Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThe nuclear renaissance is stone cold dead
2013 has been the nuclear power industry's annus horribilis and the nuclear renaissance can now be pronounced stone cold dead. Dr Jim Green reveals the global unravelling of the nuclear dream ...The industry is finding it increasingly difficult to profitably operate existing reactors - especially ageing reactors requiring refurbishments - let alone build new ones.
This year has been the nuclear power industry's annus horribilis and the nuclear renaissance can now be pronounced stone cold dead.
Nuclear power suffered its biggest ever one-year fall in 2012 - nuclear generation fell 7% from the 2011 figure. Nuclear generation fell in no less than 17 countries], including all of the top five nuclear-generating countries. Nuclear power accounted for 17% of global electricity generation in 1993 and it has steadily declined to 10% now.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has downwardly revised its nuclear power projections, and now anticipates growth of 23% to 100% percent by 2030.
Historically, the IAEA's upper projections have been fanciful, and its lower projections are usually much closer to the mark. So annual growth of a little over 1% is about as much as the industry can realistically hope for. And the IAEA will further reduce its projections when it factors in this year's annus horribilis.
http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_analysis/2211231/the_nuclear_renaissance_is_stone_cold_dead.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 797 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The nuclear renaissance is stone cold dead (Original Post)
madokie
Feb 2014
OP
We certainly need to maintain our coal powered electrical generation facilities; even increasing....
democratisphere
Feb 2014
#3
Coal and Nuclear are still predominant sources of Electrical Power Generation in the US.
democratisphere
Feb 2014
#5
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)1. Nuclear power must be part of the mix for our very power hungry world.
Nuclear power plant location needs to be scrutinized for maximum safety. Hope to see many new reactors coming online in the next several decades.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)2. No, it doesn't; in fact its economics support the continued use of coal.
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)3. We certainly need to maintain our coal powered electrical generation facilities; even increasing....
their numbers if the government will allow it. SAFE nuclear power generation is the power of the future.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)4. Do we really? Why is that?
I'd love to hear your thoughts on the topic.
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)5. Coal and Nuclear are still predominant sources of Electrical Power Generation in the US.
There is an abundance of coal in the USA.
"American Coal. The United States has enough recoverable coal reserves to last at least another 250 years, with reserves that are over one-and-one-half times greater than our nearest competitor, Russia, and over twice that of China. Americas known reserves alone constitute 27 percent of the entire worlds coal supply."
http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/energy-overview/coal/