Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Benton D Struckcheon

(2,347 posts)
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 08:43 PM Feb 2014

The Death Spiral of the Utilities Starts in Hawaii

Interesting post on the blog of someone I follow on Twitter. His take, which I haven't seen elsewhere, is that solar doesn't have to be competitive with the cheapest or even the average cost of electric generation. It only has to be competitive with the peak cost in order to be economically viable. BUT, as it's installed to answer peak demand, it causes its own costs to decline through the simple logic of spreading fixed costs over a larger and larger production run, causing a virtuous circle for solar, and a vicious one for utilities.
To quote:

Solar doesn’t have to compete with the cheapest electrical base load plants. No, Solar only has to compete with the most expensive forms of electricity to be adopted enough to push prices down to near grid parity. 8 cents per kwh is a low enough price to crush the price of “peaker” electricity.
Peaker energy can cost as much as 10 times as much as base load electricity. PPE charges companies $1.20 per kwh for peaker energy! It’s commonly accepted natural gas peaker electricity costs $.18 per kwh. It’s common for peaker to cost twice as much as regular base power, and 4 times as much is common too.
This peaker power is demanded on the hottest, sunniest days of the year – exactly when Solar is best at producing energy.
8 cents per kwh is easily cheap enough to be cost competitive with peaker electricity. If a company has a choice between installing Solar and installing a peaker natural gas plant, Solar can be an economic choice, even before incentives.


Lots more at this link. Very much worth reading:

http://monetaryrealism.com/the-solar-powered-death-spiral-for-utilities-begins-in-hawaii/
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Death Spiral of the Utilities Starts in Hawaii (Original Post) Benton D Struckcheon Feb 2014 OP
hawaii is captive of an obsolet and evil power monoply nt msongs Feb 2014 #1
Someone had a tweet on awhile ago regrding a Calif. landlord who truedelphi Feb 2014 #2
That's an eye opener. n/t Benton D Struckcheon Feb 2014 #3
Do you honestly think that publicly owned utilities will mind? eridani Feb 2014 #4
You bet they mind. kristopher Feb 2014 #5
Maybe I have that bias because Seattle City Light is dependent on hydro eridani Feb 2014 #6
Google this kristopher Feb 2014 #7
Seattle has hydro, but also invests in alternative sources, and encourages home solar generation: freshwest Feb 2014 #8

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
2. Someone had a tweet on awhile ago regrding a Calif. landlord who
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 09:16 PM
Feb 2014

Installed solar. His two dozen apartment dwelling tenants paid him rent, but no utilities.

Cost for all two dozen units after installing solar? Twenty two bucks a month! Not a piece - but for all apts combined!

eridani

(51,907 posts)
4. Do you honestly think that publicly owned utilities will mind?
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 11:49 PM
Feb 2014

They don't have to make a profit--just cover expenses.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
5. You bet they mind.
Sun Feb 23, 2014, 12:36 AM
Feb 2014

Virtually all utilities are invested in large scale thermal power plants - commonly called 'base load" plants - that are designed to run 24/7. Many of them depend on selling into two different kinds of markets to meet their expenses; they throttle back at night sell their production by long term contract, and then during the day they crank it up and sell into the short term (hour or day ahead) market where the power is much more expensive. The bid they place is based on their fuel costs, with the grid operator stacking bids from lowest to highest until they hit the amount of power they solicited bids for. Whatever the value of the final bid, that is the price that all lower bidders also receive.

Since wind and solar have no fuel costs they are bidding into the same market and driving down the amount paid to the generators for the power and the large generators are finding it increasingly difficult to meet their expenses. Cheap natural gas prices are also a big factor, but where wind and solar are plentiful during the day, it is especially bad.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
6. Maybe I have that bias because Seattle City Light is dependent on hydro
Sun Feb 23, 2014, 12:59 AM
Feb 2014

Of course demand here is highest in the winter for heat, and that electricity gets sold to CA in the summer for air consitioning.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The Death Spiral of the U...