitat protection requirements.
The Greater Red Lodge Timber Sale is in the Custer-Gallatin National Forest, directly adjacent to the Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness Area and two designated Inventoried Roadless Areas: Burnt Montana and Red Lodge Creek-Hellroaring. As proposed, the project would have built and rebuilt 19 miles of logging roads some of which are currently trails to commercially log 1,051 acres over a period of five to ten years. The project also included clearcutting over 500 acres of mature forests in federally-designated lynx critical habitat and grizzly bear habitat despite both species being listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.
https://www.counterpunch.org/2023/08/24/federal-court-vacates-forest-service-decision-and-halts-massive-yellowstone-ecosystem-logging-project/
Picaro
(1,566 posts)It's sad that the enemy is inside the house.
There is an unholy and corrupt relationship between the leadership of the forest service and the timber industry.
Glad to see at least one victory.
montanacowboy
(6,133 posts)n/t
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,790 posts)LiberaBlueDem
(956 posts)Whereas a National Park is all conserve, and why the whole area, being mostly federal owned, can be made into a Park and conserved
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,790 posts)LiberaBlueDem
(956 posts)The whole Yellowstone ecosystem needs preservation.
Biden needs to step up and protect.
Think. Again.
(9,345 posts)...some savvy investigator looks into who was so determined to clearcut this area, and most importantly, why?
My suggestion would be to follow the money, who in the forest service is getting what from who in the logging industry?
LiberaBlueDem
(956 posts)All the FS logging roads added up are more than the interstate system. Basically the FS subsidizes logging, and the loggers love it!
Think. Again.
(9,345 posts)...if facilitating logging on federal land is actually the purpose of the forest service?
(I honestly don't know but perhaps it is? It certainly seems that way...)
LiberaBlueDem
(956 posts)FS is in the Agriculture department. FS was founded to facilitate logging, mining and other commercial activities on Federal lands.
The Park service is in the Interior department. And it's purpose if to conserve and protect select federal lands.
Think. Again.
(9,345 posts)As that's the case, I'm very happy the logging was stopped, but certainly can't hold any FS individuals to blame for doing their job.
I would say we should probably re-purpose the FS so that conservation and forest health is their mission, with logging in there where it fits within that mission, and definitely take away the main purpose of facilitation of logging for the logging industry's benefit.
Our federal lands shouldn't have an in-house tree-give away dept. With a sole purpose of creating logging company profits.
2naSalit
(87,289 posts)It is pristine boreal forest, not much of that left on the planet. That whole patch of land, the entire greater Yellowstone ecosystem should be deemed off limits to extractive industry, and tourism in some places.