Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumGenghis the Green?
Genghis Khan has been branded the greenest invader in history - after his murderous conquests killed so many people that huge swathes of cultivated land returned to forest
The Mongol leader, who established a vast empire between the 13th and 14th centuries, helped remove nearly 700 million tons of carbon from the atmosphere, claims a new study.
The deaths of 40 million people meant that large areas of cultivated land grew thick once again with trees, which absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
he 700 million tons of carbon absorbed as a result of the Mongol empire is about the same produced in a year from the global use of petrol.
Hmmm. This should give activists some good ideas!
packman
(16,296 posts)I really, REALLY, wish you hadn't posted this. My mind shudders at the comparisons that can be made to other, "eco-killers".
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)by a significant reduction of the human burden on the planet. How that might happen is an open question, but I don't think humans have the necessary lifting power any more - short of triggering a global thermonuclear winter. Absent that, it's going to be up to Mother Nature to decide how she wants to prune the bush.
Remember, if it wasn't for famine, disease and war, we'd have gone extinct already.
hunter
(38,346 posts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis_Khan
I'll go to hell for this, but imagine the Blessed Virgin Mary with a knife.
pscot
(21,024 posts)a full-on nuclear holocaust.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)Global thermonuclear war, or a disintegration of techno-industrial civilization due to climate change. Not much of a choice really - they both seem to end up at much the same place.
pscot
(21,024 posts)The huge polar vortex has been a more or less stationary feature over the center of the country for the last couple of months. It occured to me that If it were to persist through the spring and into summer it would blow away the "normal variability" argument, and posibly arouse the public.. Some catastrophe of that magnitude is inevitable, probably sooner rather than later. Events may even bring about the spiritual turnover you've talked about.
stuntcat
(12,022 posts)PLAGUE!!! I guess it would have to take out at least 75% of us if it has any hope of sparing the rest of the species we're wiping out of existence forever.
This is what I'm hoping for. I'm afraid of what it would mean for all the nuclear reactors we'll leave running, and all the "farmed" animals who'll die. But starving to death would be nicer than the way we'd kill them anyway.
I'm totally holding out for disease, it's the planet's best hope!!