That's just a silly question, now isn't it?

You know better than that.

As for what I "know better," I happen to know that the tritium isn't going to kill any one.

If anyone here "knows" better, it would be interesting for them to calculate how long it will take for all the tritium on this planet, both natural and synthetic to kill as many people as air pollution will kill in the next ten minutes.

The death toll from air pollution is about 13 people per minute.

The air pollution death toll:

Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (Lancet Volume 396, Issue 10258, 17–23 October 2020, Pages 1223-1249). This study is a huge undertaking and the list of authors from around the world is rather long. These studies are always open sourced; and I invite people who want to carry on about Fukushima to open it and search the word "radiation." It appears once. Radon, a side product brought to the surface by fracking while we all wait for the grand so called "renewable energy" nirvana that did not come, is not here and won't come, appears however: Household radon, from the decay of natural uranium, which has been cycling through the environment ever since oxygen appeared in the Earth's atmosphere.

Here is what it says about air pollution deaths in the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Survey, if one is too busy to open it oneself because one is too busy carrying on about Fukushima:

keep on ladling it over their heads.

scenario you cite. The air pollution deaths are cases of exposure over a period of time and the cumulative effect and also people with other underlying conditions like severe asthma etc. The same methodology would be used for looking at exposure to radiation over time. Immediate exposures to radiation causing death require very high levels whereas, like in the case of air pollutants, radiation exposure is "dosage", toxicity, duration and frequency dependent. So over time is the release an exposure risk on that basis is the right way to examine the question.

I don't think any reasonable person was expecting immediate human death from the release but most of what I've seen has been concern about ocean species and long term biological effects if any on all species. It's a reasonable concern for people to ask questions and the current science should have information, but perhaps not yet know all, to our risks going forward. People are apparently at various stages of concern all the way from indifferent to hysterical which is not atypical in environmental matters.

There won't be figures because we know tritium is like the baby of radioactive things we need to worry about physically, especially diluted into the Pacific Ocean