Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 12:16 PM Feb 2014

Genghis the Green?

Genghis Khan the GREEN: Invader killed so many people that carbon levels plummeted

Genghis Khan has been branded the greenest invader in history - after his murderous conquests killed so many people that huge swathes of cultivated land returned to forest

The Mongol leader, who established a vast empire between the 13th and 14th centuries, helped remove nearly 700 million tons of carbon from the atmosphere, claims a new study.

The deaths of 40 million people meant that large areas of cultivated land grew thick once again with trees, which absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

he 700 million tons of carbon absorbed as a result of the Mongol empire is about the same produced in a year from the global use of petrol.

Hmmm. This should give activists some good ideas!
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Genghis the Green? (Original Post) GliderGuider Feb 2014 OP
Oh, Gawd packman Feb 2014 #1
There is no environmental problem today that would not be made easier to address GliderGuider Feb 2014 #2
Adolescent girls changing history once again. hunter Feb 2014 #3
Definitely supports the case for pscot Feb 2014 #4
That's what it would take. What a choice... GliderGuider Feb 2014 #5
I was looking at the national weather map on TV this morning pscot Feb 2014 #6
An even better choice: stuntcat Feb 2014 #7
 

packman

(16,296 posts)
1. Oh, Gawd
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 01:16 PM
Feb 2014

I really, REALLY, wish you hadn't posted this. My mind shudders at the comparisons that can be made to other, "eco-killers".

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
2. There is no environmental problem today that would not be made easier to address
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 01:36 PM
Feb 2014

by a significant reduction of the human burden on the planet. How that might happen is an open question, but I don't think humans have the necessary lifting power any more - short of triggering a global thermonuclear winter. Absent that, it's going to be up to Mother Nature to decide how she wants to prune the bush.

Remember, if it wasn't for famine, disease and war, we'd have gone extinct already.

hunter

(38,346 posts)
3. Adolescent girls changing history once again.
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 02:24 PM
Feb 2014
Some accounts say that Genghis Khan was castrated by a Tangut princess using a hidden knife, who wanted revenge against his treatment of the Tanguts and stop him from raping her. After his castration, Genghis Khan died...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis_Khan


I'll go to hell for this, but imagine the Blessed Virgin Mary with a knife.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
5. That's what it would take. What a choice...
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 04:32 PM
Feb 2014

Global thermonuclear war, or a disintegration of techno-industrial civilization due to climate change. Not much of a choice really - they both seem to end up at much the same place.

pscot

(21,024 posts)
6. I was looking at the national weather map on TV this morning
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 05:00 PM
Feb 2014

The huge polar vortex has been a more or less stationary feature over the center of the country for the last couple of months. It occured to me that If it were to persist through the spring and into summer it would blow away the "normal variability" argument, and posibly arouse the public.. Some catastrophe of that magnitude is inevitable, probably sooner rather than later. Events may even bring about the spiritual turnover you've talked about.

stuntcat

(12,022 posts)
7. An even better choice:
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 08:37 PM
Feb 2014

PLAGUE!!! I guess it would have to take out at least 75% of us if it has any hope of sparing the rest of the species we're wiping out of existence forever.

This is what I'm hoping for. I'm afraid of what it would mean for all the nuclear reactors we'll leave running, and all the "farmed" animals who'll die. But starving to death would be nicer than the way we'd kill them anyway.

I'm totally holding out for disease, it's the planet's best hope!!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Genghis the Green?